Trump Supporter

Also an interesting question. Have you, as a moderator, ever issued a warning for incivility to anyone?

Here are the rules PavlovianModel146 issued for the forum prior to you.

And your Rule:

You are the ringmaster, “SG&E people” are posting it almost constantly and you add to it in kind.

We could take a poll: which forum represents the most incivility?

Does this post represent the sort of high caliber philosophical discussion you have in mind? I’d view it as spam. We may be in a discussion that I tried to turn it into a debate but you weren’t interested and Carleas stated that’s not how it works. Now we have a member active in your forum spreading it here. It is in your favor, so you are not likely to see it as spam, but, it sure looks like it.

I’ve ‘spanked’ members who have supported my position, if all it looks like is spam.

Looks like a found a nerve.

That is no secret. But that is your response to the discussion at hand? That’s how you make a case? What difference does it make? How is it a valid response and not just more spam?
You get under my skin like crazy. It is really hard not to scratch. But like I’ve said, I’ve never been banned or warned for incivility, and it appears your “position” provides you insulation from that as possibility.

Carleas, If you feel that moving >this< to “Your” meta forum is the right move. I’d be fine with that. I can continue there just as easily.

Read your past four or five replies in this thread. What discussion is it that you imagine to be ‘at hand’? I made a point, you declared the discussion over and spammed a bunch of retarded fucking nonsense about how emotionally cripped and idiotic you are. You may recall, this is exactly what I predicted you would do when I was explaining to you why a debate isn’t happening between us. This is, in fact, what you always do when somebody you’re discussing with makes a point.

So yes, that is my response to you because that sort of thing is what you deserve. Feel free to contribute in a meaningful way to any of the dozens of interesting conversations going on on this message board at this very moment, and prove how wrong I am about your function here.

Calm down. You seem to be letting your temper get the better of you. Just like before, you become so intolerable when you reply in such an uncivil manner. You’ve got the symptom nailed straight away, the cause on the other hand continues to elude you. But there you go. When you use that tone, example that ethos.

It is a good example of why you aren’t a very adept moderator.

Are you getting hungry Ucci? Will someone get “Marilyn” here, a snickers.

Pav’s #6 is quite ironic. #1, 2 and 3, you’ve blown the doors off of.

Perhaps you could share a little more regarding what

That might be insightful.

I am. You may disagree with what I consider meaningful but that would be an additional question to the one about how uncivil a moderator on this forum can be, not a replacement or distraction to that question.

I am not a moderator, that is your function here. I didn’t have a function here but I’ve been kicked around by you long enough.

My ‘function’ here is to get it to stop.

viewtopic.php?f=15&t=185564

Dammit.

These two quotes come from the same post. Were we having a discussion or weren’t we?

I am likely less confused then you appear.

Fake news is the rage.

You couldn’t handle an actual philosophical debate with me. If Uccisore can beat you so easily you wouldn’t make it with me. You’re not even in the same league as me buddy. I do enjoy your liberal (Marxist) tears however, it’s so delicious…

A man that cannot or refuses to debate has already conceded to defeat.

Mainstream controlled news talking point. Wow, you’re such a fucking intellectual… :laughing:

How can anybody here compete with this astonishing intellectual mind of his? :laughing:

More of the same old same old Joker?

Merlin, Who are you? And have you in any of your previous incarnations been banned? What sock puppet are you currently operating under?

You would like to disparage socialism and generalize it as Marxist? You can’t take a shit without a hundred thousand people being involved. You don’t take a drink from tap water without society and socialism being in play. You can’t even take an honest look at yourself. Can you start a fire with only your knowledge to rely upon? Do you grow your own food? If this shit and a hand basket were to go up in smoke, you’d be up a creek without a paddle. Or tell me you are a master of self survival.

Shit, you didn’t even give me a chance to clean the gun.

Who are you? Are you Merlin, Joker ??? Wtf fellow planeteer? Who are you?

Ucci stated my post history is available for all to see. What about your history? You wanna play games? Dictate the rules. I have no flipping idea how smart I am. You want to play a ‘game’?

So here is my proposition. We have a discussion, a conversation, just you and me. I don’t want to debate you. I want to learn from you if you’ve got anything I can learn from. You may ask any questions of me as long as I can ask any questions of you; I agree to answer them truthfully and honestly if you can agree to do the same.

Come on, Joker, shall we dance by the pale blue light of the moon? (sorry that was a bit melodramatic, but it bought me a smile just the same. I admit I can use all I can find.) And you seek to make fun of it? Let’s you and I “dance”, shall we?.

Question? Are you courageous enough to dance with an idiot? Like I said I don’t know you. Let’s dance.

Another question, given your view, are you courageous enough to dance with who you feel is an idiot.

Question being, are you a humanist enough that you would be seen dancing with someone you think is an idiot?

If you think you could best Ucci and you think Ucci bested me. You’ve got some thinking coming your way. Don’t worry though, you think I am an idiot.

Can you dance? I’m not looking for someone to just stand there, posing.

I clearly made the right choice.

Trump has been the president and CEO and ruler of his own autonomous country in the guise of a worldwide business empire. It was a step down for him to take the role of president of the US, a reduction of power and he has far more applicable experience for the position than Hilary. Try to deny these facts.

Well, yes. It can be countered, Random, by illusion of power motive in his case. He is under the rhetoric a Wisard, of the type found only if we follow the yellow brick road carefully. He is hidden, the taxes, his bancropties pointing to reliance on tagging his brand, suppositions of branding as opposed to owning the equity underneath, conflicting statement emissions fluctuating tweet by tweet, sleeping with presumptive bad fellows, centering rather then liquiditating his center, drawing power from ill informed constituency, grabbing vaginas and other ass-ets, calling reactionary revisionist tunes, the old school of memory laden but irretrievable top 40 thecure all of make America Great Again.

Let’s face it, America had its heyday in the first half of the 20th century, where run away gross Capitalism went unchallenged , met its Communit ideological challenge and won-seeing that as proof of it’s superiority.

But what really happened was the gains of the first half, as immense as they were, gradually eroded, and the idea of the dire Capitalism-Colonialism as the villifying power motive left after the diminution of the other two parts of the scepter-Fascism and Communism- left an ideological vacuum.

Now who best fill the enormous vacuum? Or rather What ideology?

That is the question, and Trump is only an emergency fill, rhetoric to end all rhetorics, based on a gross illusion only a Wizard can conjure.

It takes a Trump to make believe that this really is not the long way around, not the direct way to navigate into the heart of the cataclysmic darkness which is the NWO, all roads leading to ROME, the eternal city, where really it is conceivable that the sUoreme Pontiff, come push to shove, will remain as the only credible center.

The initial stage of this dissection between the new reich’s Angela and the Donald, can already be seen in an obvious handwriting on the wall, where Angela declares that if the US isolationism looses some Asian Markets, well, EU certainly will not hesitate to take advantage of a missed opportunity, and take up the slack. She’d be a fool not to, after all, much is at stake here, so much, that it dwarves prior superpower affairs.

If this line of reasoning is carried to its limit, then it becomes obvious that the new ideology is based on a hope of required hopes, engendered and simulated in a post modern yet absurd hocus pocus.