You misunderstood what I wrote, so I will expand on it for you:
-
All sorts of relationships are restricted for the good of society and individuals within the society. Restricting relationships is not in itself immoral.
-
Calling something immoral does not make it immoral. You have to provide reasons why it is immoral.
-
Morality is a set of trade-offs. Every person does not get everything that he/she wants.
You should edit your post because it looks like I wrote the stuff that you actually wrote. Very confusing. But here goes:
Do you have a reference for that statistic or should I take it on faith?
It doesn’t support your arguments in any case. If divorce is allowed, then the divorced mother may remarry another abusive man. The divorced father is free to remarry and abuse another child. Therefore, divorce is not a solution to abuse since the abusers are still “out there”.
The only solution is to jail/punish the abusers.
“People change”. Is that a valid argument in contract law? “I changed my mind so the contract no longer applies.”
I bet it doesn’t work.
Abuse again? Already covered.
Abuse again?
Society isn’t forcing misery onto people. There are plenty of ways to find happiness besides a romantic relationship with a spouse.
Abuse again? Jail the abuser.