Why there is belief in an afterlife

“What are man’s truths ultimately? Merely his irrefutable errors.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science

I do not think that this man is taking the positive position or the negative position. The only position that I see he is taking is the one where he cannot know and that he doesn’t even care about. He is taking the more skeptical/agnostic position.

Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies.
Nietzsche.

Any positive position I hold to be true will be supported by evidence
Any negative position I hold to be true will be supported by lack of evidence for the positive position

For example astral projection : no evidence for it so I take the negative position as the default position

You think this is wrong because you claim to have astrally projected and also because you want it to be true
Unfortunately neither of these constitute evidence so I still maintain the negative position as the default one

You have also suggested that consciousness after brain death is evidence of it surviving after brain function ceases
But I suggest that science does not yet have an explanation for this and that one has to be patient until it finds one

Your positions are undermined by specifically wanting something to be true regardless of what evidence says or even if there is any
Whereas I am much more interested in having positions based upon evidence or no evidence rather than simply what I want to true

I gave you the anecdotal evidence based on medical case studies of establishing typical statistical references of near death experiences, but your liberal mind (a mind detached from reality) refuses to accept that as any form of evidence.

Do you not remember me saying that in science there is no such thing as anecdotal evidence
Do you not remember me saying personal testimony that cannot be verified is not evidence

If Wiki lies, tell me. If not stop with your denial of the reality that is before your eyes in the above quote.

That definition is a bit loose especially the second part so it needs tightening up

Evidence for astral projection most definitely does not exist because it is purely anecdotal
Evidence for consciousness surviving brain death does exist but the reason is not yet known

The studies tie surviving death and what happened during together. Remember the brain’s are not supposed to be functioning after a certain amount of time but they do and the people have similar stories of what went on in their minds, which is more than just your brain.

I would like to learn more about this as I think it is a very fascinating subject indeed
But in the meantime I shall still use the definition of mind as a function of the brain
I know you will disagree but as we no longer agree on any thing it is no real surprise

Spiritualism is the belief that the spirits of the dead have both the ability and the inclination to communicate with the living. The afterlife, or the “spirit world”, is seen by spiritualists, not as a static place, but as one in which spirits continue to evolve.

After some research I am of the opinion that what you are speaking about, is the practice of Spiritual Formation, which is a system of practices that were originally invented by Ignatius Loyola the founder of the Jesuits.

One key element of spiritual formation is called “contemplative spirituality.” Other related terms include “contemplative prayer,” or “centering prayer.” These are all names for essentially the same thing. This is nothing more than a mixture of what New Age pagan practitioners of meditation and Roman Catholic monks have taught for centuries.

Here is what Thomas Keating, a Roman Catholic monk, has this to say about contemplative prayer, otherwise known as centering prayer:

Spiritual disciplines, both East and West, are based on the hy- pothesis that there is something that we can do to enter upon the journey to divine union once we have been touched by the realization that such a state exists. Centering prayer is a disci- pline designed to reduce obstacles… choose a sacred word [to repeat]… Twenty to thirty minutes is the minimum amount of time necessary for most people to establish interior silence.12

In other words, you repeat religious or Biblical words (it doesn’t really matter which ones) in order to “center” your thoughts until you feel like you have unity with God.

Jesus specifically mentioned repetition as vain and useless. He said “but when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking” (Matthew 6:7).

Contemplative prayer is mystical from its core, so it is fruitless from my point of view to persuade you otherwise.

With regard to your questions above. Read the Scriptures the answers are all there. :wink:

Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many enter through it.
Matthew 7:13

SM,
It’s rather annoying that you beckon emphatically to have your questions answered but you do not return the courteousness, are you sure that you are not an American liberal leftist? Well if you ever decide to become a forthright Christian, let me know, where questions and their answers are exchanged rather than one-directional.

I answered your questions.

It is all there in the Scriptures.

I believe that you need to check everything out for yourself. Don’t just believe what someone else tells you. If it is something from the Bible go look it up for yourself.

You did not answer my questions based on your beliefs, what scriptures? Go reread what I asked from you.

(Liberals get their dishonesty and their disingenuous ways from Christians I believe.)

Wendy wrote:

Of course you do.

If you paid one wit of attention, you’d know that your sarcastic remark is not accurate and your behavior is not honest.

In Europe and America, a big change came with the “Death of God”.
Fear of Dantes hell subsided, and people were no longer able to care as much about doing the right, vs the wrong thing.
But the idea of an afterlife that rewards stayed attractive to them.
So hell was abandoned, and people began investing heaven, make it more interesting, attractive.
Then, when heaven was made into a modern type paradise (I live on, my soul lives on) people started to imagine the things they would have to do to get there - – oh, lo! It turned out to be exactly those things that they were ready doing.

This transformed the afterlife form a stimulus to discipline oneself to a certain standard (in ancient days, heroism, in Christian days, meekness) to something that is just there to take away the annoying thought that ones ego will at one point wither and die, and allows the ego to imagine itself important, the source of all things (the spark of god) and capable of transcending death by lucid dreaming. Its only effect is radically increasing the human capacity for egoism and bigotry.

Back to the original notion of the afterlife, the fruit of ones actions in the world. Here is a very good short paper on the subject:
ocw.mit.edu/courses/history/21h … rev_dn.pdf

I do believe that this is the only afterlife that a sane human would be considering.

In case someone woud crave being able to look toward a personal afterlife, where the ego gets to continue its little games, where the experience of the self can continue without all the Earthly conditions that made it, it will always resemble a teenage girls bedroom - colourful, emotional, empty of ideas of responsibility - an instrument to self-pleasing.

In as far as the continuation of the fruits of our actions pertains to us personally, we have the notion of karma.
Throughout all cultures that influenced the west, it has been the planet Saturn that has been attributed the function of karmic receptor and distributor.

Saturn, the horned one, the dweller on the threshold, the judge of what lives on and what must be ground back to nothingness - this planet was given the name of The Devil.

In the 20th century there was a German mystic who went very far in exploring this concept called Rudolph Steiner.
I am just posting this as an interesting facet of the pervasive belief in life after death.

Ideologies of reward without sacrifice are of course ignoble.
Saturn is the planet associated with death, harvest, natural cycles, hardship, bare bones necessity, learning from experience.
We can easily associate it with karma.

Jupiter is the planet associated with ideology, fanaticism, luck, self-exaggeration, prophecy and priesthood.
We can associate it with al the other ideas about afterlife. Both the warlike forward striving sacrificial will of heroes and the dreamlike imagination of the new age explorer.

Karma is a legislative idea, it commands an awareness of the consequences of ones action on the greater world.
Regardless of its physical truthfulness, it is a powerful idea that can hone the half beast that any human is born as into a cultivated entity.

I just found a video locked on my account that I never published but which is really good, comparatively, compared to my videos in general.
I post it here and not in The Philosophers because half way I actually explain the idea much more lucidly than I do in the OP.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXxgGVxMu3A[/youtube]