Moderator: MagsJ
Authority Figure wrote:Dude. I work hard. I have a job. I'm smart, and successful at what I do.
But that doesn't stop me from coming home at the end of the day and thinking, 'Hmm,
1. Everyone is not equal.
2. Some people get ahead because they're born into it.
3. Everyone having the same odds as 'getting lucky' requires you to first define luck, which is problematic and probably not worth pursuing in any meaningful fashion.
Then I sometimes go on to think things like 'Hmm, the system we live in seems to be run by some of the most satanic people on the planet, and with a few adjustments to the world banking oligarch hell-bent on making our lives serve like 2000 actual people, we could live in a relative utopia where basically the lives of everyone are more or less equal. At the least, way more than now.
Authority Figure wrote:Then sometimes I'm met with Americans who throw at me literally some of the strangest arguments known to man.
This is the life I lead.
Smears wrote:Authority Figure wrote:Then sometimes I'm met with Americans who throw at me literally some of the strangest arguments known to man.
This is the life I lead.
I read all these books by this american guy once, and he talked all about this crazy logic stuff, and I came to the conclusion, that logic is just a lens, or a grid which we might lay over things in order to sort them out, but that there is literally nothing outside of it, but that there are still some things in everything that it can't quite get at, and therefore you can make any statement, about anything, backed by any opinion into a logical argument. I believe the term, "illogical" is a misnomer. So naturally, some of my arguments might be a little bit twisty and turny, but I'm not bullshitting at all.
Smears wrote:Authority Figure wrote:Then sometimes I'm met with Americans who throw at me literally some of the strangest arguments known to man.
This is the life I lead.
I read all these books by this american guy once, and he talked all about this crazy logic stuff, and I came to the conclusion, that logic is just a lens, or a grid which we might lay over things in order to sort them out, but that there is literally nothing outside of it, but that there are still some things in everything that it can't quite get at, and therefore you can make any statement, about anything, backed by any opinion into a logical argument. I believe the term, "illogical" is a misnomer. So naturally, some of my arguments might be a little bit twisty and turny, but I'm not bullshitting at all.
Pezer wrote:Smears wrote:Authority Figure wrote:Then sometimes I'm met with Americans who throw at me literally some of the strangest arguments known to man.
This is the life I lead.
I read all these books by this american guy once, and he talked all about this crazy logic stuff, and I came to the conclusion, that logic is just a lens, or a grid which we might lay over things in order to sort them out, but that there is literally nothing outside of it, but that there are still some things in everything that it can't quite get at, and therefore you can make any statement, about anything, backed by any opinion into a logical argument. I believe the term, "illogical" is a misnomer. So naturally, some of my arguments might be a little bit twisty and turny, but I'm not bullshitting at all.
Every single living person is equal to every other living person?
Authority Figure wrote:Smears wrote:Authority Figure wrote:Then sometimes I'm met with Americans who throw at me literally some of the strangest arguments known to man.
This is the life I lead.
I read all these books by this american guy once, and he talked all about this crazy logic stuff, and I came to the conclusion, that logic is just a lens, or a grid which we might lay over things in order to sort them out, but that there is literally nothing outside of it, but that there are still some things in everything that it can't quite get at, and therefore you can make any statement, about anything, backed by any opinion into a logical argument. I believe the term, "illogical" is a misnomer. So naturally, some of my arguments might be a little bit twisty and turny, but I'm not bullshitting at all.
Yeah. From there you read Wittgenstein. Then you have a nervous breakdown. Then you learn that philosophy is stupid and you get into the occult.
It's not that the arguments are twisty turny. The arguments are just bad. What the constitution says has nothing to do with anything here.
We're talking about whether one should gloat about shaking hands with putrid specimens of existence.
Authority Figure wrote:Clinton is a brainwashed person controlled by Hilary.
Dude, try to dream. I smoke more than you (probably) and I make it a point.
Otherwise existence is just consciousness separated by periods of unpenetrable coma blackness.
I pretty much just use weed as a place to put hash.
Authority Figure wrote:I pretty much just use weed as a place to put hash.
I laughed.
You definitely seem to smoke more.
Still. Dreaming is important. Truly enlightened people a) don't need drugs and b) don't ever lose 'consciousness;' when they dream it's lucid.
The only lucid dreams I've ever had were when I was sober.

Smears wrote:This girl was tricked into working her ass off so she'd have money to travel the world, and they gave her the money but not the time. She followed the rules thinking she would be better off, and she's facing the fact that all she got out of it was the "prestige" of a high paying job.

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Helandhighwater, Heritrix [Crawler]