What person A is good at, person B may be worse at, what person B is good at, person A may be worse at. It goes on.
It’s a cycle of single/varietal aspect “superiority” that creates a balance/equality between humanity, this cycle is what contributes to evolution by peoples differences/superiorities.
In any given moment, one is able to deal with the challenges that are present or one is not able. One succeeds or one fails. The one who succeeds is superior to the one who fails.
Well is common sense genetic? Because I can see a lot of people dying because they lack it. Perhaps not all of the failure is due to genetics, I was just meaning the superiority aspect between peoples genetic capabilities. But I do get what you’re saying now. I guess it just depends on when and how they fail in order to be killed by it, or the consistency of it.
Well not all of it is right? Like tribes who live in the wild, they don’t rely on social constructs as much as one living in the city
The two will have completely different skill sets and survival methods.
Perhaps intelligence really is partially bound to environment. A more comfy environment negates the need to continue to learn, not to say people don’t enjoy it, like us here. Once an environment is comfortable enough, people usually just carry on with daily routine instead of having to really survive like those in the wild or a place that tests you.
I wouldn’t want to be king, I wouldn’t want the responsibility.
The power I want is one of a profiteer working in the shadows. Those types of people live longer considering kings are assassinated and replaced quite frequently.
I’m all about unnoticeable invisible power. I would never become a politician.
Well a king is public, most exposed for being controlled, manipulated, killed, etc.
I prefer anarchy (people ruling themselves) over appointing a Sauron to rule. So if I were king of civilization I would distribute all of my power to all corners of the world, equally. Or at least distribute it wherever I “rule” anyways.
That is what actual politics is about.
A competition over who can distribute the most wealth/power in the best method in order to take care of it’s people in the best way possible.
What we see, the current reality of fake politics - Millions of dollars spent in propaganda campaign ads. (Most often the usual smear campaigns in order to ruin and destroy your opponents image.)
I agree Arty. Well, I agreed before your edits and whatnots. HHH, you would not distribute anything equally. You’re a taker, not a giver.
Civilization is the plastique, resembling a mannequin from another world with lots of retarded degrees of choices that amount to nothing valuable. The important dreamers are dead. The thinkers have taken over and created Hell, here, now. With their words and lies using those words and oh, how manipulation is reveled in.
Not the thinkers, it’s just the successful. The good fortuned have conquered the world, they created a place where not even the thinkers can get rid of them.
I am a combination of the dreamer, thinker and perhaps the hard worker/jack of all trades.
To backtrack for a sec, philosophical rig(dig)-ression
from the point of view of French psycho-existential
analysis, by way of segmentation of body parts, is viewed as a deliberate fetish, but more so a tour
d’force originating from the basic strands of social fragmentation.
The symbolic -memetic-splitting of body organs , corresponding to the idea of them as machines, can alter such correspondence through symbolic-machine interaction, reducing the particular genetic trait’s facility from an intentional-human to a deterministic machine like specialized focus. (Fetish). This focus of interest, cuts up the general idea into specific disconnected genetic parts.