Choosing evil is choosing a path that reduces anentropy. It doesn’t matter what is declared or dictated as “Evil”.
No. You are wrong. What he is (and you are) saying is like saying “everything I say is true because it is possible to be true”. That is not how science works and how science should work, because, if it does, then it is no science anymore. Moreover: He is misusing a philosopher of the 18th century as his witness for his 21st century “statements”. There is no morality gene. Period.
No.
Furthermore, most of us don’t even get the opportunity to choose anymore, whatever is deemed “evil” is part of some artificially constructed penal code. And half the time it’s not even evil.
Choosing evil is choosing a path that reduces anentropy. It doesn’t matter what is declared or dictated as “Evil”.
People have to learn what “good” and “evil” mean. That is a fact. And this fact is the reason why morality is almost always misused in education, regardless whether in kindergartens, schools, universities, or by the mass media, the political system.
People have to learn what “good” and “evil” mean. That is a fact. And this fact is the reason why morality is almost always misused in education, regardless whether in kindergartens, schools, universities, or by the mass media, the political system.
Yep.
Choosing evil is choosing a path that reduces anentropy. It doesn’t matter what is declared or dictated as “Evil”.
How many infants comprehend Anentropy (not counting the ones on this forum)?
Kriswest:You cannot worship one with out the other . The fact you identify evil as you do, is worship.
So if I identity an inbound missile, about to blow me up, I am worshipping the missile as well? If I identity the random guy who robbed me, I am worshiping him too?
Wow, you have a child’s view.
It is about intent,thought, not object.
To worship:
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worship
What most do not understand is that the opposite of all the positive is still worship. To truly worship good you must also hold devotion to its opposite. Instead of knee jerk reply . Give it time and truly think about it.
Arminius:People have to learn what “good” and “evil” mean. That is a fact. And this fact is the reason why morality is almost always misused in education, regardless whether in kindergartens, schools, universities, or by the mass media, the political system.
Yep.
James S Saint:Choosing evil is choosing a path that reduces anentropy. It doesn’t matter what is declared or dictated as “Evil”.
How many infants comprehend Anentropy (not counting the ones on this forum)?
Infants learn and want to learn (they are very much interested in learning), whereas many ILP members seem to have stopped learning.
Evil requires intent.
As does good
Ultimate Philosophy 1001: Kriswest:You cannot worship one with out the other . The fact you identify evil as you do, is worship.
So if I identity an inbound missile, about to blow me up, I am worshipping the missile as well? If I identity the random guy who robbed me, I am worshiping him too?
Wow, you have a child’s view.
It is about intent,thought, not object.
To worship:merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worship
What most do not understand is that the opposite of all the positive is still worship. To truly worship good you must also hold devotion to its opposite. Instead of knee jerk reply . Give it time and truly think about it.
I’ve already thought about it in one second. I firmly believe that you are talking out of your bottom.
Ultimate Philosophy 1001:No, that’s such a wrong headed way of looking at it.
That’s like a blueprint of a house, and you say the house doesn’t exist, because you look at individual pages of the blueprints and don’t see a house.
No. You are wrong. What he is (and you are) saying is like saying “everything I say is true because it is possible to be true”. That is not how science works and how science should work, because, if it does, then it is no science anymore. Moreover: He is misusing a philosopher of the 18th century as his witness for his 21st century “statements”. There is no morality gene. Period.
So do you believe morality is not influenced by genetics at all.
Mice are as moral as humans, preying mantis are as moral as mice correct?
Choosing evil is choosing a path that reduces anentropy. It doesn’t matter what is declared or dictated as “Evil”.
Is anentropy local or non-local? In other words, is personal good the same as universal good?
Prismatic567: James S Saint:Remove the DNA potential of growing a human who commits acts of evil and you will will have a corpse.
Ignorant again.
Still accusing of his own guilt.
Prismatic567:Once we are aware of the ultimate root causes we can strive towards dealing with the DNA and neural connectivity in the brain in the future, e.g.
“After we have the trial, we will hang him”.You already proclaim the “root cause” as being the DNA (the foundation of the person). But then you say once you “discover” (aka. “create enough statistics to convince people of our decision”), you will decide what to do about it.
…never, never license this guy for a gun.
Prismatic567:1. Genomics
Within the next 100 years it is possible for humanity to manipulate any DNA factors that contribute to ‘evil’ [as defined].
