Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

For discussions of culture, politics, economics, sociology, law, business and any other topic that falls under the social science remit.

Moderator: Stoic Guardian

Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby SIATD v2 » Sat May 26, 2012 7:33 pm

The Department of Homeland Security has flagged hundreds of words as "suspect" – and while many make sense, like "Al Qaeda," some are just plain odd. For example, the DHS may dig through your cyber life if you write something about snow. Or pork.

So, you’ve just come back from a beach holiday in Mexico and posted about it on your blog. Or maybe you’ve tweeted about skiing lessons? Updated your status, saying you’re stuck home with food poisoning?

All those things will tweak the DHS antennae, according to a manual published by the agency. The Analyst’s Desktop Binder, used by agency employees at their National Operations Center to identify "media reports that reflect adversely on DHS and response activities," includes hundreds of words that set off Big Brother’s silent alarms.

Department chiefs were forced to release the manual following a House hearing over documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. It revealed how analysts monitor social networks and media organizations for comments that "reflect adversely" on the government.


Image

Download full manual here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... acted.html
It's like going to heaven and finding God smokin' crack!
Magsj wrote:I met a guy who abhorred all authority figures but he was lovely ergo.. the two can go together.
User avatar
SIATD v2
One Man Pussy Riot
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby James S Saint » Sat May 26, 2012 7:48 pm

What they observe isn't the issue. What they DO with what they observe IS, such as the mandates to police departments to profile with categorical labels; "Terrorist", "Extremist", "Anti-Semite", "Racist", and so on. These labels are being applied by seriously unintelligent police officers who also act with the presumption that such labels are accurate - the very cause of societal corruption.
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Gain is obtained by giving a lot and keeping a little.
Those who too ardently seek to be seen as correct, see only correctness in themselves.
The Social Paradox - to be well grounded and soundly harmonious, one must rise above the dirt and noise.
The One God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 11138
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Contra-Nietzsche » Sun May 27, 2012 3:45 am

Hmmmm, actually, the DNDO- Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, is quite a wise name to scan for, and should not leave.
Wave and Flu is a remarkably unwise name to scan for, and is wasting that glorified googlebot's energy. I can claim I was surfing, caught a wave, but had to leave early cause I came down with flu symptoms.

Unless of course these are known codewords- in which case now everyone knows were searching for code words. If were searching for codewords, then I say we pass a law so these hippies demanding to know this stuff in lawsuits can be lied to, given substitute codewards in exchange, that are not the actual codewords. Like, what happens if some terrorist faction is using 'Biscuit' for dirty bomb- are like, 7 months into planning this operation they completely planned over the internet, and are nearing to launching, then one sees the results of this lawsuit and find oddly the word 'Biscuit' is on the list. Wouldn't that just fucking drop the ball that the FBI is undercover posting there too, getting ready to launch a bust. We'd be fuck.

I humbly request the government to lie about mundane shit like this.
User avatar
Contra-Nietzsche
Onasander
 
Posts: 1814
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:37 am
Location: Not fucking Hawaii

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby James S Saint » Sun May 27, 2012 4:53 am

Dunno... didn't see Walker's name on that list anywhere... hmmm
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Gain is obtained by giving a lot and keeping a little.
Those who too ardently seek to be seen as correct, see only correctness in themselves.
The Social Paradox - to be well grounded and soundly harmonious, one must rise above the dirt and noise.
The One God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 11138
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Contra-Nietzsche » Sun May 27, 2012 7:02 am

We should have a philosophy essay contest, discussion the history of a random classical philosopher, incorporating all the words above in that list into it.
User avatar
Contra-Nietzsche
Onasander
 
Posts: 1814
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:37 am
Location: Not fucking Hawaii

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby SIATD v2 » Sun May 27, 2012 10:08 am

The funniest thing about this is that the people who most commonly use most of these terms are...




The Department of Homeland Security.

