DNA wise ALL humans are born with a POTENTIAL to be Evil

Can’t be an insult if it is a demonstrated and justified fact.

Too bad your brain can only manage one second of thought or you might learn new perspectives and ideas rather than cling to old or warped ideas.

Seems like you are the one clinging to old warped ideas. You can’t even get an insult right, girl, I never said my brain can only handle 1 second of thought…you can’t even make insults that are logically coherent.

Good: the flow of energy down the path of equal resistance
Bad: the flow of energy down the path of less resistance (under-performance) or more resistance (over-performance)

I don’t think that life is an effort to maintain some sort of equilibrium. I think that life is energy flow. Energy flow is an expansive process that seeks the path of near-equal resistance. Balancing, in this sense, merely refers to choosing the right path. Bad is defined as energy flow down the path of less resistance (under-performance, waste of potential) or down the path of more resistance (over-performance.)

I didn’t not say it could only handle 1 second. Try slowing down and actually comprehend what you read.

I say the same to you.

All you are doing is twisting words and putting your own delusional meanings into it.

If I worship good porn, it doesn’t mean I worship bad porn.

Just guessing but, you really did not study the definitions did you.

That's progress for you!.jpg

One Liner,

Ask this little guy what he thinks of it.
Does progress ALSO come with solutions?

cbc.ca/news/technology/polar … -1.3542836

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worship

Yea,

Life is dynamic equilibrium, e.g.

Good and Evil in the case of the OP should be viewed within the Moral/Ethics perspective [btw no theological considerations.].
What is absolutely good and evil together with their variations should be defined and clearly stated based on empirical evidences and philosophical justifications. For example it is not difficult to agree that genocides, mass rapes, and the likes are obviously evil as defined. Those who commit such acts will believe their evil acts are good, but such arguments can be easily refuted.

Once we have established what is supposedly to be absolutely good or evil from the Moral perspective [Theory] we can implement various Ethics [applied] strategies to manage what is to be good and avoid evil. Such a process will be quite complicated but very feasible on a progressive and continuous improvement approach.

There is a difference between growth and balance. Growth is increase in size, balance is maintenance of size. Thus, a self-directed being that aims for growth will strive to increase its size over time, whereas a self-directed being that aims for equilibrium is not interested in growth as much as it is interested in preserving its size.

If we understand being as quantity of energy, then self-directed growth would be choosing the path of greatest gain/loss ratio whereas self-maintained equilibrium would be choosing the path of gain/loss ratio that is nearest to one.

In the former case, beings desire to gain as much energy as possible. In the latter case, beings desire to exchange as little energy as possible.

Life can be either of the two. Nonetheless, I consider growth to be superior to balancing, thus, life proper.

The Tao symbol represent growth [change] and balance in complementarity.
Point is whatever the change [growth or otherwise], it must always leveraged strongly in complementarity with balance in terms of dynamic equilibrium as life of optimal well-being should be.
This is a central principle in most of the Eastern spirituality and religions.

The two patterns are different. Either you strive towards growth or you strive towards balance. You cannot have it both ways. That would be dishonest.

The Tao symbol represents movement towards balance, not growth.

The Tao symbol represents movement with balance and change which inevitably will involve growth or reduction.

What is special with the Tao symbol is it represent p and not-p in complementarity which is seemingly a logical contradiction but that is nevertheless a reality. Thus we can have it both ways in reality.

To lend some credibility to my point from authority;
Note Neil Bohr was inspired by the principle of complementarity of the Tao symbol to discover one of the basic principle of Quantum physics. This is why he had the Tao symbol in his family Coats of Arms.

You cannot have it both ways. These are two different patterns. You are trying to erase this difference.

You can have growth subordinated to balance (the Tao symbol) or balance subordinated to growth.

If you set aside the symbols of the past, use their shoulders to move forward or change then you can.
Too much do we cling to our ancestors education and fail to go beyond. These educated humans could not have wanted humanity to stop and just be stagnant from their work. They dreamed of advancement for humans, they were stepping stones not final goals.
Too many here and at other forums are stagnate with renowned people’s information. Not one Person here is dumb. Deliberately ignorant maybe and that includes myself at times. You want true growth and change? Then let’s work together not attack difference.

Whichever, the test is to put it into practice to improve one’s well being.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tai_chi


Yang Chengfu in a posture from
the Yang-style t’ai chi ch’uan solo form
known as Single Whip c. 1931