But, seriously, if there is a distinction, not only between the soul and the body, the soul or ethereal body from the one we see, and finally a simulated difference not only between the hard and the soft drive within these distinctions, but, the difference between the cosmic and mechanical drives , then, as much as I would want to validate these, and want to believe them, something tells me there is something tenuous in this attempt.
My gut level tells me This may be the case, and sorrily am using a method of inter-forum communication re: a previous thread, and although I see little wrong with such a method, in spite of You
bringing it up, wouldn’t such distinctions be as artificially invented conceptual tools as the ‘mind’ it’s self?
In my mind, there may be as many minds as the totality of this present evolutionary epic points to, maybe possessing correspondences within and without others, but if so, wouldn’t these correspondences point toward , not away to such conceptual ideas as wormholes, larger channels of inter-galactical communication, that eventually posit some kind of vestibule, where the All subsist?
Or more likely a wholeness of containment contemporaneous with an eternal diversion, always in circulation, as the blood constantly flowing, the brain waves eternally also, giving rise to the possibility of the One Whole thing?
Finality, that distinction may also be overcome in an eternal return of One over the other.