Today it’s mostly about politics, word games, and semantics. The liberal-left want to control the dialogue regarding race. As I mentioned a few times already, it is in the best interest of the “racist” to accuse others of racism, blaming others, throwing guilt around, while he or herself enjoys the benefits and rewards of “being a racist”. In terms of the “racial realist”, racism merely means preferring your own kin(d) before others. By definition, preferring your own kind would make you a conservative-rightest in the modern world. Liberal-leftists don’t want segregation, people forming their own socially and culturally exclusive groups, especially built on race. This is why liberal-leftists purposefully injected black children into white schools in the Southern States. Their intentions may or may not have been pure or honest.
The premise of liberal-leftism is Blank Slate Theory, that “all humans are created equal” and “with the right education” then “anybody can become anything”. This sounds good, doesn’t it? It sounds noble. And it sounds like anti-victimization. Nobody has anybody else to blame, except themselves, for failure. However, unfortunately, the average liberal-leftist contradicts his and her own political premise. Liberalism has fallen into the trap of Victimhood, and “who is the biggest victim” of society. Today, in the 2010s, the logic goes that whomever is the biggest victim is also most deserving of social praise, reinforcement, popularity, and political backing. Much of this comes from the hatred of white patriarchy, european identity, and “anti-nazism”. Neo-liberals are “nazi-hunters”, obsessed with fascism, dictatorship, and authoritarianism.
The psychological premise for modern leftism and neo-liberalism is a “daddy-complex” quite simply, a severe lack of childhood discipline, a weak or absent father figure. This neo-liberalism and modern leftism, put together, create this vile and depraved sense of “racism”. If you’re a “racist” then you’re eviiiiiiiiiiil. You’re scum. You’re the rot of society.
This causes severe sociosomatic affects throughout society and culture, because it is inherently a contradiction. How can an individual be “eviiiiiil” for preferring his or her own kind, his or her own children? Are there degrees of “racism”, or is it absolute? The “race realists” claim there are degrees of racism. The average liberal-leftist, the neo-liberal, uses it as an absolute distinction. You are racist, therefore evil, therefore there shall be no dialogue or honesty from the onset. No discussion.
It’s shameful, really, and appeals to the most simple-minded throughout society.
There will be no “cure for racism” or “helping humanity”, like mentioned in the thread, at the very least, until YOU can provide solid definitions and frameworks for what is meant by race and “racism”. Race-realism is a middle-ground. Because racial differences are too obvious to defy common sense. Everybody recognizes black and white skin on the visceral level. The neo-liberal answer is to race-mix and miscegenate until the world is one color. Impractical, and defiant of nature. An artifice, an abstract and unrealistic ideology. Perhaps somewhat feasible in the new world, with severe indoctrination, but not in the old world, where tradition and conservative values reign supreme.
In the old world, Europa, Arabia, China, India, there is no breeding outside your line. If you commit “racial crimes” and aggression, marrying a ‘lower’ race, then you are excluded from the center of society and culture. Marrying ‘up’ in race is somewhat acceptable.
Excuse me…that’s enough “racism” for one day?