Carleas, I understand, but to continue the discussion in SG&E would simply put myself in a position to be on the butt end of more uncivil responses. That forum is a circus of incivility. I sometimes have to edit myself, because the constant onslaught of demeaning remarks is taxing and my emotions get away from me. Querry? was such a circumstance. I was beginning to act in kind, and deleted my remarks and replaced them with the word querry.
this< doesn’t feel like a community. As I have said before, You are a “square-sort” and I will leave you to your board.
What is SG&E for members of and for the sake of this supposed com-m-unity, pls. Spell it out; even for those whose only intent is to fol-low. Otherwise they may mis-inter-pret a signification of a code.
Now? I haven’t said a single thing in this thread that I didn’t say to you twice before already.
You had your chance to discuss this with me in the actual thread about the subject. You elected to subject the thread to a textual seizure of some sort instead. I have nothing new to say, you haven’t challenged anything I said in any substantial way, there’s nothing to talk about.
Even I, an emotionally crippled, intellectually retarded, flaming idiot got it. And you Ucci, seek to make fun of it.
You win. I am every bit your intellectual inferior. I don’t have the right to add question to anything you claim. I drink from what ever toilet you require.
But damn, I was really moved by that piece Carleas wrote about the community of philosophy. I really bought it. I am a stupid idiot for having bought into such unimplemented rhetoric.
I gotta go now again and recharge my human battery. I really hate myself when I can’t understand. You may paint that picture any way that serves you, and you have. Best of luck to you my personal grind stone. Hone an edge against that wheel too harshly and it has surely cracked.
I’ll be in my hole, attempting to rebuild any self esteem I have had for myself. You really showed me what life is all about. Gratitude. That’s a life lesson that requires a second or third look.
Carelas, In this opinion, there is no where that makes the question of bullying the wrong place. But as you have stated. >this< isn’t it.
Except to those who go by the motto: ‘If some thing doesn’t kill someone, it will make him stronger.’& to them, no place is the wrong place, but then again…
It feeds you. You live on it. Addicted. If you don’t get ‘it’ you are a crab and a rather toxic guy to be around. You are the ringmaster of a circus of incivility.
Any time I can provide you your fix and we can get about with a more civil discourse; I’m your dealer. I’ll peddle you your hearts desire.
I don’t think I’ve said how smart Ucci is. It’s really quite amazing. Everyone must agree.
Interesting question Ucci. I certainly have no record of ever being banned for it, no record for even being issued a warning for it, in your forum or any of the others. That could in part be due to a rather lax tolerance for it in general. Anytime you’d like to issue me a warning, and you’ve had the capacity all along.
Does this post represent the sort of high caliber philosophical discussion you have in mind? I’d view it as spam. We may be in a discussion that I tried to turn it into a debate but you weren’t interested and Carleas stated that’s not how it works. Now we have a member active in your forum spreading it here. It is in your favor, so you are not likely to see it as spam, but, it sure looks like it.
I’ve ‘spanked’ members who have supported my position, if all it looks like is spam.
That is no secret. But that is your response to the discussion at hand? That’s how you make a case? What difference does it make? How is it a valid response and not just more spam?
You get under my skin like crazy. It is really hard not to scratch. But like I’ve said, I’ve never been banned or warned for incivility, and it appears your “position” provides you insulation from that as possibility.
Read your past four or five replies in this thread. What discussion is it that you imagine to be ‘at hand’? I made a point, you declared the discussion over and spammed a bunch of retarded fucking nonsense about how emotionally cripped and idiotic you are. You may recall, this is exactly what I predicted you would do when I was explaining to you why a debate isn’t happening between us. This is, in fact, what you always do when somebody you’re discussing with makes a point.
So yes, that is my response to you because that sort of thing is what you deserve. Feel free to contribute in a meaningful way to any of the dozens of interesting conversations going on on this message board at this very moment, and prove how wrong I am about your function here.
Calm down. You seem to be letting your temper get the better of you. Just like before, you become so intolerable when you reply in such an uncivil manner. You’ve got the symptom nailed straight away, the cause on the other hand continues to elude you. But there you go. When you use that tone, example that ethos.
It is a good example of why you aren’t a very adept moderator.