Q - Is is possible our entire counter-terrorism apparatus is just spying on itself?
A - It is not just possible, it is certain.
It's like going to heaven and finding God smokin' crack!
Magsj wrote:I met a guy who abhorred all authority figures but he was lovely ergo.. the two can go together.
User avatar
SIATD v2
One Man Pussy Riot
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Uccisore » Thu May 31, 2012 2:11 am

Meh, who cares? The actual process that the Government uses to monitor communications and to decide which communications TO monitor isn't even vaguely known by anybody that's going to participate in this thread, or in any blog that anybody who participates in this thread will read. As such, the word list itself tells us nothing. All we know for sure is that there's not a warm body reading over every email and forum post that contains one of these words- else we'd all be employed doing so.
User avatar
Uccisore
The Legitimatizer
 
Posts: 7881
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:14 pm
Location: Deep in the forests of Maine

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby James S Saint » Thu May 31, 2012 2:37 am

You can also be assured that the people previewing and assessing threats are not geniuses. :-?
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Gain is obtained by giving a lot and keeping a little.
Those who too ardently seek to be seen as correct, see only correctness in themselves.
The Social Paradox - to be well grounded and soundly harmonious, one must rise above the dirt and noise.
The One God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 11138
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Gobbo » Thu May 31, 2012 3:03 am

Americans in this thread:

"we should be lied to more"
"meh. Who cares?"
User avatar
Gobbo
Choronzon
 
Posts: 11111
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:23 am
Location: The Belly

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby SIATD v2 » Thu May 31, 2012 10:06 am

Uccisore wrote:Meh, who cares?


I would have thought that you as a Christian conservative would care, but...

The actual process that the Government uses to monitor communications and to decide which communications TO monitor isn't even vaguely known by anybody that's going to participate in this thread, or in any blog that anybody who participates in this thread will read.


This is a DHS report, not a blog. I don't get much of my information from blogs. Perhaps you're getting confused with someone else.

I don't know as much about the NSA as I do about our local UK equivalent GCHQ but I have a pretty good idea how they decide which communications to monitor - they basically monitor everything they can get. The key question is how do they analyse the vast amount of information that flows through their systems and determine which communications are worth of greater scrutiny.

As such, the word list itself tells us nothing.


By that standard, everything tells us nothing.

All we know for sure is that there's not a warm body reading over every email and forum post that contains one of these words- else we'd all be employed doing so.


They don't need to have a human reading every email and forum post, you can get machines to do that. But ultimately, their vision is for all of us to be 'employed' doing this, just without them having to pay us. Gradually we are made more and more afraid, more and more suspicious, until we no longer trust ourselves and carry out pre-emptive self-censorship of our own thoughts. It's an obvious trajectory.

Another obvious trajectory towards a point where the government both admits and denies terrorising its citizens in the same breath. It used to be that the state would simply deny that it murdered its own civilians and blamed it on someone else. Now we live in a situation where they are saying 'well, we USED TO do that sort of thing, during the Cold War, but not anymore'. The next step is 'yes, we do still do that, but no we don't still do that', i.e. pure doublespeak.

Have you ever read 1984? It's basically an early training manual for the war on terror. That camera in your computer that's currently pointing at you without you even realising that you voluntarily brought it into your home - Orwell foresaw all that in the 1940s.
It's like going to heaven and finding God smokin' crack!
Magsj wrote:I met a guy who abhorred all authority figures but he was lovely ergo.. the two can go together.
User avatar
SIATD v2
One Man Pussy Riot
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby SIATD v2 » Thu May 31, 2012 10:08 am

James S Saint wrote:You can also be assured that the people previewing and assessing threats are not geniuses. :-?


No, but they are neurotics.
It's like going to heaven and finding God smokin' crack!
Magsj wrote:I met a guy who abhorred all authority figures but he was lovely ergo.. the two can go together.
User avatar
SIATD v2
One Man Pussy Riot
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Uccisore » Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:41 am

SIATD v2 wrote:
Uccisore wrote:Meh, who cares?


