Moderator: Stoic Guardian
James L Walker wrote:How much longer can western civilization upkeep the bullshit illusions of "free" society?
.
Moreno wrote:James L Walker wrote:How much longer can western civilization upkeep the bullshit illusions of "free" society?
.
So....
what would you say are the illusions of freedom? (what are the specific actions, choicesbehaviorismsm that people think are free AND lead them to think they are free but are really not?)
and
what is not being allowed?
How much longer can western civilization upkeep the bullshit illusions of "free" society?
It is clear that "free" society has never existed and that the one we currently live in is anything but the sort.
statiktech wrote:Who do you think propagates these ideas?
James S Saint wrote:I just discovered Obama's most recent reaction to the proof that he actually did fake his birth certificate. As of March 16, 2012 he signed into law the replacement of the Congress and the Constitution with his appointed government.
National Defense Resource Preparedness Act
For a verbal description; Analysis of Peacetime Marshal Law
It is now law that ALL industries, services, and resources (including human resources) answer to the President. The USA just became a Judeo-Nazi State (Fabien Socialism). It actually states that even in peacetime, his appointed department secretaries have presidential authority to conscribe without payment anyone deemed of valuable service to the national defense. All forms of energy, all materials, all foods, all services, and all moneies are now the property of the President.
It is a very long document wherein every aspect of life has been declared the property of the President's new government.
The coup d'tat has just been sprung.
And the free Internet is about to go "bye-bye".
..and of course, as usual, the Lamestream media has said nothing as it is their job to keep you preoccupied with the more serious events such as the death of Whitney Houston.
statiktech wrote:How much longer can western civilization upkeep the bullshit illusions of "free" society?
It is clear that "free" society has never existed and that the one we currently live in is anything but the sort.
If it clearly isn't the case, it isn't much of an illusion...
Also, "free society" is theoretical - it is an ideal. Maybe that's why it seems illusory. If anything, it is probably more shared delusion than anything. Who do you think propagates these ideas?
Pezer wrote:statiktech wrote:Who do you think propagates these ideas?
Groups that are able to effectively put pressure on governments.
Groups that are able to effectively put pressure on governments.
statiktech wrote:Groups that are able to effectively put pressure on governments.
Like who? Are we talking a numbers game, or an authority game?
statiktech wrote:Groups that are able to effectively put pressure on governments.
Like who? Are we talking a numbers game, or an authority game?
statiktech wrote:Groups that are able to effectively put pressure on governments.
Like who? Are we talking a numbers game, or an authority game?
Nietzsche wrote:Blind pupils. - As long as a man knows very well the strength and weaknesses of his teaching, his art, his religion, its power is still slight. The pupil and apostle who, blinded by the authority of the master and by the piety he feels toward him, pays no attention to the weaknesses of a teaching, a religion, and soon usually has for that reason more power than the master. The influence of a man has never yet grown great without his blind pupils. To help a perception to achieve victory often means merely to unite it with stupidity so intimately that the weight of the latter also enforces the victory of the former.
statiktech wrote:It's odd to me that neither of you even considered the people themselves as an answer.
Nietzsche wrote:Blind pupils. - As long as a man knows very well the strength and weaknesses of his teaching, his art, his religion, its power is still slight. The pupil and apostle who, blinded by the authority of the master and by the piety he feels toward him, pays no attention to the weaknesses of a teaching, a religion, and soon usually has for that reason more power than the master. The influence of a man has never yet grown great without his blind pupils. To help a perception to achieve victory often means merely to unite it with stupidity so intimately that the weight of the latter also enforces the victory of the former.
Pezer wrote:statiktech wrote:It's odd to me that neither of you even considered the people themselves as an answer.
Nietzsche wrote:Blind pupils. - As long as a man knows very well the strength and weaknesses of his teaching, his art, his religion, its power is still slight. The pupil and apostle who, blinded by the authority of the master and by the piety he feels toward him, pays no attention to the weaknesses of a teaching, a religion, and soon usually has for that reason more power than the master. The influence of a man has never yet grown great without his blind pupils. To help a perception to achieve victory often means merely to unite it with stupidity so intimately that the weight of the latter also enforces the victory of the former.
What?
I acknowledge my stupidity as part of my power.
statiktech wrote:It's odd to me that neither of you even considered the people themselves as an answer.
Nietzsche wrote:Blind pupils. - As long as a man knows very well the strength and weaknesses of his teaching, his art, his religion, its power is still slight. The pupil and apostle who, blinded by the authority of the master and by the piety he feels toward him, pays no attention to the weaknesses of a teaching, a religion, and soon usually has for that reason more power than the master. The influence of a man has never yet grown great without his blind pupils. To help a perception to achieve victory often means merely to unite it with stupidity so intimately that the weight of the latter also enforces the victory of the former.
In fact, Nietzsche himself was a stupid blind pupil of Schopenhauer. He didn't acknowledge the weaknesses of thinking of life as will and representation
statiktech wrote:...I think you missed my point. Common people propagate the bullshit because we are too quick to accept it, and too complacent to argue. The bullshit doesn't have to be forced down your throat if you can just be convinced, somehow, that you like the taste. Stupidity is powerful indeed, but even more-so as utility, rather than simple naivety.In fact, Nietzsche himself was a stupid blind pupil of Schopenhauer. He didn't acknowledge the weaknesses of thinking of life as will and representation
This is presumptuous and just not true. Have you read any of N's criticisms of Schopenhauer?
Pezer wrote:You have some balls, calling a nuanced criticism of Nietzsche true or untrue.
He didn't acknowledge the weaknesses of thinking of life as will and representation
I think you used that quote without really understanding what it means.
Return to Society, Government, and Economics
Users browsing this forum: psbot [Picsearch]