I meant predetermined so I took it that ‘predeterminative’ if I had spelled it right, would have been a better use of language for something which is that which determines.
What I was alluding to is the idea that something from the outside is operating upon the line of transformation. That is; factors derived from the environment affect changes to the internal line DNA would take ~ as it would otherwise have evolved by itself [the latter being what you appeared to be describing].
Let us say ‘the hands that mould the clay’ or the clay which moulds itself, its probably both [nature/nurture].
Perception is a focus, a centralisation of thought towards the particular, one cannot perceive ‘all’. unlimited awareness would include e.g. my awareness and all other peculiars of the case. I suppose we could think of awareness as something out there which we all tap into when we focus our perceptions? Then as I don’t think we can separate awareness from mind and consciousness, that would place all of our minds as out there rather than ours. In fact I’d say that would mean such a mental entity would not belong to anyone [which I rather like actually].
Gods I think are just personifications of things we see in the world, maybe they represent something, but then we should be debating that rather than illusions pertaining whatever it is.
I don’t think divinity is itself anxious, the anxiety concerns what potentially may occur to it in living form. …but that anxiety probably only happens when it is in living form, if say we consider that I am seeing the notion as if I were about to be born [so I wouldn’t want bad things to occur]. Divinity is I’d assume in some manner of equivalent state to complete ignorance about where it has yet to be or has yet to become. it’s a before an after thing.
Hmm I don’t know there, I wouldn’t think divinity is ignorant or anything like that, yet that’s how all life is born so I assume there’s a twist of some kind?
_