I would have thought that you as a Christian conservative would care, but...

The actual process that the Government uses to monitor communications and to decide which communications TO monitor isn't even vaguely known by anybody that's going to participate in this thread, or in any blog that anybody who participates in this thread will read.


This is a DHS report, not a blog.


I didn't say it was, see? But whatever you're citing, it refers to the DHS in the third person, talks about 'their manual', and calls them Big Brother, so I'm going to go out on a limb and assume it's not an official DHS report, whatever it is. It's an opinion piece designed to evoke particular emotional content that isn't justified by the actual data provided.


They don't need to have a human reading every email and forum post, you can get machines to do that.


Yeah, they have machines that look for terms in connection with other terms. Like for example, 'snow' is going to be searched for in connection with...I don't know, some chemical compound that snow is a slang for, or it's purpose, or the last name of some scientist that invented it, or whatever. So the machine is going to make sure that no human being has to actually look at you talking about how it snowed yesterday, because nobody in the NSA cares.

Which is why I said "Meh, who cares?" The implication of what you cited is that if you say 'snow' or 'pork' some Government agent is going to hack your computer and start looking through your porn stash. Nothing even vaguely like that is going to occur- in all likelihood, nothing that we didn't already know about or assume is going to occur. In fact, if you read the manual, it's purely about the monitoring of publicly available information like tweets and blog posts...if you don't want the Government looking at your tweets, I think you are misunderstanding the function of Twitter. There's nothing here to get excited about outside of our imaginations filling in suggestive blanks that were presented to be suggestive.

Gradually we are made more and more afraid, more and more suspicious, until we no longer trust ourselves and carry out pre-emptive self-censorship of our own thoughts. It's an obvious trajectory.


And you're saying it's the Government that is causing this attitude, and not the sensationalism that surrounds what they may or may not be doing?

Have you ever read 1984? It's basically an early training manual for the war on terror. That camera in your computer that's currently pointing at you without you even realising that you voluntarily brought it into your home - Orwell foresaw all that in the 1940s.


It's a fucking word list used for searching public media. It would be obscenely incompetent for any security/intelligence agency to not be watching stuff like that. Seriously- what's the alternative? That we decide it's evil or unconstitutional or a violation of human rights for the Government to read what people publicly post on the internet?
User avatar
Uccisore
The Legitimatizer
 
Posts: 7881
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:14 pm
Location: Deep in the forests of Maine

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby SIATD v2 » Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:55 am

Uccisore wrote:I didn't say it was, see? But whatever you're citing, it refers to the DHS in the third person, talks about 'their manual', and calls them Big Brother, so I'm going to go out on a limb and assume it's not an official DHS report, whatever it is. It's an opinion piece designed to evoke particular emotional content that isn't justified by the actual data provided.


Oh, you mean the text I cited? That's from RT.

I would say it is wholly justified, in fact they haven't gone far enough in criticising this.

They don't need to have a human reading every email and forum post, you can get machines to do that.


Yeah, they have machines that look for terms in connection with other terms. Like for example, 'snow' is going to be searched for in connection with...I don't know, some chemical compound that snow is a slang for, or it's purpose, or the last name of some scientist that invented it, or whatever. So the machine is going to make sure that no human being has to actually look at you talking about how it snowed yesterday, because nobody in the NSA cares.


You're missing the point - why pick 'snow' in the first place?

Which is why I said "Meh, who cares?" The implication of what you cited is that if you say 'snow' or 'pork' some Government agent is going to hack your computer and start looking through your porn stash. Nothing even vaguely like that is going to occur- in all likelihood, nothing that we didn't already know about or assume is going to occur.


So unless something is truly 'news' in the sense of being new, you don't care about it?

That's an EXTREMELY odd position for someone who proudly labels himself a 'conservative' to take. Let alone a Christian conservative, someone whose morality derives from some ancient text. I think you should reconsider what motivated you to say 'meh, who cares?', i.e. why you cared enough to say that.

In fact, if you read the manual, it's purely about the monitoring of publicly available information like tweets and blog posts...if you don't want the Government looking at your tweets, I think you are misunderstanding the function of Twitter.


That's exactly how they want you to think - don't fundamentally question whether an open forum where you are limited to 140 characters and where people are frightened into only saying what is deemed acceptable is a tool for social control, just point out that since it's in public it isn't really spying.

This shows that you really don't have a clue what's at stake here. This isn't about invasion of privacy, it's about an atmosphere and mentality that will lead to self-censorship, it is about breeding compliant citizens.

There's nothing here to get excited about outside of our imaginations filling in suggestive blanks that were presented to be suggestive.


In which case why did you post on the thread?

Gradually we are made more and more afraid, more and more suspicious, until we no longer trust ourselves and carry out pre-emptive self-censorship of our own thoughts. It's an obvious trajectory.


And you're saying it's the Government that is causing this attitude, and not the sensationalism that surrounds what they may or may not be doing?


It is several different factors. This isn't about stopping people from using the word 'snow', it's about making people think 'maybe I shouldn't write 'snow' because they might be watching', it is about replacing the ethereal omniscient, omnipresent God of your tradition with a technocratic God, but with the same implications of damnation, fire and brimstone and all that crap. One tool of social control being replaced by another.

Have you ever read 1984? It's basically an early training manual for the war on terror. That camera in your computer that's currently pointing at you without you even realising that you voluntarily brought it into your home - Orwell foresaw all that in the 1940s.


It's a fucking word list used for searching public media. It would be obscenely incompetent for any security/intelligence agency to not be watching stuff like that.


Why, what do you expect they will find? The vast, vast majority of people talking about this stuff are the security services themselves. Spies spying on other spies - doesn't seem like a necessary process to me. Hardly 'obscenely incompetent' for them to not being doing this. In fact, it's a combination of obscene incompetence, corruption, and people like you arguing their case for them because you are scared that has led us to the point where you, a reasonably intelligent person, has been so scared by your own government attacking you that you'll object to anyone who protests the advancement of the security state.

Seriously- what's the alternative? That we decide it's evil or unconstitutional or a violation of human rights for the Government to read what people publicly post on the internet?


And this is why the American Christian mentality and style of argument is such a waste of time - because it breaks everything into polar opposites, denies all subtlety, and invariably leads back round in circular fashion to 'I am right, because I am right'. No wonder you're having such a problem understanding this.
It's like going to heaven and finding God smokin' crack!
Magsj wrote:I met a guy who abhorred all authority figures but he was lovely ergo.. the two can go together.
User avatar
SIATD v2
One Man Pussy Riot
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby brevel_monkey » Sat Jun 02, 2012 4:56 am

I'm not really sure about the justification for the sentence "includes hundreds of words that set off Big Brother’s silent alarms".

The terms are listed as search terms. Whats the justification for thinking that they 'set off alarms'

Department chiefs were forced to release the manual following a House hearing over documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. It revealed how analysts monitor social networks and media organizations for comments that "reflect adversely" on the government.


Glancing through the mission statement it looks like the actual aim of this organization is to collate data from social media posts about specific events which are in progress. This is actually pretty sensible, imo: in any emergency situation these days a wealth of data is posted instantly online and collating this data could be useful in forming a timeline and understanding whats happening.

