Fair.I’m not even going to try to defend the above,it was very late and try to pull things together,
. albeit unsuccesively.
The merit of my argument , nevertheless, as tenuous, has redeemable featured.
Contradiction on the naive logical level, contrasts with the later, more expanding scientifically based level. Here, ordering of sets , based on types- qualities, expressed through adverbs, rather then verbs, ( where verbs are prone to express the duality of exisyence.
adverbs qualify, through modified, not primary logic, deliniations of meaning, consistently and subtly, shading the extreme inclusive/exclusive logic through language. The grey area has a limited backward look into the inception of such language, and philology. can not trace the origin, in an exclusive set of membership.
Political ambiguity and contradiction then, are present in politics, Trumpism, St. Anselm, and even the Declaration of Independence utilize the progressive languages, whereby the logical nuances are exemplified.
Such declarations of basic rights, do not express the coming ambiguity between the coming inherent contradiction between rights of life, liberty and the enjoyment of life, in light of the non comprehension of factors of Capitalistic accumulation which may (and did) work against such prematurely ideal constructs, and hence when political scientists talk of a Constitutional Crisis, it is not too far a stretch to interpret. these in terms of absolute exclusivity. versus inclusivity between them, and the emergence of modified conceptual grey areas.
Logically, duality has been more based on intuitive levels of understanding, such as Kant brought into recognition .However, it is the correctness of such premature deliberations, that became a sort of foreseeable development, upon which Hegel, Marx, came to create their own developments.
Logic through the evolution of language, which finally reveals the actual contradictory experiences of living these logical. contradictions meaningful. bear them out in realitu5
Yes my English is not primarily of native origin but.acquired secondarily , so it plays into the differential systems between the logical systems.
That Hungarian, my first, is a very unique language type (I’ve heard it said) thanks for noticing.
Other than this I have nothing to add, and I brought Anselm, into the discussion , fully understanding the significance of his failure. Mixiing what now has been seen as two different kinds of systems of logic, literally exemplifies the two languages I am at times conflating. Incidentally Hungarian being the more literal language,not that this alone makes the difference
Finally, I’m not adverse to be found wrong, with differences of opinion of varying phonetical and grammatical systems of thought.