Iām a prolific slacker. I insist you go first. You seem to be acquainted with some of my past writings by the sounds of it anyways with the subject youāve chosen to debate me with.
The criteria seems well enough.
Iām a prolific slacker. I insist you go first. You seem to be acquainted with some of my past writings by the sounds of it anyways with the subject youāve chosen to debate me with.
The criteria seems well enough.
I had a hunch you were a prolific slacker, and in fact the design of this challenge, as well as the topic, were really just a suggestion I gave you not too long ago turned into a debate.
Anyway, we need a judge and/or MC. I propose Uccisore.
j/k. Mr. Reasonable, any interest?
I propose Gib or WWIII.
I will be honored to judge the debate impartially.
HaHaHa: Carleas:I had a hunch you were a prolific slacker, and in fact the design of this challenge, as well as the topic, were really just a suggestion I gave you not too long ago turned into a debate.
Anyway, we need a judge and/or MC. I propose Uccisore.
j/k. Mr. Reasonable, any interest?
I propose Gib or WWIII.
I will be honored to judge the debate impartially.
Excellent.
To confirm, hereās the outline as I understand it:
Claim: āHumans are livestockā
Arguing in favor: HaHaHa
Opposing: Carleas
Format: 7 posts total, three from Hahaha and four from Carleas, as follows:
Post #1) Carleas (100-150 words)
Post #2) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #3) Carleas (200-300 words)
Post #4) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #5) Carleas (200-300 words)
Post #6) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #7) Carleas (100-150 words)
Participants will have 3 days for their posts measured from whenever their opponent last posted, except the 1st and 7th posts for which Carleas will have 1 day.
No images are to be used in the debate.
Honorable and Impartial Judge: WW_III_ANGRY
If thatās all right, Iāll start the threads after I get confirmation and post my first post 1 day later (since Iām only writing a half-post).
To confirm, hereās the outline as I understand it:
Claim: āHumans are livestockā
Arguing in favor: HaHaHa
Opposing: CarleasFormat: 7 posts total, three from Hahaha and four from Carleas, as follows:
Post #1) Carleas (100-150 words)
Post #2) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #3) Carleas (200-300 words)
Post #4) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #5) Carleas (200-300 words)
Post #6) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #7) Carleas (100-150 words)Participants will have 3 days for their posts measured from whenever their opponent last posted, except the 1st and 7th posts for which Carleas will have 1 day.
No images are to be used in the debate.
Honorable and Impartial Judge: WW_III_ANGRY
If thatās all right, Iāll start the threads after I get confirmation and post my first post 1 day later (since Iām only writing a half-post).
Sounds good.
I will be honored to judge the debate impartially.
I second that, but I guess WW_III beat me to it.
I will gladly sit on the sidelines, however, and make rude comments as I see fit.
WW_III_ANGRY:I will be honored to judge the debate impartially.
I second that, but I guess WW_III beat me to it.
I will gladly sit on the sidelines, however, and make rude comments as I see fit.
I welcome your commentary Gib.
Carleas, it should be known in our conversation that I donāt classify all human beings as livestock but instead just a majority only.
Those that are not livestock are either farmers or plantation owners. Keep this in mind during your constructed openings.
Of course all of this is metaphors dealing with the human hierarchy itself.
Alrighty rock and roll.
OK, itās on. Iāll post my intro by roughly 9am tomorrow.
I have a dentist appt today might be out most of the day, fyi
No worries, your judge duties donāt kick in until the end of the debate, so youāve got plenty of time to recover from the dentist.
To confirm, hereās the outline as I understand it:
Claim: āHumans are livestockā
Arguing in favor: HaHaHa
Opposing: CarleasFormat: 7 posts total, three from Hahaha and four from Carleas, as follows:
Post #1) Carleas (100-150 words)
Post #2) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #3) Carleas (200-300 words)
Post #4) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #5) Carleas (200-300 words)
Post #6) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #7) Carleas (100-150 words)Participants will have 3 days for their posts measured from whenever their opponent last posted, except the 1st and 7th posts for which Carleas will have 1 day.
No images are to be used in the debate.
Honorable and Impartial Judge: WW_III_ANGRY
If thatās all right, Iāll start the threads after I get confirmation and post my first post 1 day later (since Iām only writing a half-post).
How can this be fair; when Carleas gets the first word and the last?
Carleas:To confirm, hereās the outline as I understand it:
Claim: āHumans are livestockā
Arguing in favor: HaHaHa
Opposing: CarleasFormat: 7 posts total, three from Hahaha and four from Carleas, as follows:
Post #1) Carleas (100-150 words)
Post #2) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #3) Carleas (200-300 words)
Post #4) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #5) Carleas (200-300 words)
Post #6) Hahaha (200-300 words)
Post #7) Carleas (100-150 words)Participants will have 3 days for their posts measured from whenever their opponent last posted, except the 1st and 7th posts for which Carleas will have 1 day.
No images are to be used in the debate.
Honorable and Impartial Judge: WW_III_ANGRY
If thatās all right, Iāll start the threads after I get confirmation and post my first post 1 day later (since Iām only writing a half-post).
How can this be fair; when Carleas gets the first word and the last?
Precisely.
How can this be fair; when Carleas gets the first word and the last?
In my defense Iāll note that I suggested HaHaHa take firsts and lasts, so I wasnāt trying to pull a fast one on anybody.
And I actually do think this is fair in principle, though in practice it didnāt feel that way. If the posts were longer, and the opening and closing were a little less than half the length of a normal post (more like a third), I think it would be fair. Just need to turn some dials to find the sweet spot.
Lev Muishkin:How can this be fair; when Carleas gets the first word and the last?
In my defense Iāll note that I suggested HaHaHa take firsts and lasts, so I wasnāt trying to pull a fast one on anybody.
And I actually do think this is fair in principle, though in practice it didnāt feel that way. If the posts were longer, and the opening and closing were a little less than half the length of a normal post (more like a third), I think it would be fair. Just need to turn some dials to find the sweet spot.
So, a rematch then?
Still deeply inactive.
As inactive as Walt Disney in his Cryo-Chamber under Ice Mountain.
Still deeply inactive.
As inactive as Walt Disney in his Cryo-Chamber under Ice Mountain.
I concur on that.