There is no mention in the mission statement of monitoring for for comments that "reflect adversely" on the government.

btw - pork is on the list because of food/health scares. 'snow' because of potential weather disasters, both of which come under the 'Items of interest' list
Life is infinitely stranger than anything which the mind of man could invent. We would not dare to conceive the things which are really mere commonplaces of existence. If we could fly out of that window hand in hand, hover over this great city, gently remove the roofs, and peep in at the queer things which are going on, the strange coincidences, the plannings, the cross-purposes, the wonderful chains of events, working through generations, and leading to the most outre results, it would make all fiction with its conventionalities and foreseen conclusions most stale and unprofitable.
- Sherlock Holmes, A Case of Identity
User avatar
brevel_monkey
'
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Helandhighwater » Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:06 am

Snow is a slang term for cocaine, often dealers will use slang or obscure terms in order to bypass such security measures, or go unnoticed. The front line measures are computers, which pick out text or phone conversations, the grunts in the data depts will then review the walls of text/audio recordings. Skipping over obviously harmless posting or calls about the weather.

I used to deliberately use words like bomb, cocaine, kill, infidel, ricin, botulinis toxin and TNT in all my phone calls, just because I don't think MI5 are working hard enough.
"I do not know... Some believe that it is only great power that can hold evil in check, but that is not what I have found, I've found it is... the small things, every day deeds of ordinary folk, that keeps the darkness at bay, simple acts of kindness and love, why the small folk I do not know, perhaps it is because I am afraid that it gives me courage."

Gandalf.
User avatar
Helandhighwater
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1051
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 1:13 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby brevel_monkey » Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:31 am

Snow is a slang term for cocaine, often dealers will use slang or obscure terms in order to bypass such security measures, or go unnoticed. The front line measures are computers, which pick out text or phone conversations, the grunts in the data depts will then review the walls of text/audio recordings. Skipping over obviously harmless posting or calls about the weather.

I used to deliberately use words like bomb, cocaine, kill, infidel, ricin, botulinis toxin and TNT in all my phone calls, just because I don't think MI5 are working hard enough.


I don't think you've understood the list very well. It is a list of search terms for searching social media sites i.e. things that have already been made public (blogs, public facebook pages etc). It is not a list of things being screened in private communications or telephone calls.

Also, they aren't trying to catch coded posts to intercept drug deals and the such. At least not according to this booklet. They are searching and documenting events as they happen on the internet and collating data from numerous sources. This is actually pretty standard - all major news agencies and large companies have departments/ people who do the same thing: making reports to keep up to date with their own public image as well as to track what's going on in the world. So for example, if 700 people start tweeting about 'major snow storms' then the DHS will pick up on it. If 700 people start tweeting "I found razor blades in my coke', you can be sure that analysts working for coca cola will pick up on it pretty damned fast and will start writing reports to keep bosses informed.

This isn't high class spy shit. I know someone doing a similar job for a reputation management firm and its about as dull a 9-5 type thing as you can get. They search for key terms using custom built software, scanning for anything that looks pertinent. When they find something that fits their breif of what they are looking for, they have to file a brief report about it. This information is collated by someone a bit higher up the chain, and normally eventually gets delivered in the form of condensed weekly reports or something. If the situation is more urgent, it may get collated faster to make sure that the higher up guys dealing with the press and stuff are as well informed as the press are, because it can be really damaging to be caught unaware. This kind of data collation/analysis is a major industry these days.

Also note, the word 'snow' is clearly listed under the weather/disaster/emergency section in between the words 'sleet' and 'blizzard'.

(EDIT) I should further point out that anything that isn't pertinent will never get seen by anyone but the 9-5 grunt being paid next to minimum wage to scan through stuff. Also, unless they have extraordinary manpower, they are probably only searching major blogs and face book pages rather than the whole internet. The software is configurable to search pre-made lists of important social media contributors. No one has the manpower to sift through every instance of the word 'pork' on the internet and write a report about how and why it was used. So if you're trying to 'trigger the silent alarms' you really aren't wasting anyone's time but your own.
Life is infinitely stranger than anything which the mind of man could invent. We would not dare to conceive the things which are really mere commonplaces of existence. If we could fly out of that window hand in hand, hover over this great city, gently remove the roofs, and peep in at the queer things which are going on, the strange coincidences, the plannings, the cross-purposes, the wonderful chains of events, working through generations, and leading to the most outre results, it would make all fiction with its conventionalities and foreseen conclusions most stale and unprofitable.
- Sherlock Holmes, A Case of Identity
User avatar
brevel_monkey
'
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby brevel_monkey » Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:09 am

