Trump enters the stage

What are the dehumanizing sources of social change? You really think that every man/woman has confusions?

The President tweeted,

"Dems are the problem, they don’t care about crime and want illegal immigrants no matter how bad they maybe, to pour into and infest our country.

And here is an editorial reply ,:

The President’s language further escalated his DEHUMANIZING rhetoric amid a developing humanitarian and political crisis on the US border with Mexico.

Now it becomes personal, when each child is separated from his/her parent. Think of the extreme trauma.

Or, is the justification offered by Mr. Sessions sufficiently credible - at this time, the matter is one of optical morality, with little or no precedent apart from the Japanese Internment.

Who is Trump dehumanizing? If anything, Democrats dehumanize their very own USA citizens by allowing catch and release of criminals (all illegals are criminals) and open borders with their illegal sanctuary cities and obstruction of justice. Anyone who wants to be a USA citizens needs to get in line with all the other immigrants and asylum seekers to fill out the paperwork to be vetted and given citizenship the legal way when it is their turn.

50,000 illegals try to cross the borders each month.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2u4Vlgr2iHs[/youtube]

If the parents cannot prove they are parents, then the kids should be and are removed from human traffickers. If the parents have valid documentation, then the kids should be kept with parents in their own area. But Democrats and some Republicans have done nothing but balk at the law rather than getting to work in Congress to change it so the families can remain together until they are deported or processed IN LINE for their right to stay.

Wendy: It is neither this or that , the left or right, it is the central issue of borders-boundaries , which is perceived as dehumanizing, in its scope . Its a catch 22, and rhetoric has lost its power to choose between them, which in very large painted in VERY LARGE letters, create a the myopia of being closer them reality , and create a the illusion that things can’t get personal , or even that they can. But they can and will, with a presumption that such does not exist.

But that it is and it requires a wide moral compass to apprehend, it almost appears a sui generis , whereas it blurs the line between its de-facto and de-jure elements.

It IS this and not that. There’s nothing dehumanizing about borders when they are approached with respect to the laws governing them.

Why is it dehumanizing when our country wishes to maintain its integrity with boundaries?
EDITED: A huge fucking rant.

I’m sure You understand why can’t reply with an expletive, but assure You regardless to any and every post made I will answer. wouldn’t do it to others and do not mean I have no nerve. Its something else.

Defensively, which I would never do on principle, reflect an Ediitorial response to Trump’s tweet is linked to responsibility to its poster, who happens to be a major newspaper. It may or may not carry over to me, but then its my decision.

As always: Meno

The word dehumanized originated with that newspaper response to the Trump tweet, and may or may not represent my views.

Any collusive act or attempt between groups, that changes intrinsic and assumed relationship between people, to attempt to. form less identifiable and specific group memberships , can be understood as dehumanizing members of the group in question.

By not differentiating children from a general population demotes special privileges children are assumed to be entitled to.

Lets say I belonged to a group experts having exclusive membership to that particular group by means of specific
skills, and someone were to make that membership more general and non specific in terms of qualifications dues, etc,. then that would lessen my required skills, knowledge and self worth as qualifiable as to that group’s requirements.That would dehumanize the qualifying of my conditions to membership.

#-o Huh?

Meno, when are you going to stop hating on Trump,inquiring minds want to know?

I am surprised at that interpretation. I so notnhabe any emotional reactions negative or positive, and my neutrality swings between the two sure, but amongst the fluctuations lays somewhere a happy middle ground, where things somehow manage to balance out there .

Recently I read in a philosophy website. I can research it where , months ago , but I was stupified to learn of some rigorous thinkers consider him basically a closer Kantian

I don’t know of there is such a thing as a philosophy derived from the statements, pronouncements and actions ofnaixj said thinker, but many of the elements suggested which can correlated to a middle course, surprisingly resonate with more people them previously thought.

That my personal biases are exposed, may be mitigated by some unconscious leaning s, however , consciously, try to set the course right down the middle, and as has been suggested Trump really defines a new Republicanism, whether its tending toward am independent course, which may be at this decisive times the developing voice of a hidden to arrive majority.

