Universe and Time

999999 in relation to what? Is 1 unit the size of an atom, a star, what?

In relation to geometry, silly.

For an example, one circle is 360° no matter how big the circle is, it’s always 360°.

Now look at the radius of our planet, Earth. 3960 Miles. That is 11 Circles (360 x 11).
Now look at the radius of our moon, Moon. 1080 Miles. That is 3 Circles (360 x 3)

Now look at my numbers again, then align them with geometrical laws and maybe you will see what I see. If not, then I may just have to hold your hand.

360 is an arbitrary value. Degtorad is needed to convert degrees to radians, so that they can be compatible with Pi based computations.

I could make a system that uses 1000 degrees instead of 360 degrees. A circle has infinitesmal degrees.

360 is arbitrary when the Universe designed our planet’s radius out of 11 perfect circles (360 x 11) and our moon with 3 perfect circles (3 x 360)? You know what? You’re a mortal compared to the divine design that makes any of this possible. You’re the one that’s arbitrary, not the laws of geometry. You’re insignificant compared to these numbers.

False, our Earth is made up of 10^50 perfect circles, commonly known as atoms.

The physical template we are perceiving on the physical dimension, the Earth’s radius is 11 x 360 and the Moon’s radius is 3 x 360. Do you have any idea how extraordinary this is? It scares people to know how simple the Universe really is, including you. Hence why you’re dodging it.

How can I dodge a ball that has a radius of 11x360? I don’t even know what unit it is relative to, in order to judge the scale at which I can dodge, hence, I cannot dodge such a thing without first discerning the relative scale of it’s subdivision within Reality.

You’re very terrible at geometry. These are precise mathematical proportions of our planets, and you shrug it off because you’re geometrically incompetent. Please do study the geometry of your own planet and moon, instead of going around spreading false information and arbitrary information. You will only make a fool out of yourself by attempting to condescend my work with your ignorance of the subject. Nobody can rival my work, and you’re not going to be any exception. Go do your research, instead of typing a whole lot to say a whole lot of nothing because at the end of the day, my knowledge is superior to your begging the question games that were invented by Man to escape from intellectual responsibility.

[b]Your very skeletal structure is composed of 126 Appendicular Bones and 80 Axial Bones. 126 x 80 = 10080.

Earth’s Radius = 3960 Miles
Moon’s Radius = 1080 Miles

3960 + 1080 + 3960 + 1080 = 10080.

10080 x 3.142857 = 31680. (The precise mathematical formula of the Earth & Moon matrix.[/b]

My mathematical work explains The Da Vinci Code. So any fool that denies my work is just that, a fool.

You must be joking. TYou don’t multiply the radius by 360. Who taught you mathematics? 360 is the equivalent of zero, degrees use the modulus function. So you are litterally multiplying it by zero :laughing:

Your work explains the DaVinci code alright. Africa is balls. Keep on pulling arbitrary numbers out your ass. The moon is three if it makes you happy. If you multiply arbitrary numbers youll find any signficance you want, it’s quite easy actually.

You clearly have been fed false information. Nothing you say has any regard to reality. Everything I say adheres to sacred geometry, sacred secrets, sacred literature and sacred architecture. Notice how you use words, not formulas? It’s because you have no real numbers. All the numbers you’re using are fake, and only used as tools to support your blatant ignorance on the matter of mathematical realities.

Like I said, the radius of Earth is 3960 Miles. That is 360 x 11, which is 11 circles, since you’re a moron and I have to hold on tight to your membranes because they lack mental acuity.
And the moon’s radius is 1080 Miles. That is 360 x 3.
Last time I checked, they make more sense than you ever will.

So if 11 moons fit into a 2dimensional earth, the moon should be 1, not 3, What ass did you pull that from, dipshit? How do you explain that?

Simple. You. Have. Fake. Information. That. Has. Nothing. Do. With. The. Existing. Framework. Of. All. Layers. Of. Dimension. Ergo. You. Are. Living. Inside. Your. Own. Head.

That’s why you called earth 2-D, when it’s 3-D. Hence “4 Corners”. Hence the Diameter aligns with the Circumference (3-D).

Sorry for being mean, it is clear that you are just mentally impaired in some way.

Are’nt schizophrenics who write self-referential connections also, living in their head, because they are unable to explain themselves in any rational, conceivable way, without dumping piles of delusional sounding numbers?

Your proofs are litterally 3+8+4 = 6…And now I feel like I’m on the short bus again…

Never said it wasn’t 3d. I just said 11 moons would fit within the perimeter of a 2d earth. Not everyone is special like you.

The entire Universe was built with 123456789.

Just because you’re an ignorant mortal, doesn’t mean numbers cannot exceed your level of comprehension – they created you and your ignorance to be frank.

Where is your mathematical formula? All I see is words from you. Explain why 11 moons would fit within the permeter of a 2-D Earth.


Was there ever any doubt?

If you begin with 2 cups, you have (1/10)[1]2[/b]
With 3 cups, you have (1/10)[2]3[/b]
And with 10 cups, you have (1/10)[3]10[/b]

It is an ontological definition (“≡”), not an equation.

Well, I have been known to make mistakes, but you’ll have to show me exactly where.

Yes, and an infinite cube is infA^3
…unless you are using the real-number system so as to include decimals, then it is infA[4]6[/b].

That statement doesn’t appear to make any sense. If by “step-value” you mean one infinitesimal, such is a matter of choice and ontological definition/declaration. Any amount can be used as long as it is consistent throughout.

It has nothing to do with particles. And even if it did, what happens when you divide the smallest thing (an infinitesimal) into an infinite thing? You get infA^2.

I’m afraid with that, you got into a little too much nonsense for me. And the universe is NOT finite. What makes you think that it is?


  1. b ↩︎

  2. b ↩︎

  3. b ↩︎

  4. b ↩︎

It appears to me…

That your numbers have no relevance to reality.

What about the opposite one: logic as a subset of mathematics? There were and are people who liked and like that very much. They think that hiding something behind mathematics is easier than hiding something behind logic. :wink: