Marx has had quite a long track record by now, of showing at least partial dependence on an anticonsequentialiam , whereupon the failure of the measure of how the historical progression of limits may be exposed for what values are determinate in the near and far future.
Does this imply the failure of market orientation toward reasonable approximations within bracketed or limited evaluations of capital distribution?
Limits are nothing new, and the topology overall , psychological-Levin at. al.: Cantor -set theory, Jimmy Carter-politics, all expause concern with it.
At this juncture of a.desired turnnback into the duplicious and currently untested quasi limitless marketplace, does a politically and socially yet to be defined return to such, correspond to the probably evolving tapestry of a one world order?
Some say that such ignominious and untested theory combining a retro proven hierarchy of broad yet antiquated lines of demarked progressive accumulation with the impending limits , are beginning to show a strain which has been adequately described with the Dutch tulip craze , at a time when people believed almost sacramoniously in the magical foundation. of value.
Notables speaking of the certain demise of the crypto market, its unsoundness tipyfied as nothing but another fraudulent way of placing value on nothing but hope of giant gains on merely on magical beliefs of unending trust of increase.
A Ponzi scheme , unlike the international use of currency, which again is devoid of nothing but the guarantee on national economy, a guarantee that governments are not.in a rush to give credence to. The few institutions that have given underlying support are limited in size as well as number.
This newest scheme is maybe representative of the need to figure value into risk above and beyond the staid returns in the conventional markets.
The bet that bitcoin will earn legitimacy or not , does not go well with its dramatic valuations so far. The run up has been preconfigured by statistical , computerized analysis of psychological demand and supply curves( that is why only a limited number have been minted-since such an ongoing computerized study is near impossible to manage, in a limitless matrix.
So how it was prefigured, goes hand in hand with how it is managed.
Such isn’t he sign of.unlimited optimism that launched the scope and size of the conditions under which ‘pure capital’ can be expanded and sustained.
Is limitless as a concept sustainable in this sense , or its expanded applications?
Why is it that older people are unable to live on current rates of interest? Well, because the interest is held low, so as to not result in a run away inflation that would entail principal to be eaten away by too many 0’s : a situation reminiscent of a post war Germany, where people were losing strength to carry their suitcases full of near worthless paper.
The war on poverty is just as.much of a war, where instead of bullets. People die on streets of oblivion and dire suffering
The U.S. ambassador recently objected to a EU paper detailing poetry in America, supposedly the richest nation on earth, as inconsequential and ill founded.
Are limits , currently being instituted on a variety of social programs show the other side of the limitless value of the ultimate Democracy in the world?
So it depends on what side of the set limits the line is drawn, as difficult it is not to devolve into the language of contradiction.
The physics of gravitational pull of so called Democratic Institutions are too strong a pull, if all is considered.