But to set that tone, both the left’s and the political right’s dynamics has to be exposed for what they are.

That we are all dubious to an extent of claims and counterclaims of various sorts .that need not tale away from the search for the truth of political reality.

But agree that at times . a bias can become evident in the most earnest of neutral positions.
I think he is a modified Kantian, yet infused with large doses of pragmatism.

Optics, made a goal of reading visible and invisible , and had not the time. Busy busy busy. This Trump White house is all consuming.

Verse , vex and cave epitomizes a calculus of deception of being in the cave , of vexing by uncommon verse. Know what a cave is and the word in it.In the cave is sure to vexing verse.

The optics captures the modality of this era, when perhaps by the thinnest of all metaphores, an idea can present itself so fleeting and absurd, that it may be true by its very unlikely probability, suspected to be true.

Maybe this whole revolting conflicting abroglio, is set up to create the unlikely scenario of a reverse effect.

May be the level of preception has a cause and effect turned upside down, and in popular notions described as ‘reverse psychology’

Perhaps to achieve a One World Order, traditional space time casualty may not work, because it’s too predictable. Maybe the choice of a President clown was just the ticket the Electoral College needed. So as to absolutely shut out any doubt as to the final outcome of the survival of Capital Russian aide is needed , even in the vesiges of nuclear war.The Democrats had it wrong , in this scenario because their plans orbited along the annex traditional political struggle dressed on politically correct idioms of expectations. How could a system of ‘freedom’ again as dressing for the principle surrounding the merits merits of Capital, not come under siege at a time when the optimal moment having arrived : the world capital fought for for nearly a century?

Trickle down of material did network : note the great recession, so maybe it’s opposite,: the trickle up of the acceptance of contradiction may

Take for example the idea of freedom
A cynical attitude has set in decades before the iron curtain fell, a system based on ideology of material dialectic
That fall was strangely, very silent, a pin drop in a world of military expenditures into the tens of trillions.

The level of acceptance of a world system cam not be described as within its own terms, the negation was too obvious, too insignificant in a world of signs

No the flair coming from acute social change has to be dresses up with flair and allusion, an elusive myth bound
Charm to retail upon a foundering new acquisition

Nothing else but drama, flair, showmanship could deceive the undertow of -what’s good for them- for they poor souls mistake form and structure, and its hard to argue from that to the very logistics of what it takes to achieve real peace, stability and Security
Security of peace and order, to remind citizens how others Earned them what they presently enjoy, through sacrifice, blood lettings in Real theaters of war, production through automation, and last , but not at all the least, the behmbling value of capital( which is not at all different from the monarchical structure of succession)

Without these elements, the theatre of absurd in a real way, could not have survived another great depression, it would have wiped out civilization itself

The retro image of a politically absurd inception of belief, that yes , the whole of it hinges on the conflict between the haves and the have not may have been pre planned as early as tjensyong embers of Brit colonial manifest came to a point of extinction. notably by HG Wells & Co.

H.G.Wells 'Country of the Blind-

Trump: crazy as a fox:

All the liberal newspapers are touting Trump’s ignorance by having China double dealing with the emerging vise tightening between the import export deficiency -and the NK controversy .

But maybe Trump outfoxed them: If China doesn’t help with the embargo and the denuclearization as a pivotal agent , then the trade issue will resurface with a vengeance, sending China into a recession unlike the last one.

Its sometimes overlooked how dependent the Chinese economic future is on US trade.

So it works both ways.

The Kantian compromise said to have failed with the immigration bill being voted down, perhaps a more utilitarian vote next week will validate its future. While this was going on, Trump blamed it on Democratic filibuster, which Trump proposed to do away with, but Mitch Mconnel. would have none of it. Is congressional power on the upswing?

Levels.

Levels. Levels.

Levels Levels Levels. The bottom which, from .

