Let us also not forget, Meno, that spelled backwards L I V E becomes E V I L.
I often muse on that.
Anyway, dogs can be quite faithful though I am an agnostic and a skeptic.
~~ and ~~
There are many, who by their moral perception, believe that living truly can be evil.
That is an aphorism? I thought that they were short and to the point.
It’s interesting.to ponder about whether the degree of relevance between reverse spelling and the ideas represented above have any signification. Given the idea that it is not a question of if there is such signifier or connection, but the degree of it, one stops to wonder.
If as You bring up the significance of dogs being man’s best friend, then the hidden dimensions may become more revealing
This all makes ‘sense’ only if we.somehow adhere to the idea that there are.no absolutely exclusive events in
existence,.because everything is related, however remotely
The search for an evolutionary missing link is an example of keeping this quest going.
But is that a proof or evidence that life makes no sense (to you)?
On one level, it does make sense, on another it is a sensless, hidden ,pathetic idea. But they do connect on yet another , instinctual level.
I think that life is what the whole is in a sense of immediacy. It must be integrated into a Mediation. Perhaps by Music, which sets categorial perception on controlled Change. In this way a certain Musical way/direction mirrors social Relations. And this does mediate life.
How would You determine that life makes no sense to someone? What would You take to be proof or evidence ~~ aside from one’s words to that effect?
Ravel’s Bolera comes to mind here. There was a time when I found it to be a bit boring and tedious until I really listened deeply to it. It reminds me of such controlled Change.More of a meditation than a mediation. But I am not sure what is meant by mediation in his instance.
Is that you, Arminius? 
No.
I am this of course:
[tab]Greetings from Spain:
[/tab]
…I just knew he had dark blue eyes… :-"
…that is not how I pictured you look at all, Arminius.
…you been taking advantage of the clubbing facilities? I hope so… 
A good one.
=D>
(The similarities are purely coincidental, by the way.)
Why? I mean how did you picture my look then?
Yes. But being like “SAM”, San Jaime (Saint James 
) is for all guests here in this area.
[tab]Greetings from Spain:
[/tab]
Meditation is well. Another aspect: Nietzsches favours the Artist even with philosophical questions. In art some Relations are wrapped, and we may ask what does this mean for science. Perhaps an outer perspective on science, e.g. questions like that for truth, couldn’t be established, but are thematised in art. As a consequence some other questions like that for life couldn’t be streamlined.
What does this mean for science?
What does this entire post mean???
Are you doing a Google translate from another language? Cause it ain’t working. 
I just want to say, that art answers question which science doesn’t. We do not know what is truth in science, but we know what truth is in art. Perhaps, if the relation between art and science is enlightened science can Profit from it.
Really?
One could say that truth is unknown in both science and art because we do not have access to ‘absolute truth’.
One could say that truth is known both in science and art because all truth is subjective.
But how can one say that it is unknown in science and known in art unless one uses different definitions of truth for science and art?
With Vico man could understand what he himself produces. In art the range of this is wider than in science. So truth in art is deeper than in science. With a philosophy of technique like that of Gotthard Günther things are different. But transclassic logic must be applied to science, to get Vicos Claim even in science.
But truth is not always deeper in art than in science.
[tab]Greetings from Spain:
Monument in memory of Pelagius (c. 685 – 737) at Covadonga, site of his famous victory:
Pelagius (Spanish: Pelayo, Asturian: Pelayu; c. 685 – 737) was a Visigothic nobleman who founded the Kingdom of Asturias, ruling it from 718 until his death. Through his victory at the Battle of Covadonga, he is credited with beginning the Reconquista, the Christian reconquest of the Iberian peninsula from the Moors. He established an independent Christian state (the independent Christian Kingdom of Asturias) in opposition to Moorish hegemony.[/tab]
Naturally, life makes no sense, because it has no natural goal. Or has it? Culturally, life makes sense, because it has a cultural goal - due to its soul.
[/tab]