Contra-Nietzsche wrote:Not only did you not speak of this before, but you still do not speak of it now.
I grew up on that. Gotta break it down a little bit for those of us who shoot peanuts out of our noses.
So you have a universe of information who's information we interpret to be reality rotating information? Is it a single big disk, or a multiplex of them, each acting as a gear, where we can only see one side of them at any time, being a holographic projection of a moment? Or something else all together?
Just never really get a chance to express it because of the Dasein barrier
just within the last post you gave me, can you isolate the cognitive operators (in mathematics, + - x /),
I’m not a mathematician and the op is not math, its just philosophically reductive and concise.
Perhaps if you go through one of the arguments in my last post then we can get some way to understand each other.
'Mathematics is nothing more, nothing less, than the exact part of our thinking.' Luitzen Brouwer
Contra-Nietzsche wrote:Ill look at the thread later, still learning this nook tablet. Allegory and metaphor as sub-poetics is none the less quite mathematical, was just writing a response to how a philosopher of the mind assumes it is generated.... its ongoing discussion wise and so dont know quite where it will end..... I may be natively more flexible and inventive than he, but he knew the generic confines of my cognitive style before I was even born, so is quite able to assertain my basis of generating new ideas and hit them in their unconscious roots. So.... yeah, but at root, yes, I say with full certainty its mathematics. We haven't reached the ends of philosophy, its midpoint isnt even beckoning in the horizon. Dont be so quick to denounce or discredit the possibilities of our comprehension of what mathematics is or can be. You'll find some are comprehensive of the dogma, why it is crucial to some, but will not hold to the necessary restrictions, having personally found the underlining means and restrictions laughable. This doesn't undervalue a calculator as a tool or a rational technical creation, but does question the breath of its functions as the mind expands and changes it orientations. At the neurological microtubing level, its all processed similarly, and all the assimilated functions of the mind have a similar biochemical root in evolution in sharing similar architectural roots. Why math would cease to be when novel connections or means are made are beyond my comprehension. If anything, wouldn't increase expontentially in regards to the complexity of every dualistic apprehension of this activity.... every novel feedback loop established? Its from perspectives of specialization itnflounders. The task of every Cynic is to investigate this. Its why we have a tradition of traveling, mixinf introspective and empirical knowledge with sociology and statecraft, a comprehension of biological rythms with its contrast in applications of law and culture.
"Logic is just applied instincts," goes the geneticist.
Abstract buns with concrete things as the patty? And each but performs a different operator function in making the concrete thing feel so real? Your explanation for a Cartesian mind body dualism?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]