I don’t like placing bets on unknowns especially when differing variables are involved.
I’m one of those people that likes to be exact and precise. Sorry. 
Well, I seriously wish THAT was even more true.
But grow a set, and participate. It isn’t going to be written into your Bible or anything.
“If you were forced into having to bet, which do you think is more probable?”
Realize that you can be exactly and precisely correct about what the probability was even if it turned out differently.
And also realize that just because I think that the probability favors one outcome far more than another, doesn’t mean that I am not going to try to prevent it. There are times when I really hope to be wrong and work to try to ensure that I was.
I still stand by my position that due to variances there are multiple probabilities.
What is all comes down to is specific events in time that makes one probability more probable over the other.
Pussy.
I’ve only tried to get an answer from you (you remember?), and now I have at least a response from you.
Sticks out tongue
Ah, yes, you will have to forgive my slow responses. Work nowadays takes up a majority of my time and soon going to school at the same time will also.
I’ll reply to that post and thread later. I haven’t forgotten.
If I may answer anymore of your other questions let me know.
Sure, I forgive you.
Oh, there’s no hurry.
Those who answer the question whether machines will completely replace all human beings with YES also say that the elites will be replaced, if they say elites will be human beings when it comes to replace them. All human beings! Completely replaced!
So, Tyler, do you want to change your vote again? 
I still stick by my answer that there are many variances and probabilities within all of this where I can’t make any definite statements.
What you are talking about is just one probable outcome while there are still a couple of others which I’ve addressed here that are equally possible.
The assertion that machines will replace “ALL” human being is risible.
You need to put me in the “I think this question is stupid obviously the answer if NO” column.
The clue is in the word “all”.
I more suspect that the “clue” is in the phrase, “I … is stupid obviously … if NO”"
I think a wait and see attitude to give ample time for the benefit of doubt, that perhaps someone(s) between the two extremes of majority and minority positions, even be it 1%, is perhaps not entirely dismissible. It is sometimes the unexpected, the least likely odd event, that usually turns things around to the desired benefit of the majority. Let’s not get carried away by seemingly inconsistent changes of opinion, until all the chips, well most, are in.
“Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise… until it is too late to choose otherwise.”
Except, it's never really to late to choose. What is too late? Where is the line to be drawn? It may be too late from the very beginning.............but, who is to say that should bar at least a modicum of faith based hope to turn things around?
Really?
Have you ever thought about what your life would be like if you could go back, maintaining your knowledge, and live it again? = “too late”.
Children are raised poorly and do stupid things - “too late” to raise them better.
Adults misunderstand and do stupid things, permanent social record = “too late”.
Blinded suicide victims arrange for their own deaths; pills, rooftops, bridges = “too late”.
Presidents attack other countries. The war is on = “too late” to prevent it.
Politicians make false claims and tell lies to the public = “too late” to ever be trusted again.
People get hypnotized by lusts, such as drugs or world conquering ambitions = “too late” to take a wiser road.
Humans replace humans with a race of androids = “too late” to save the species.
Reality has limited forgiveness.
I will say this much. Look to 90% of the military being replaced by robots and drones somewhere around 2025.
Assuming we don’t nuke the entire planet before then…
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNPJMk2fgJU[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SLEtVlU15Q[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPoK1ANL6rU[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BT0S0WImN1o[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ci7EFmO260E[/youtube]
For fun:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbto4mTGv1s[/youtube]
James: Erasmus wouldn’t have succeeded with the enlightenment, had he given up on the horrible plague of the dark ages. Hiroshima lost millions, and yet one baby, surviving still merits continuation. Hiroshima today is doing well today, excepting the grim reminders. It is life’s wonder to discount numberless casualties in favor of those lucky few, who may carry on to seek a better world. And goes with mechanization, hopefully it will carry on to the benefit of those still having a hopefully bright future.