Obviously there are many potential of complicated side-effects in manipulating the DNA but it is nevertheless a possibility and executable when we have developed fool proofs methods.2. Connectome
A connectome \kəˈnɛktoʊm\ is a comprehensive map of neural connections in the brain, and may be thought of as its “wiring diagram”. More broadly, a connectome would include the mapping of all neural connections within an organism’s nervous system.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ConnectomeWithin the next 100 years, it is possible for humanity to map out all [if not the major and critical ones] the neural connectivity in the human brain.
With various technology, e.g. nano-technology and other advance technology humanity would be able to promote stronger inhibitors that will enable one to modulate the potentially evil impulses before they turned ‘evil’ in reality.Within the next 100 years or more humanity would be able to have access to a diverse range of advance knowledge, technology and self-development programs to manage their potentially evil impulses.
In the meantime where we have people with ostrich-mentality like you, how are we to progress effectively.
Your defacto definition of “Evil” is “Whatever our socialist regime declares unwanted behavior”.
You are proving to be a true sociopath.
Ignorant again.
You ignored what I wrote earlier;
I am not proposing that we do something to the DNA and neural connectivity now. What is critical is for the majority to understand the ultimate root causes as mentioned in the OP and other posts herein.
Note I mentioned the above are possibilities that humanity can look into in the future.
Whatever steps humanity take and implement in the future [say next 100 years] must be absolutely fool proof.
Your defacto definition of “Evil” is “Whatever our socialist regime declares unwanted behavior”.
I have to say the above view [straw man] and inventing definitions on behalf of others is very stupid.
James S Saint:Choosing evil is choosing a path that reduces anentropy. It doesn’t matter what is declared or dictated as “Evil”.
Is anentropy local or non-local? In other words, is personal good the same as universal good?
The bad thing is that the only way to achieve a perfect balance, one must consider literally ALL things. The good thing is that there is room for mistakes and forgivenesses. So the local must be balanced with the regional under an understanding of how to compensate for misalignment without throwing the balance even further off. That is the purpose of the SAM Coop.
Ignorant again.
That seems to be your only defense left. You can’t even define the words you are using, so you (in almost every post) have to insult whoever is disagreeing with you.
Prismatic567:Ignorant again.
That seems to be your only defense left. You can’t even define the words you are using, so you (in almost every post) have to insult whoever is disagreeing with you.
Can’t be an insult if it is a demonstrated and justified fact.
Kriswest:Wow, you have a child’s view.
It is about intent,thought, not object.
To worship:merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worship
What most do not understand is that the opposite of all the positive is still worship. To truly worship good you must also hold devotion to its opposite. Instead of knee jerk reply . Give it time and truly think about it.I’ve already thought about it in one second. I firmly believe that you are talking out of your bottom.
Too bad your brain can only manage one second of thought or you might learn new perspectives and ideas rather than cling to old or warped ideas.
Seems like you are the one clinging to old warped ideas. You can’t even get an insult right, girl, I never said my brain can only handle 1 second of thought…you can’t even make insults that are logically coherent.
Good: the flow of energy down the path of equal resistance
Bad: the flow of energy down the path of less resistance (under-performance) or more resistance (over-performance)
The bad thing is that the only way to achieve a perfect balance, one must consider literally ALL things. The good thing is that there is room for mistakes and forgivenesses. So the local must be balanced with the regional under an understanding of how to compensate for misalignment without throwing the balance even further off. That is the purpose of the SAM Coop.
I don’t think that life is an effort to maintain some sort of equilibrium. I think that life is energy flow. Energy flow is an expansive process that seeks the path of near-equal resistance. Balancing, in this sense, merely refers to choosing the right path. Bad is defined as energy flow down the path of less resistance (under-performance, waste of potential) or down the path of more resistance (over-performance.)
Seems like you are the one clinging to old warped ideas. You can’t even get an insult right, girl, I never said my brain can only handle 1 second of thought…you can’t even make insults that are logically coherent.
I didn’t not say it could only handle 1 second. Try slowing down and actually comprehend what you read.
Ultimate Philosophy 1001:Seems like you are the one clinging to old warped ideas. You can’t even get an insult right, girl, I never said my brain can only handle 1 second of thought…you can’t even make insults that are logically coherent.
I didn’t not say it could only handle 1 second. Try slowing down and actually comprehend what you read.
I say the same to you.