Void
True, there are same borderline cases where it’s difficult to determine if something truly is degenerate or not, and then another cases which we already mentioned when the degenerate thing is so irrelevant it wouldn’t be worth it to pursue its destruction. I’m not perfect myself, but unlike many others I know at least I recognize some of my shortcomings and seek to correct them when I can.
However, sometimes degeneracy is very easy to spot.
INTO THE OVENS WITH ALL OF THEM
Yeah, and I anticipated the typical classical liberal/libertarian response of “freedom of speech until it causes harm/death to others”, or “until it incites violence against actual person/s”. The thing is, just because some claim doesn’t cause immediate harm, like lying about electricity and then immediately after dropping an electric device into the pool, doesn’t mean it isn’t harmful and doesn’t cause death in future, or prevent birth. Saying that the sexes are equal is such a claim which has destructive consequences when adopted and practiced in reality (destroying sexual dynamics between the sexes → diminishing possibility of healthy relationship → destroying the family unit, which is the basis of society → lower quality/quantity of children, birthrates below sustenance rates (<2.0) → death of society) and it is also an obviously false claim so there truly is no reason at all to permit its expression.
Basically my goal would be to create a society which has built in measures against self-destruction in future, this means some pretty strict principles have to be imposed on the population. I am fine with that, it’s not perfect but it’s better than pretending to value freedom only to then let yourself be infiltrated by all sorts of filth who justify themselves by appealing to the “freedom” of expression and action you give them. While I’m aware of the downsides of an “authoritarian, draconian” society, if it is set up the Reich way I am willing to accept that lack of freedom and a no mercy policy towards opposition as a price to be paid for having a healthy, strong, functioning society.
Again I don’t think you quite understand what I mean by competition. In order to exist society necessarily must limit internal competition, it must impose order violently, and people are then allowed to compete within the restrictions determined by the system. Competition is good, yes, but it’s not good when it’s taken to the extreme and applied out of context (inappropriately), just like cooperation. Anyway, it’s also worth mentioning that cooperation exists only within the larger scale of competition - entities cooperate in order to compete more successfully.
If you don’t fight against it actively degeneracy grows and spreads simply because it is easier, as I said, path of least resistance, and thus most people will choose it over non-degeneracy/health if the environment is right (if they are given the choice to do so without bearing the full consequences of their behavior). The rest of us, who value functionality, strength, and nobility, are a minority. I would say that for this reason it is our task and duty to impose our will upon the masses. Not purely for their sake, but for our sake too - to avoid the constant contamination degeneracy brings with it.
It did work. Third Reich worked. Fascist Italy worked. Ceteris paribus these were the most powerful countries at the time.
It took the entire world to defeat them and Japan and even then the allies suffered more than twice the military casualties even though they won the war:
That is precisely why all European, more precisely, WHITE nationalist movements are now shunned by Jews, while other races can take pride in their own and Jews’ Zionism is deemed good. They saw the power of the white man. They know what we can do and how functional and powerful we can become with an authoritarian, nationalist movement that cuts degeneracy in its roots, and they are doing their all in terms of brainwashing and propaganda to stop us from doing it once again.
The greatest problem is this part:
This is why I’m saying that the system needs to have in built unchangeable principles, to prevent this sort of stuff from happening.
USA and Europe as they are, are going to shit. I already gave some examples of fit societies which shun degeneracy - Third Reich, Fascist Italy. Maybe they weren’t perfect, but they were a decent enough example.
Degeneracy can be fought, it’s not that hard to do it physically, the most difficult part is overcoming memetic indoctrination which you are still obviously struggling with.
That is only a problem if you have no ultimate baseline, aka a guiding principle.
My guiding principle is the modified version of the 14 words - existence of our people and a future for white children - high quantity and quality of white people. This is not up to interpretation. The number of people, or how strong and intelligent they are, isn’t up to interpretation at all. Another quality which I value, beauty, might be said to be up to interpretation to an extent, but in the end we all know which one of these is beautiful, and which isn’t, regardless of how much we pretend it’s all mysterious. Even if it is subjective, apparently almost all of us, like 99% (all of us who are healthy is another way of putting it) instinctively know what is beautiful, and what isn’t, so let’s not bullshit each other:
Your appeals to moderacy, carefulness, skepticism, etc. are nice and all, but you don’t understand what kind of extreme sickness and degeneracy we are dealing with atm. You cannot argue with it reasonably, and pretending as if such filth is on our level is, in my mind, equivalent to conceding defeat and means you’ve already lost. I mean, these people will, with a straight face, tell you such extreme and obvious bullshit as “all races and sexes are equal and should be treated equally”.
How about this (idea loosely based on awesome political spectrum I read about in Daily Stormer which I can’t find anymore):
Extreme leftist position: Equality between kikes, whites, and niggers and sandniggers
Moderate left: Kikes expelled from white countries, niggers and sandniggers made into slaves, whites the superior master race
The most moderate of moderates (centrist): Race war now, gas the kikes
Moderate right: Persecute every living nigger, sand nigger and kike, and torture them before killing them
Extreme right: Persecute every living nigger, sand nigger and kike torture them before killing them, then build cloning factories, clone niggers, sand niggers and Jews only to torture and kill them all over again until the end of times
I mean, if that’s how the Overton Window was framed, sure I would be a moderate centrist, fuck I’d even be willing to compromise and settle for the moderate left position and I’d agree that both of the extremes are a bit excessive.