No obvious consequence, be cause, they’d. Immediate. Know.
Descent. no . out. Of sight.

Because its asked for the move of opposites, the extreme action before its birth, the double. Birth of the double. Make it quick and automatic. Leveling itself, so as to become.

The lowest level, the why of creation embedded in a crystal.
Here overcoming if, by fearless acceptance, the higher powers lost foothold, so as to manifest invisibility and compiled reticence from any basis of want.

Here appearance rules the ignorant, the willfull and the soulless and egofull.

The firstevel here becomes the last, a book coveted by a presumed innocent compilation , on one level. The beginning and the end only covers a magical make believe tour through the imagined mystery, in any case,

In every space, vieing for a place, destroying for position.
The passing by of this level like a sleight of hand, but barbaric upon possession, as a real habitat.

The unreal to be feared hence the possession of the second page, not least the chapter, in manifold succession of perceived fate.

But, the second, oh tremulous and terrifying, to leave, at first, the first, unrepentant thing, but to leave, yes from that person to that, unassailably unabashed,

Secrets revealed, to one that worthy that above such, only the scent of blue above and green.

Below the whips of the gentlest, feel, and not defy this odor of the silence.

That second held, as long, into a passing , gentle into the night,
and from there innumerable worlds, the center oh but it is danger there, don’t look there. because it will draw out the spirit, and for others you must stay that enormity of that sliver of connect.

The third granted be assured, as automata write, to you/me, can’t be helps, tsk task, incurable that third, the dance of the three oranges, of Paris’ judgement, of Joseph and his brothers
taking nearifetime, for that, third.

And as so, the tree supports it, but before you can solve the enormity of the multifold confusion weighing down , coveting it barely minimum. Conveyance, pressing down .
On the three legs with such outstanding venom,

Before that heaven.

The formidable he’ll must below conquered to support its incorrigible return, a return so repetitious, that making it certain to happen now, split second by split second, forces an instant tear in the masks of time.

Then the passage, having conquered itself results in an immediate clearing of all doubt impinge by an immortal promise, and the impinging of all the inverted be . an end above would no have the key, because it was lost ,

Some time ago, in one forlorn desert of the times, becoming never an object anyways.

As long and soon this is captured, it becomes itself.

This is the blemishless key of desire to the ring of fire, the Kundalini of the rite, to preserve, but not for you.

This is the long sleep’s demand from congress Eros to the magnificent journey of the firebird.

As to that , in ref… to Crowley, as to the Trance of Sorrow, the Trance is like Samadhi, but the Black Brothers, a willful dissociation.

Feel comfortable with it., per this nihilistic illness.

Illness: as a metaphore. Suzan Sontag had it right, the metaphore foreshadowed the general framework under which democracy was able to thrive under a capitalistic system, and removed in time, from the highs of post war economy, which sizzled , the euphoric state mere lasting only a mere decade, followed by the revolt and the struggles of discontent and civil rights, worked under a disturbing craved mirror optics, of what freedom really meant.

Freedom as played down in the Bill of Rights, has a hidden caveat: it has to be affordable. When its no longer dependent on a measure of qualification , the transition into quantification becomes evident.

That the social elements of changing material manifestations of the equation, the sustenance of optical illusions becomes necessary in light of increasing social unrest: the obvious misuse of police power and the courts, the relaxing of reified legal guidelines in reference to equalizing societal norms, began to operate on even a cosmetic diminishing of returns of value.

The values relaxed were of relaxing moral guidelines as opposed to ethical standards, to compensate the pleasurable and consequently specific goal oriented reversals on a lot of previously ethical and general frameworks.

This process , a near term temporary band aide, pre figuring the abrogation of freedoms to privacy and the understanding of what became politically correct, confounded ethics and morality, to what nowadays is aptly figures as the diminishing difference between facts and fake news, to an extent that has come down to incontrovertible logic.

The leap from an obvious contradiction, to a field generating a social mirror consisting of mirror nearonic understanding, a rhetoric of faulty reflexive attempts to contravene, makes computerized social fields posdible.

