Will heathendom (pagandom) bring freedom back to us?

Why is it that nobody seems to know what hedonism is? I have been getting ticked at the word being thrown as it is.

Hedonism and monotheism. Okay. And what is your “real statement”?

Hedonism has been existing for a long time, and when it “will lead into pur hedonism”, as you said, will that be the “black hole” as a social metaphor, the “singularity” because of the most extreme individualism?

No. That would be the opposite, “an ambient field of chaotic affectance”, soon to automatically particlize. And create the nastiest form of dictatorial rule ever imagined. One creates a dictatorial regime, by trying to annihilate it.
“What doesn’t kill it, makes it stronger.”

According to the current physicists the pre-condition of forming a “black hole” is the mass of a stellar object (mostly a star with more than 3.2 masses of our sun [cp. the so called “Oppenheimer-Volkoff-Limit”]) which later becomes this “black hole”. But what is the pre-condition according to your RM:AO?

All it takes (as the physicist are aware) is an increase in affectance density (“energy density”) over a larger physical space than a particle could sustain.

That is why they suspect that it might dissipate. As a particle, it would have to shrink. But what they don’t show the understanding of, is that the new “super-particle” would automatically begin absorbing “mass” from the space itself, something that they cannot detect or currently imagine it seems (although Krauss has indicated some understanding in that regard).

What it takes to cause a black hole is not a huge star, but rather merely a high concentration of energy into a small space, larger than a monoparticle could sustain. Once it is formed, if it is not seriously isolated from any mass field (as in far, far into the inter-galactic space) it stands a good chance of never stopping from absorbing energy endlessly.

When I say "according to the current physicists“, you don’t accept that, do you? Not seldom you seem to overread the term “according to the current physicists”. I mean the statements of the current physicists, although they are mainstream physicists, „exist“, don’t they? This mainstream physicists say that the gravity is probably the most important force, you say that affectance or electromagnetic force is most important. Why should they always be “wrong”? They say a mass of 3.2 masses of our sun are needed for forming a “black hole”, you say: “What it takes to cause a black hole is not a huge star, but rather merely a high concentration of energy into a small space, larger than a monoparticle could sustain”. Who is right?

“Who is Right” has become a critically important question, even more important than “What is right”. I have found that there is a large gap between truth and mainstream. And that is why Science was founded on “Nullius in Verba”, “take no one’s word”. And that is also why I created RM, so that individuals, without billions of dollars of equipment and education can find out for themselves what is principally true.

When it comes to the principles of the universe, anyone who can logically deduce, can know what must be true, without being told by mainstream anything.

I also have found (for a very long time, b.t.w.) that there is a large gap between truth and mainstream, and I am interested in what you have created.

Which religion or religious confession would or should be appropriate for your sam corporations, James?

SAM doesn’t care. SAM allows for and expects learning. In the long run, Reality is what it is and will be leading the way. Although more altruistic people would be far more comfortable learning to be intimately honest.

“SAM” works only when the number of population of the “communical particle” remains very low.

True. It cannot grow large and still be a SAM corporation, communal particle.

To get a large gathering, one must have very many relatively independent SAM corps. who network together for trade. This constitutes a “molecule of particles” that grows into the body of Man.

The biggest challenge is the self-containedness, the sufficiency, the autarchy (autarky).

With proper use of technology, that isn’t the issue that it used to be.

Actually the Greeks with their “city-states” and Moses with his regional Pharisees, had the right general idea, but lacked precision and required too many people. Technology resolved both of those concerns and allows for the freedom of the city-state method by using extremely small “cities”, SAM Corporations.

Jesus had everything right but didn’t mention the issue of momentum (too much quite peace void of the necessary momentous harmony). The Catholics then compounded that concern by trying to establish single a world order, the “Holy Roman Empire” - went the wrong direction, just as the Globzis of today.

Man keeps trying to bring it ALL under one rule, not understanding that the only “supreme ruler” has to be Reality itself and that requires what we call “localized democracy and culture”.

The rulers (Glozis) can forbid the access to the technology!

Well, they already do that. I mean that one must use what one has, but use it properly.

There is a realm of science that is far, far above public science. And they have technology to match. They are the depicted “space aliens” in films.

Eg;

Here and now would fit the following from another thread:

Where are the heathens posting?

From another thread:

The logical continuation, culmination, and completion of the so-called “revolutions”: “French revolution”, “Communism” / “Nationalsocialism”, and now the “Feminism” as hell on earth.

In comparison to that which follows they always start harmlessly:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzvlQ0hy7kg[/youtube][youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr_SgD5cORs[/youtube]

All these “projects” end in hell.