That's exactly how they want you to think - don't fundamentally question whether an open forum where you are limited to 140 characters and where people are frightened into only saying what is deemed acceptable is a tool for social control,


I don't know why you'd be frightened. The guidelines of the leaflet clearly state that any personally identifiable information has to be removed for the reports (names, company position, contact info etc) so the person reading the report will have no idea who wrote what they are reading.
Life is infinitely stranger than anything which the mind of man could invent. We would not dare to conceive the things which are really mere commonplaces of existence. If we could fly out of that window hand in hand, hover over this great city, gently remove the roofs, and peep in at the queer things which are going on, the strange coincidences, the plannings, the cross-purposes, the wonderful chains of events, working through generations, and leading to the most outre results, it would make all fiction with its conventionalities and foreseen conclusions most stale and unprofitable.
- Sherlock Holmes, A Case of Identity
User avatar
brevel_monkey
'
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby SIATD v2 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:28 pm

Yeah, right, and Mark Zuckerberg won't ever sell your personal data for profit...

:roll:
It's like going to heaven and finding God smokin' crack!
Magsj wrote:I met a guy who abhorred all authority figures but he was lovely ergo.. the two can go together.
User avatar
SIATD v2
One Man Pussy Riot
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby brevel_monkey » Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:41 pm

Yeah, right, and Mark Zuckerberg won't ever sell your personal data for profit...


If you don't believe that the guidelines in the report are being followed, why would you be worried about the contents of the report?
Life is infinitely stranger than anything which the mind of man could invent. We would not dare to conceive the things which are really mere commonplaces of existence. If we could fly out of that window hand in hand, hover over this great city, gently remove the roofs, and peep in at the queer things which are going on, the strange coincidences, the plannings, the cross-purposes, the wonderful chains of events, working through generations, and leading to the most outre results, it would make all fiction with its conventionalities and foreseen conclusions most stale and unprofitable.
- Sherlock Holmes, A Case of Identity
User avatar
brevel_monkey
'
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby SIATD v2 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 1:23 pm

brevel_monkey wrote:
Yeah, right, and Mark Zuckerberg won't ever sell your personal data for profit...


If you don't believe that the guidelines in the report are being followed, why would you be worried about the contents of the report?


Who says I am worried? To me this is just one document among thousands of similar ones. My argument is that they are monitoring a phenomenon that they have created, and that the logical conclusion to this process is voluntary self-censorship. Worried? No, I'm far beyond just worried.
It's like going to heaven and finding God smokin' crack!
Magsj wrote:I met a guy who abhorred all authority figures but he was lovely ergo.. the two can go together.
User avatar
SIATD v2
One Man Pussy Riot
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Helandhighwater » Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:27 pm

brevel_monkey wrote:
Snow is a slang term for cocaine, often dealers will use slang or obscure terms in order to bypass such security measures, or go unnoticed. The front line measures are computers, which pick out text or phone conversations, the grunts in the data depts will then review the walls of text/audio recordings. Skipping over obviously harmless posting or calls about the weather.

I used to deliberately use words like bomb, cocaine, kill, infidel, ricin, botulinis toxin and TNT in all my phone calls, just because I don't think MI5 are working hard enough.


I don't think you've understood the list very well. It is a list of search terms for searching social media sites i.e. things that have already been made public (blogs, public facebook pages etc). It is not a list of things being screened in private communications or telephone calls.

Also, they aren't trying to catch coded posts to intercept drug deals and the such. At least not according to this booklet. They are searching and documenting events as they happen on the internet and collating data from numerous sources. This is actually pretty standard - all major news agencies and large companies have departments/ people who do the same thing: making reports to keep up to date with their own public image as well as to track what's going on in the world. So for example, if 700 people start tweeting about 'major snow storms' then the DHS will pick up on it. If 700 people start tweeting "I found razor blades in my coke', you can be sure that analysts working for coca cola will pick up on it pretty damned fast and will start writing reports to keep bosses informed.

