We have only theories about the origin of life on Earth. One is that the planet was seeded when organic chemicals contained in comets met warm springs at the bottom of the sea (Crick). Another is that pools of organic soup produced nucleic acids, which formed archaebacteria. If one believes God did it, the argument is always how on the scientific side. On the emotional side, the argument is why.
good way to put it…I don’t know about the why thing…does anyone…we may be able to know exactly about the origin of life…we are learning about the pre-biotic chemical evolution…crick is still an idea…I like the urey idea better…
Why does Science and Religion have to be separated here? Even if a God did it, the present Science remains the same.
And one can still, with or without a creator,within one’s totality, stand in awe of it.
WHY can also be uttered within its totality. The answer to that is found within each Self’s core.
Why does Science and Religion have to be separated here? Even if a God did it, the present Science remains the same.
And one can still, with or without a creator,within one’s totality, stand in awe of it.
WHY can also be uttered within its totality. The answer to that is found within each Self’s core.
Oh, I think that within your core, turtle, there is a answer or response - as Irrelleus said…wonder and awe are an answer.
A response does not only come from the mouth. Most “real” responses come automatically, almost without one’s own volition, when it comes to responses at our core.
Unless we’re really self-aware, we may not even be aware of them.
You already know the answer. The path is living by the Golden Rule. It addresses both your well-being and that of others. It’s not easy to follow in a sick society; but it is the only way beyond that.