That is not specific enough, to make the claim. As the claimant you are responsible for the validation. If it is such a simple matter. Then do your google search and pick one and post it. The Headline from the post you did link to, did not describe the incident in th the manner you have, nor was it mentioned in the story or video that followed.
I see your civility hasn’t improved.
I claim no exclusive ownership of the opinion. My argument with you as moderator has everything to do with you not following the rules of the forum. If a moderator does not follow the rules he won’t enforce them either. You continue to respond to all who disagree with you in an intolerant and demeaning manner, and as result the forum you moderate has become much the same.
Not how this works. This thread should focus on identifying the question and the terms of the debate, at which point a debate thread will be created. If you just want a normal argument, continue the discussion that was already started in SG&E.
This doesn’t seem like a very good question for a debate. The first part is whether the kidnapped and abused man was a Trump supporter, which is a question of fact and results in a debate consisting of lists of URLs.
The second part is just complaining about a moderator, which goes better in Meta. Debates are meant to be spectator affairs, and two people bickering about which one is the jerk just sounds boring.
Carleas, I understand, but to continue the discussion in SG&E would simply put myself in a position to be on the butt end of more uncivil responses. That forum is a circus of incivility. I sometimes have to edit myself, because the constant onslaught of demeaning remarks is taxing and my emotions get away from me. Querry? was such a circumstance. I was beginning to act in kind, and deleted my remarks and replaced them with the word querry.
this< doesn’t feel like a community. As I have said before, You are a “square-sort” and I will leave you to your board.
What is SG&E for members of and for the sake of this supposed com-m-unity, pls. Spell it out; even for those whose only intent is to fol-low. Otherwise they may mis-inter-pret a signification of a code.
Now? I haven’t said a single thing in this thread that I didn’t say to you twice before already.
You had your chance to discuss this with me in the actual thread about the subject. You elected to subject the thread to a textual seizure of some sort instead. I have nothing new to say, you haven’t challenged anything I said in any substantial way, there’s nothing to talk about.
Even I, an emotionally crippled, intellectually retarded, flaming idiot got it. And you Ucci, seek to make fun of it.
You win. I am every bit your intellectual inferior. I don’t have the right to add question to anything you claim. I drink from what ever toilet you require.
But damn, I was really moved by that piece Carleas wrote about the community of philosophy. I really bought it. I am a stupid idiot for having bought into such unimplemented rhetoric.
I gotta go now again and recharge my human battery. I really hate myself when I can’t understand. You may paint that picture any way that serves you, and you have. Best of luck to you my personal grind stone. Hone an edge against that wheel too harshly and it has surely cracked.
I’ll be in my hole, attempting to rebuild any self esteem I have had for myself. You really showed me what life is all about. Gratitude. That’s a life lesson that requires a second or third look.
Carelas, In this opinion, there is no where that makes the question of bullying the wrong place. But as you have stated. >this< isn’t it.
Except to those who go by the motto: ‘If some thing doesn’t kill someone, it will make him stronger.’& to them, no place is the wrong place, but then again…
It feeds you. You live on it. Addicted. If you don’t get ‘it’ you are a crab and a rather toxic guy to be around. You are the ringmaster of a circus of incivility.
Any time I can provide you your fix and we can get about with a more civil discourse; I’m your dealer. I’ll peddle you your hearts desire.
I don’t think I’ve said how smart Ucci is. It’s really quite amazing. Everyone must agree.
Interesting question Ucci. I certainly have no record of ever being banned for it, no record for even being issued a warning for it, in your forum or any of the others. That could in part be due to a rather lax tolerance for it in general. Anytime you’d like to issue me a warning, and you’ve had the capacity all along.
Does this post represent the sort of high caliber philosophical discussion you have in mind? I’d view it as spam. We may be in a discussion that I tried to turn it into a debate but you weren’t interested and Carleas stated that’s not how it works. Now we have a member active in your forum spreading it here. It is in your favor, so you are not likely to see it as spam, but, it sure looks like it.
I’ve ‘spanked’ members who have supported my position, if all it looks like is spam.
That is no secret. But that is your response to the discussion at hand? That’s how you make a case? What difference does it make? How is it a valid response and not just more spam?
You get under my skin like crazy. It is really hard not to scratch. But like I’ve said, I’ve never been banned or warned for incivility, and it appears your “position” provides you insulation from that as possibility.