Islam is very nihilistic.
Nobody said anything of the sort.
So in the ‘deeply religious world’ a girl is constantly watched and controlled so she can’t do anything wrong. Is that what you are saying?
And you are also saying that she freely chooses what she does??
Equalizing in what sense?
Access to education?
Freedom to choose clothing?
Selecting a marriage partner?
Decision making authority, both direct and indirect, intentional and inadvertent, overt and covert.
It is well known for a very long time that any truly 50/50 partnership has a high probability of failure (and for understandable reasons). The strongest male-female relationships are Dom/sub.
Men ought to make decisions for women?
In principle, should not every individual make his/her own decisions with respect to his/her own life?
It’s not important what Trudeau is saying, it’s in which direction the society is going. Canada is a liberal society and this is a direction its going.
The current adult generation is not really that important - it’s the children and the next generations that are targeted. He’s may be saying one thing to the parents, but once they are gone, the society and the social norms will take over. The next generations will not be the same.
He’s a feminist too: youtube.com/watch?v=FUtRnkm1GlY
So is Obama: glamour.com/story/glamour-ex … looks-like
No one makes all of their decisions for themselves (without immediately going insane and becoming another sociopath). Every other person provides structure, within which each person can make decisions. When you remove that structure by making everything the same, rationality gets lost because all roads lead to the same result … boring, idle, stagnation. Mindless and aimless emotionalism then rules the roost. There are no goals to achieve (a masculine necessity in life). There is no security assured (a feminine necessity in life). Extremes are tried and more invented, but there is only very short lived satisfaction because nothing is good enough of a catharsis to fill the void of tomorrow’s inevitable drab, mundane, boredom. And the more they try, the worse it gradually gets (The Never Ending Story scenario).
Without guardrails, goals, and rules to provide structure, more tailored to fit the needs of the individual (masculine for males, feminine for females), misery, insanity, sociopathological justifications, and emotionalism follow. The idea that the homosapian brain is born as an entirely blank slate is and always was utter nonsense.
The male and the female have different structure needs within their need compendium. The female is more of a “tell me what you(all) want of me” and the male is more of a “okay, where are we going” type of innate attitude (after the more youthful, “what can I get away with” attitude).
Male: What is our Goal?
Female: How can I help you get us there?
As is most often the case, she becomes an inadvertent guardrail and goal for his demands that she must obey. Both become more hopeful of a full and meaningful life as each senses that they are doing what works for each other (or what the religious refer to as “going with God”). They form a natural team, far greater than either alone.
Evolution has ensured that those basic attitudes are DNA engendered. As Man removes them, structure is lost, as is homosapian. They got there by naturally rational reasoning. Remove nature in favor of artificial ideological constructs (“civility”, “socialism”) and natural reasoning goes with it.
Artificial structures only work well with artificial life.
You want evidence? Just look around.
One of the reason for segregation of women in Islam is because Allah [their God] stated the females are “dirty” in addition to loads of verses that reinforced misogyny.
I will provide the verses later or one can google for them easily.
Now if an all powerful God said so that women are dirty, unclean, worth less, etc. Muslim must listen, obey and practice what are stated and commanded, otherwise they could go to HELL and be tortured in the worst possible manner eternally as specified in the Quran.
So the Islam [partly] is inherently evil with regard to misogyny and contributed to terrible evils and violence committed on female Muslims by SOME evil prone Muslims [males and females].
In this case, PM Trudeau is indirectly complicit to the related sufferings of women in Canada that are related to this issue. [the women upstairs!! 
].
It doesn’t really matter WHY they do what they do, as long as it works better than what you are doing, besides which your WHY is not actually any better, despite what you believe.
When they gain due to what they do and you don’t, guess what?
Doesn’t really matter???
What did that come from?
Note the fundamental moral imperative of respecting the basic dignity of individual[s].
Relative the present era, misogyny is a significant element of evil.
What you do not see [seemingly] is this element of evil is one of the many terrible evil elements in the Quran [i.e. Islam-in-part] that culminated in a full range of terrible evils and violence inflicted upon mankind by SOME evil prone Muslims.
As such we should condemn every part and bits of evil oozing from that overall evil ethos of Islam, not Muslims btw.
Here is one example amongst the many types of evils and violence committed by SOME evil prone Muslims;
Those who are ignorant of what is really in the Quran, i.e. the terrible evil and violence element plus the misogyny verses, then praised Islam as a peaceful religion, deserved to be called ignorant b…ds. [like PM Trudeau in the OP] for they are ultimately & indirectly complicit to the real evils committed by SOME Muslims [not all] who are born with an active evil tendency.
Here are some verses where women are not presented in a good light;
in = mine.