Trumpism is a testament to this weakness and grows on its energy, softening the outlook toward a growth into the middle technocracu, unimaginable even a year ago.

Case at hand: Trump’s reversal and the credibility floating into acceptance of fake news, liberal fault as basis of American decline, tolerance to moral weakness.

The thing is , the reality of this incursion and violation of Rights to checks and balances, have appear to have diminished, as these agents become less and less tolerant into their own sets of collusion, albeit hidden, but now prepared to project external illusive agencies.

Latest: Mattis reverse on Russian danger, in meet with Putin
Mattis meets Chinese premier and is warned to hands
Off Chinese claimed islands .significance in American
military chief to visit Peking in decades.
Kim reverses and begins nuclear development
Trump’s popularity in Harvard poll up to 49%
Immigration bill does not pass Congress
Civil war is likely- 30% of population thinks so

Trump=Trumpism is a philosophical equivalent both of God , and Popeye the sailor. : In as much they both proclaim - ‘I am who I am’! In an article a disillusioned writer, whose article I was tempted to add here- which I still may, made me realize the simplicity of the reinvention of failed deontology, by virtue of the simple logical truism: that such logical inconsistency is really a very simple affair:

The bipolar ideology, of Capitalistic Democracy and Soviet Communism has by sheer gravity, landed the so metal contract between men and the state absolutely without ground.

As a consequence, the Dasein of Heidegger has come back to haunt with the primal question: what in the earth subsist in the mind of intention thatcould have regressed our selfvaluing to this abysmal cynicism and duplicity, that ingratiate us via our mirror neural misrepresentations, as to render them unassailable?

The answer is simple as well: decency and honesty has been bought, sold out by terror flooding our social ego.

And within that fear subsist the terror of losing, looking everything we hold dear.

We’d rather loose our reason, then to loose that within which our minds subsist: our possessions and escalating albeit diminishing returns of such said possessions.

The more I think about it, the more parallels can be found between the fall of Rome, and our very apparent and imminent fall.

The danger is, that the whole world lives in some kind hush, an expectation, a sign, for a gift, which will come to be, because they foreshadow it with their will.

Left wing billionaire Tom Steger said at a conference that we may need a nuclear war to set Trump straight, which he later corrected.

But really, if there was a nuclear argemodden , the elite with equipped shelters for maybe years of survival, may count on like minded fellows, to share the remaining spoils, even at the cost of a dramatic tetrogtessioninto pre modernism, and settle again in a ‘normal’ retroactive life of pursuance of the finer things in life.

Hundreds of millions were lost in past wars to pursue the ideal life, and only those raised in their appreciative wake, could really keep teal civilization going forward, therefore the statistics can bear out a real qualitative overcoming

Oh my, Justice Kennedy’s son , working for Deutsche Bank, borrowed Trump 1 billion hey there!

Trump has nstinct for survival , unwittingly denying everything but the application of absolute belief in its opposite :power, -(instilling its contradictory nature:)survival by instinct.

There. Is no denying that he operates on the very basic level of contradiction., signaling no intention of reconstructive plans, only bottom wring belief in fortification through isolating any non effective outside sources of influence.

Maybe an economic necessity drove him to this conclusion. The problems with this is manifold , but. it remains to be seen if the rhetoric does not eclipse the outcome , with precedent in the ideas was instituted prior to WW1. A Finlandia copy may work. and it has been suggested that a subordination to Russia may be underneath this posture.

Here is another contradiction: Some or most people in the United States believe that the EU and China are ripping this country off in trade and intellectual property ripoff, what they do not see is why a rich man should worry about what happens to the lower 98%, where the upper crust has 3 people who own 50 % of all U.S. equity. Why should this people worry, except that the open trade one world policy would assure a secure continuity of their life as they expect it to continue?

This contradiction is so obvious as to cover a basic fallacy of the opposite being the fact.

Now the acid test . Is it ingenious to begin a trade war with China and.Europe ,where notable economosts have proclaimed it a.total foreseeable failure?

