Rahner favours the Idea of Heidegger, that there is - like in Sartre - a fundamental way of existence apart from science. This is to him the same as being aligned with god. The idea that we must have a total scientific knowledge to found our existence does mean hell. Is this a correct way to see things?
Nobody has “total knowledge” of science. Most people have very little knowledge of it. (school science that is.)
But one could say that people have a lot of common science knowledge … friction, fluid mechanics, the motion of objects, effects of heat … stuff you learn by bouncing a ball, playing with buckets of water, cooking, etc.
Is there a hard separation between science and non-science?
i agree. being a genius it makes it hard to emotionally connect with people. though it was already hard for me to emotionally connect with people to begin with.
There is such a way of existence apart from science, yes, of course.
The fundamental way of existence apart from science is needed. Science should have a non-sciencific opponent. Also, science has become too corrupt just because of many reasons, and one of this many reasons has been the lack of a fundamental way of existence apart from science.