2:222. They [Muslims] question thee (O Muhammad) concerning menstruation.
Say: It [menstruation] is an illness, so let women alone at such time and go not in unto them till they are cleansed.
And when they have purified themselves, then go in unto them as Allah hath enjoined upon you.
Truly Allah loveth those [Muslims] who turn unto Him, and loveth those [Muslims] who have a care for cleanness.
33:32. O ye wives of the Prophet! Ye are not like any other women. If ye keep [wives] your duty (to Allah), then be not soft of speech, lest he [infidel] in whose heart is a disease aspire (to you), but utter customary speech.
33:33. [Allahs’ Instructions to the wives]
And stay in your houses. Bedizen [dress tastelessly] not yourselves with the bedizenment of the Time of ignorance [of the past re Noah or Abraham]. Be regular in prayer, and pay the poor due [zakat], and obey Allah and His messenger. Allah’s wish is but to remove uncleanness far from you [wives], O Folk of the Household, and cleanse you with a thorough cleansing. [Women presumed unclean]
Elsewhere:
From Quran
with comments
Quran (4:11) - (Inheritance) “The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females” (see also verse 4:176). In Islam, sexism is mathematically established.
Quran (2:282) - (Court testimony) “And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not found then a man and two women.”
Muslim apologists offer creative explanations to explain why Allah felt that a man’s testimony in court should be valued twice as highly as a woman’s, but studies consistently show that women are actually less likely to tell lies than men, meaning that they make more reliable witnesses.
Quran (2:228) - “and the men are a degree above them [women]”
Quran (5:6) - “And if ye are unclean, purify yourselves. And if ye are sick or on a journey, or one of you cometh from the closet, or ye have had contact with women, and ye find not water, then go to clean, high ground and rub your faces and your hands with some of it”
Men are to rub dirt on their hands, if there is no water to purify them, following casual contact with a woman (such as shaking hands).
Quran (24:31) - Women are to lower their gaze around men, so they do not look them in the eye. (To be fair, men are told to do the same thing in the prior verse).
Quran (2:223) - “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will…”
A man has dominion over his wives’ bodies as he does his land. This verse is overtly sexual. There is some dispute as to whether it is referring to the practice of anal intercourse. If this is what Muhammad meant, then it would appear to contradict what he said in Muslim (8:3365).
Quran (4:3) - (Wife-to-husband ratio) “Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four” Inequality by numbers.
Quran (53:27) - “Those who believe not in the Hereafter, name the angels with female names.”
Angels are sublime beings, and would therefore be male.
Quran (4:24) and Quran (33:50) - A man is permitted to take women as sex slaves outside of marriage. Note that the verse distinguishes wives from captives (those whom they right hand possesses).
From Hadith & Sira
with comments.
Sahih Bukhari (6:301) - “[Muhammad] said, ‘Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?’ They replied in the affirmative. He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her intelligence.’”
Sahih Bukhari (6:301) - continued - “[Muhammad said] ‘Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?’ The women replied in the affirmative. He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her religion.’” Allah has made women deficient in the practice of their religion as well, by giving them menstrual cycles.
Sahih Bukhari (2:29) - Women comprise the majority of Hell’s occupants. This is important because the only women in heaven mentioned explicitly by Muhammad are the virgins who serve the sexual desires of men. (A weak Hadith, Kanz al-`ummal, 22:10, even suggests that 99% of women go to Hell).
Sahih Bukhari (62:81) - "The Prophet said: “‘The stipulations most entitled to be abided by are those with which you are given the right to enjoy the (women’s) private parts (i.e. the stipulations of the marriage contract).’” In other words, the most important thing a woman brings to marriage is between her legs.
Sahih Bukhari (62:58) - A woman presents herself in marriage to Muhammad, but he does not find her attractive, so he “donates” her on the spot to another man.
Sahih Muslim (4:1039) - “A’isha said [to Muhammad]: ‘You have made us equal to the dogs and the asses’” These are the words of Muhammad’s favorite wife, complaining of the role assigned to women under Islam.
Abu Dawud (2:704) - “…the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: When one of you prays without a sutrah, a dog, an ass, a pig, a Jew, a Magian, and a woman cut off his prayer, but it will suffice if they pass in front of him at a distance of over a stone’s throw.”
Abu Dawud (2155) - Women are compared to slaves and camels with regard to the “evil” in them.
Ishaq 593 - “As for Ali, he said, ‘Women are plentiful, and you can easily change one for another.’” Ali was raised as a son by Muhammad. He was also the 4th caliph. This comment was made in Muhammad’s presence without a word of rebuke from him.