This isn't high class spy shit. I know someone doing a similar job for a reputation management firm and its about as dull a 9-5 type thing as you can get. They search for key terms using custom built software, scanning for anything that looks pertinent. When they find something that fits their breif of what they are looking for, they have to file a brief report about it. This information is collated by someone a bit higher up the chain, and normally eventually gets delivered in the form of condensed weekly reports or something. If the situation is more urgent, it may get collated faster to make sure that the higher up guys dealing with the press and stuff are as well informed as the press are, because it can be really damaging to be caught unaware. This kind of data collation/analysis is a major industry these days.

Also note, the word 'snow' is clearly listed under the weather/disaster/emergency section in between the words 'sleet' and 'blizzard'.

(EDIT) I should further point out that anything that isn't pertinent will never get seen by anyone but the 9-5 grunt being paid next to minimum wage to scan through stuff. Also, unless they have extraordinary manpower, they are probably only searching major blogs and face book pages rather than the whole internet. The software is configurable to search pre-made lists of important social media contributors. No one has the manpower to sift through every instance of the word 'pork' on the internet and write a report about how and why it was used. So if you're trying to 'trigger the silent alarms' you really aren't wasting anyone's time but your own.


Meh if everyone's doing it who cares, I thought you were on about something interesting and covert, and not entirely legal.
"I do not know... Some believe that it is only great power that can hold evil in check, but that is not what I have found, I've found it is... the small things, every day deeds of ordinary folk, that keeps the darkness at bay, simple acts of kindness and love, why the small folk I do not know, perhaps it is because I am afraid that it gives me courage."

Gandalf.
User avatar
Helandhighwater
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1051
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 1:13 pm

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Uccisore » Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:54 pm

SIATD v2 wrote:You're missing the point - why pick 'snow' in the first place?


Because it's part of their sinister plan to spy on people from Minnesota. I don't know, YOU tell ME. In reality, it's for some reason that would make total and complete sense if you had the facts. Which you don't. Which is why this is nothing to get worked up about.
Again, this is just playing at prejudice. If you're the type of person who's already deeply paranoid about Government intelligence, this will fuel your fire. If you're on the fence or ambivalent, there's no data here to move you to a change of position.

So unless something is truly 'news' in the sense of being new, you don't care about it?


New or exciting, I suppose.

That's an EXTREMELY odd position for someone who proudly labels himself a 'conservative' to take. Let alone a Christian conservative, someone whose morality derives from some ancient text. I think you should reconsider what motivated you to say 'meh, who cares?', i.e. why you cared enough to say that.


Reason, I'd like to think. My motivation is that this just seems like a bunch of sensationalist trash designed to work people up and play to their suspicions without actually providing any information. That sort of thing bugs me.


That's exactly how they want you to think - don't fundamentally question whether an open forum where you are limited to 140 characters and where people are frightened into only saying what is deemed acceptable is a tool for social control, just point out that since it's in public it isn't really spying.


Of course Twitter is a tool for social control, and Facebook, and Myspace before it. That's why I never use them and never will. But for the people who have addicted themselves to telling the entire fucking universe about every waking moment of their lives (and submitting themselves to the review and approval of strangers and near-strangers for it all), it should come as no surprise that 'the entire fucking universe' includes people who work for the FBI, NSA, Coca-Cola, and so on. That's a purely 'have your cake and eat it too' attitude to think otherwise.

This isn't about invasion of privacy, it's about an atmosphere and mentality that will lead to self-censorship, it is about breeding compliant citizens.


Social media was about those things long before the Government got involved (if there was such a time). Self-censorship and complacency comes about just fine by the very nature of the media itself. Which is why you ought not do it if such things concern you.

