Congress wants war, war is good business.
Sorry for the mistakes but I am writing on a lesser quality Samsung phone, and will try to correct these.
Your comments pertain to my initial writing.
You need to get a decent voice record to written form app. to forego your atrocious typing mishaps. 
I got you , later .
Later alligator.
There are no more peaceful methods against the status quo, hopefully people in mass will start realizing this someday.
“People in mass” don’t realize anything until the mass-programming dictates it to be so.
…Or until they’re figure out the jack boot that is stomping them on their collective throats…
Why can’t other’s attempt to defer their programming with a different war of words and images, barrage them with something contrary? A non-violent revolution by mimicking the enemies tactics with a better, healthier message? I realize that the illusion most are in runs ever so deep, but why not divert that depth they are drowning in to a wading pool where they can get a stable footing, rise, and begin to survey their landscape, the real landscape, with some breathing room?
How much effective communication do you have with them?
That’s “why”.
If you are referring to them as the lost, then I have had exchanges and they are able to process my views in bite-sized portions, but once we go our own ways, they sink back into the insanity and lies again, are once again, overcome. I suggest we stem the tide from reaching their shores and dragging them in the corrupt riptide again.
Are you suggesting giving up on 75% of the adult population, writing them off as a lost, unreachable cause? 
JSS?
What I would suggest is to learn how to have a durable impact upon their perception of hopes and threats, preferably in a positive direction. Communication is influence. When there is no communication, there is no influence. But communication is a competition. Everyone competes to have the most influence in the direction that they individually favor. A durable communication will alter the ability of future interference. I would suggest to cast a spell of hope toward diverting their communication toward more hopeful endeavors, one of which would be to maintain that diversion.
People do what they do because they are being dominated by too much chaos and extortion. Their Perception of Hopes and Threats are being scrambled and manipulated. If you want to help, you have to work against such obfuscation and coercion. How do you do that, you ask …
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony … especially in your communicating. Such is the essence and key of positive influence.
Would Truth cause entropy? Or would the lack of Truth cause entropy in our closed system?
I don’t know what you mean by “would truth cause…”. Truth is a language describing reality. Would knowing the truth cause entropy? That would depend upon which parts you knew and your situation. You can’t know all of it.
How can you not know all of it? Wouldn’t eternity give you the “time” to know it all? What if all sentient life knew all Truth, would there be enough reason to continue living indefinitely or would all efforts be directed towards escaping eternity?
WendyDarling
Unfortunately I know very little about the US, mainly because I am not from the US. I will be moving there next year so maybe I will learn something about the US.
I do however understand quite a bit about communication, so I have subscribed to this thread and hope to offer some significant input.
Well my communication skills are rough around the edges, but if you have suggestions for my refinement, I’m all eyes. 
WendyDarling
I think “we” are constantly refining each other; by “we”, I mean everyone we come into contact with, on, and hopefully, off, the forum.
When we encounter something that sounds terrible we experience what I call rational mismatch - anyhow. I will be thinking about this . . .
Not really significant input to the thread but very worthwhile considering:
From James’ signature:
Devil’s Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise… until it is too late to choose otherwise.
From My two cents in Gloominary’s thread - Modern Technology:
I worked out a long time ago that to beat your adversary you have to know your adversary . . .
. . . and be able to think like your adversary when or if the need arises.
From what James posted earlier in this thread and a few of my thoughts thrown in:
To do this you have to know the people that you want to impact. Usually this starts out by listening to them - difficult when they are talking rubbish I know but nonetheless people like to be listened to. By getting them onside you are then able to exercise influence.
Exactly. People are lost sheep as you know and common sense is dead. However while one person is able to exercise good judgement then we still have hope.
So true. I would also say that people need to know that you care. Not so easy to share the warmth these days, but do not lose hope - you have to stand by what you believe in, unless you know that something better has come along. Just the same:
Never give up!
How do you show the care for a population as opposed to the more intimate care shown to one person?
Why does this concept blow my mind? Is it so far removed from my mode of operation that even the thought of it overwhelms me? Or is it more that I’m not ready to apply myself…in strategy games against computer generated opponents? I know that their mode of operation is primarily, efficiency, but I rebel against their mode of operation and try to defeat them on my own terms only to get smacked down, with every tactic I try. Yes, sacrifice was not programmed into those opponents, so there is a bit of a leg up, but it always boils down to the damn efficiency of my maneuvers.