Ishaq 593 - “From the captives of Hunayn, Allah’s Messenger gave [his son-in-law] Ali a slave girl called Baytab and he gave [future Caliph] Uthman a slave girl called Zaynab and [future Caliph] Umar another.” - Even in this world, Muhammad treated women like party favors, handing out enslaved women to his cronies for sex.
Ibn Ishaq (693) - “Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu’l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons.” Muhammad traded captured women for horses.
Al-Tirmidhi 3272 - “When Allah’s Messenger was asked which woman was best he replied, ‘The one who pleases (her husband) when he looks at her, obeys him when he gives a command, and does not go against his wishes regarding her person or property by doing anything of which he disapproves’.”
Tabari VIII:117 - The fate of more captured farm wives, whom the Muslims distributed amongst themselves as sex slaves: “Dihyah had asked the Messenger for Safiyah when the Prophet chose her for himself… the Apostle traded for Safiyah by giving Dihyah her two cousins. The women of Khaybar were distributed among the Muslims.”
Tabari IX:137 - “Allah granted Rayhana of the Qurayza to Muhammad as booty.”
Ishaq 969 - “Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are prisoners with you having no control of their persons.” - This same text also says that wives may be beaten for “unseemliness”.
Tabari Vol 9, Number 1754 - “Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals with you and do not possess anything for themselves.” From Muhammad’s ‘Farewell Sermon’.
Reality couldn’t care less about your bigotry.
What works is what works (aka “I am that I am”).
Regardless of whatever evil you claim they do, until I see better from you…
Prove my criticisms of the evil acts of SOME Muslims who are influenced by evil laden elements from the Quran [in part] is bigotry.
Note my OP ‘Do not Bash Muslims’ and I am only criticizing the evil laden verses in the Quran and not the whole of Quran. There is no indication of total intolerance [bigotry] in this case.
[After the moderator’s reminder, note I have refrained from stating any thing personally offensive to any one).
If you cannot prove ‘bigotry’ in my case, you are goading others.
Are you saying no one in this world should criticize evil [as defined] wherever they exist because “we are what we are”?
Actually being able to choose running around nude has a lot to do with religion and free to choose. You are fine with your restrictions but, think another ethical/moral religious restriction is bad. You are free to choose nudity and you know there will be repercussions. A 14 year old child knows restrictions and is free to choose to follow or face repercussions. An adult is free to choose or not. Even a slave can .
Reread what I said about 14 yr olds , no gender was mentioned. No sane intelligent parent would turn a 14 yr old boy or girl loose with money and no restrictions. A rare very responsible 14 yr old might be trusted.
A deeply conservative religious intelligent family absolutely would not ever, unless they beat that child into subservience which would mean your 14 yr old would not have even thought of buying a short skirt or even be able to.
Your 14 yr old the way you set it up had freedom to choose:
“If 14-year-old girl is called a whore by her father and brothers because she is wearing a ‘short’ skirt to school … How do you think she will react? Will she be able to stand up to them? Is she going to take the punishments? Is she prepared to die for that principle?”
If that 14 yr old who knew the rules and principals of her family did such a thing then yes she is prepared.
She freely chose. If that 14 year old was beaten down before hand about the inevitable childhood infractions, then she freely chose. No way, no how will an average or above 14 yr old, a 13 yr old not know what they are doing.
So unless you can prove all the women are routinely beaten down into absolute subservience or are bred to be unthinking creatures, the women are free to choose.
James, your star trek autism says that all cultures are equal, even if they are barbaric. Prime directive bullshit. If an impending asteroid will wipe out all life on the planet, star trek autism says it is morally wrong to save their society.
You’re acting like Islam has some kind of goal. It has no goal other than perpetuating itself. Islam teaches males to have no goal other than Islam, so it makes males essentially “How can I help you get us there”, it’s a feminizing religion, and you’re acting like it’s the salvation of masculinity and the salvation of nature or something.
???
What in the Hell do Star Trek themes have to do with ME???
I have never said anything about anyone or any thing being equal. 
The ONLY thing that I have said is that what they do with their own kind works for them. Unlike most of Western feminized societies, they are not decaying, but growing. One of the reasons is that they maintain the polarization of the genders.
If you want to dis them, it would be good if you bother to merely do it in a better way. Christianity was relatively kicking their ass. When they gave up on Christianity, they invited in their own foes.
An infectious tumor grows too, why so supportive.
War mongering is war mongering, not helping.
If you want to defeat Islam, just do it right.
The Quran is not going to be ruling the world.
I could see women supporting this view to avoid having sex with men they didn’t want to have sex with (their husbands). Women used to use menstruation as an excuse not to have sex (going even as far as cutting themselves to fake menstrual bleeding). Victorian women did that too. So, in paternalistic societies, the uclean view can work in women’s favor by giving them another excuse not to have sex.