It is several different factors. This isn't about stopping people from using the word 'snow', it's about making people think 'maybe I shouldn't write 'snow' because they might be watching',


Anyone who wasn't already thinking that way was insanely naive to begin with.

it is about replacing the ethereal omniscient, omnipresent God of your tradition with a technocratic God, but with the same implications of damnation, fire and brimstone and all that crap. One tool of social control being replaced by another.


Yes, the internet in a nutshell. With or without the Government. How many massive political movements have sprung up recently because people were shamed/manipulated into it through a semantic contagion spreading through their social media? Can you even count them on your fingers anymore? Think what you want, but by posting what I am the way I am, I'm actually resisting the effects of social media that you are trying to capitalize on this thread, and arguing for reason rather than 'movement'.





Why, what do you expect they will find? The vast, vast majority of people talking about this stuff are the security services themselves.


The vast majority of people talking about pork and snow? And besides, if you're right about the above, then what's the problem? Let the spies spy on each other.


Seriously- what's the alternative? That we decide it's evil or unconstitutional or a violation of human rights for the Government to read what people publicly post on the internet?


And this is why the American Christian mentality and style of argument is such a waste of time -


It would have been quicker to answer the question. Do you think Governments should be prohibited from monitoring social media? Look, just tell me what you want- You want an open social networking forum where everybody in the world can say things to everybody else in the world that comes with a guarantee that entities you don't trust will never see or take advantage of the information you give? No. That's not even coherent. So tell me what you really want- just to bitch? OK fine- which is why this is nothing exciting.
User avatar
Uccisore
The Legitimatizer
 
Posts: 7881
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:14 pm
Location: Deep in the forests of Maine

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Gobbo » Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:13 am

The threat here isn't the architecture of control being set up; or rather, we shouldn't focus on the things that could, or even seem likely to happen—like absolute power corrupting.

We should be focused on evaluating this in a vacuum that ignores the obvious social trends that will continue.

I mean, if it's just some worker reading your information, but that worker cannot see who 'you' are, well that's fine. Like I said, definitely ignore any concept of precidence or anything type of thinking that is prone to make an extrapolation into the future—don't even consider the fact that there multiple books, blogs, testimonials, and media whispers of eliminating the middle class and turning America/Europe/Australia/Canada/Any world banker controlled country into a slave-system that has been more than identified and documented by demonstrably intelligent people in the 11 years since America was, according to every single instance of evidence and logic, attacked by a Machiavellian cabal within the US and Israeli governments and covered up with high-ranking (Israeli) media assets.

Ignore all that. Basically the more that we analyze different things simplistically, and like overgrown children filled with misappropriated energy, the more we will advance our personal and societal understanding of why these events like what Siatd is referring to transpire.

I agree with everyone but Siatd in this thread in that this is something we should confine to idealic character perceptions. If everyone acts perfectly all the time and we COMPLETELY ignore the past and future, sure, this isn't a big deal at all. In fact I'm emotionally ruffled that you interrupted my insane ignorance about....everything, to bother me with this shit.
User avatar
Gobbo
Choronzon
 
Posts: 11111
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:23 am
Location: The Belly

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Uccisore » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:37 pm

If you don't like the idea of the strange mysterious forces that secretly run the world's economy monitoring your preferences and prejudices, then how about you stop posting them on Facebook, instead of pulling your pants down on a street corner and complaining when somebody looks at your ass?
User avatar
Uccisore
The Legitimatizer
 
Posts: 7881
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:14 pm
Location: Deep in the forests of Maine

Re: Don't mention pork, snow or Al Qaeda

Postby Gobbo » Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:08 am

There's a damaging counterargument: some shitty one-liner you heard from some other yokel parent in the south.

There is a reason I was talking out loud and not -to- you. I'll leave you to figure out what that reason is.
User avatar
Gobbo
Choronzon
 
Posts: 11111
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:23 am
Location: The Belly

Next

Return to Society, Government, and Economics



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]