Europe can ocxupy previpusly US held markets inclusing those of China ,while strengthenimg.their economic and politocal ties ,while weakening am isolated US? Or, reversely ?
This is.tje acid test , of which outcome will determine the sought after goal perhaps decades to come . History will be the ultimate judge .

There are possible limiting factors looming in the background with coming conflict with the war now with Corporate America.
GM and Harley Davidson are outsourcing some production overseas, to dampen their perceived damage do to their production and sales on account of the trade war. US Nail sees itself shutting down because of the tarriff on imported steel.

The administration has poo-pood the corporate revolts as indications of corporate greed over concern for the American worker. However this hypothesis is yet to be tested out.

Marx has had quite a long track record by now, of showing at least partial dependence on an anticonsequentialiam , whereupon the failure of the measure of how the historical progression of limits may be exposed for what values are determinate in the near and far future.

Does this imply the failure of market orientation toward reasonable approximations within bracketed or limited evaluations of capital distribution?

Limits are nothing new, and the topology overall , psychological-Levin at. al.: Cantor -set theory, Jimmy Carter-politics, all expause concern with it.

At this juncture of a.desired turnnback into the duplicious and currently untested quasi limitless marketplace, does a politically and socially yet to be defined return to such, correspond to the probably evolving tapestry of a one world order?

Some say that such ignominious and untested theory combining a retro proven hierarchy of broad yet antiquated lines of demarked progressive accumulation with the impending limits , are beginning to show a strain which has been adequately described with the Dutch tulip craze , at a time when people believed almost sacramoniously in the magical foundation. of value.

Notables speaking of the certain demise of the crypto market, its unsoundness tipyfied as nothing but another fraudulent way of placing value on nothing but hope of giant gains on merely on magical beliefs of unending trust of increase.

A Ponzi scheme , unlike the international use of currency, which again is devoid of nothing but the guarantee on national economy, a guarantee that governments are not.in a rush to give credence to. The few institutions that have given underlying support are limited in size as well as number.

This newest scheme is maybe representative of the need to figure value into risk above and beyond the staid returns in the conventional markets.

The bet that bitcoin will earn legitimacy or not , does not go well with its dramatic valuations so far. The run up has been preconfigured by statistical , computerized analysis of psychological demand and supply curves( that is why only a limited number have been minted-since such an ongoing computerized study is near impossible to manage, in a limitless matrix.

So how it was prefigured, goes hand in hand with how it is managed.

Such isn’t he sign of.unlimited optimism that launched the scope and size of the conditions under which ‘pure capital’ can be expanded and sustained.

Is limitless as a concept sustainable in this sense , or its expanded applications?

Why is it that older people are unable to live on current rates of interest? Well, because the interest is held low, so as to not result in a run away inflation that would entail principal to be eaten away by too many 0’s : a situation reminiscent of a post war Germany, where people were losing strength to carry their suitcases full of near worthless paper.

The war on poverty is just as.much of a war, where instead of bullets. People die on streets of oblivion and dire suffering

The U.S. ambassador recently objected to a EU paper detailing poetry in America, supposedly the richest nation on earth, as inconsequential and ill founded.

Are limits , currently being instituted on a variety of social programs show the other side of the limitless value of the ultimate Democracy in the world?

So it depends on what side of the set limits the line is drawn, as difficult it is not to devolve into the language of contradiction.

The physics of gravitational pull of so called Democratic Institutions are too strong a pull, if all is considered.

A glowing report by a conservative fiscal analyst has placed Trump and Trumpism in a glowing light of ’ changing America in a new era,
changing the face of Amrica, with withdrawing from worn out allowances , from demanding more con tributions from NATO, of demanding more equalization in trade, and generally forging ahead with replacing this country into the appropriate role of leader of the free world.

Employment is up, market equity is up, and his popularity is soaring elsewhere than among his very close knit and loyal constituency.

Just today out of a fiscal conservative think tank.