Charlottesville Virginia Clash.

To some extent I agree with you.
Imagine the hippies, did they run around as their public image wearing hammer and sickle?
Not so much but what they didn’t do is accuse their opposition of being communists.
That would have destroyed them.
But it’s also more difficult for the right wing today because the media is ferociously and unfairly anti-right and anti-white and there will always be some individual or small group that they can find and take a picture of wearing the wrong iconography, often as a fuck you to the hateful establishment.

But it is also true that the number of those “democrats” who can afford to live in those “gated communities” is shrinking and the number of the others is increasing.

Unfortunately, conservatives are more and more suspected to be nationalists, national socialists (fascists), racists, although everyone could know that that is not the truth about conservatives. It is extremely cynical to lump conservatives and extreme right-wingers together. Doing this has another reason, because it is the goal of the globalists to destroy all genealogy, origin, inheritance, traditions, national history etc… The fight can be called “globalism versus nationalism”. So the globalists have to lump conservatives and extreme right-wingers together; otherwise they would never achieve their goal.

[tab][/tab]
Globalists belong to the terrible people of modernity and are the most powerful terrorists of the present.

The number of democrats living in their money gated predominantly White communities is shrinking, true, but so is the number of White Democrat voters in general. Btw, this was me playing the “The Democrats are the real racists” fool. A fool because yes that’s true, they are more racist but being less racist than them will not help you.

Conservatives today are not fascists and not very racist, less racist than the left, by far (before they changed the definition for themselves that you can’t be racist towards White people). The point is, if they want to protect anything they have and not lose their life then they will have to become more fascist, more racist, more like their forebears, more like those kind of White people who built a civilisation and not those kind of White people who let themselves get kowtowed by mentally ill, destructive people.

That is true.

Conservatives are less racist than all other political groups. But conservatives are the ENEMY of the current globalistic system we have. As I said before: the globalistic goal is to destroy ALL nations and everything that has to do with nations, nationalism, national history, traditions, origin, genealogy, biological and economical heritage, inheritance … and so on; so globalists have to lump conservatives and extreme right-wingers together in order to achieve the globalistic goal.

[tab]Note (for the US citizens, Canadians, Australians, partly also the UK citizens and the Irsih people): The word “conservative” does not so much refer to the meaning that it has in your countries, because it refers to the meaning that it has in Europe, especially in continental Europe.[/tab]

They won’t achieve it anyway and their being bitch slapped by that reality is coming.

Is_Yde_opN

Did you catch my video contribution on page one, The Patriot Nurse?

Yes I did and she is someone I would definitely like to hear more from

She does really great medical do it yourself/how-to vids as well.

Agreed.

Sometimes the US media takes its directives from Europe, but mostly it is the other way around.

She is a black and a female senator.
That makes two privilege points: youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&t=231s .

Actually, you forgot that being a senator adds another huge privilege point.

Agreed on both counts Arminius and Wendy.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxjWYUybnc8[/youtube]

Thanks for the introduction to One America News. I’ll have to check them out further. Real news would be shocking at this point. :open_mouth:

All of Richard Spencer’s websites and forums have been shut down. At this rate only 4chan will be left as a censorship free medium of internet communication whose server I’ve heard is in Japan somewhere. We’re reaching peak lunacy very quickly.

The more you censor any kind of social movement the more you legitimize it, joke is on you all.

She has a healthy attitude.

Open letter to the governor.

All governors are controlled at the state level, it is a waste of time trying to reason with them.

Okay.

Of course my own rendition of that revolves around the extent to which any particular individual out in any particular world [rooted existentially in an extant historical, cultural and experiential context] is able to make a substantive distinction between what he believes is true about human interactions “in his head” “here and now” and what he is able to demonstrate that all reasonable men and women are obligated to believe in turn. Why? Because something can in fact be shown to be true objectively for all of us.

In this case, pertaining to the “Charlottesville Virginia Clash”

In other words, different folks embracing different political prejudices [derived from different philosophical assumptions] come to this thread and argue for one or another political narrative that is said to best explain “what happened” there. Either as the optimal frame of mind or as the only rational manner in which to construe it.

My argument though is that these conflicting political prejudices/narratives [on threads like this] are rooted more in the manner in which I have come to construe these “human all too human” interactions as the embodiment of dasein, conflicting goods and political economy.

The part that most objectivists avoid like the plague. Why? Because [in my view] they have too much invested psychologically in this:

1] there is a “real me” that transcends contingency, chance and change
2] this “real me” is in sync with one or another understanding of “virtue” or “truth” or “justice”
3] “virtue”, “truth”, “justice” embedded in one or another rendition of God, Humanism, ideology, nature

In fact, some will insist that any attempt on my part to tug the thread in this direction is merely an attempt to “derail” it.

I suspect instead however that a part of them recognizes that to go in this direction is to risk being yanked down into the fucking dilemma that plagues me.

But: I go there precisely because it is the only manner in which I might come across a frame of mind that yanks me up out of it!