Kompromat

We’re going to obliterate whiteness all throughout the west destroying the European Caucasian wherever they exist. There will be no insurrection, defiance, push-back, separatism, or rebellion, what can go wrong? Nothing I tell you, the plan is perfect!

We Jews will formalize a world government because as God’s destiny being fulfilled as the chosen we’re destined to rule the entire planet and with our genocide of the Palestinian people as you can see we’ll stop at nothing to do so. The end justifies the means and nothing is beyond our abilities in achieving that end.

Kushner is partly under attack for the current flareup in the Middle East.
Instead of looking at causes, which hinges on reverse thinking sandwiched on doubtful effects to their causal claims, take historical signposts of causal certainty in terms of historic unaffected guidelines. They are not equivocal at all , and be at in mind they are not fodder to connect causes and their apparent outcomes, but merely events catalogued as unaffected historical records. Can one think of some?
On the forefront is the question of Arab unity as Arab Brotherhood.

Much is slung about this supposed societal feature of Middle Eastern real-social-politic, but is this really
a’ real’ real of most current descriptions of what really is going on? Is not the social unsophistication more to the point where regionalism and tribalism are more to the point?

Historically the facts bear this out. Jordan is the most convincing in an apparently undisguised manner in which the King there, a U.S. friend, refused to open up Trans-Jordan to Palestinian immigration there. The factionalism between the Shia and the Sunnies are a perpetual mobile of unsorted and inconclusive proof of un- certain claims to land and sovereignty between those groups as well.

The idea that these sorts of conflicts among unfriendly tribes, giving hate toward a common enemy, again, gives rise to very basic social -psychological defensive posture, again on a primary level.

Not accounting for such, but bypassing them, makes the reality sandwich extremely thin, disguised in populist terms, and perhaps giving a deliberately oblique view to the shakers, the intelligencia and the movers of those countries a bad taste of exemplarism, as hypocritical and self serving in those countries. Further, disociating a good and bad will of the West’s intentions.

Nah, who will you hire as pesonal assistents? And how will your Nuremburg Laws work? I mean the ones to determine race.

Either the facade parody Jew or the underlying separatist Joker…

What will either of you do with all the mixed race people? Adoptees? Interracial marriages? Professional partnerships?

You don’t want to inhibit the freedom of Jews or whites-

Well, at least your not national socialist, that has a ten year max duration and leads to the destruction of many of your own race.

The Kalergi Plan, we need to take out the white Europeans because they’re the only opposition to take us on in competition or opposing us. Our program against whiteness is progressing very well since the 1960’s.

All non Jews make up for a good servile population and we’re not really worried about them.

And the Nuremberg Laws when separating?

What about them?

It is great that we destroyed national socialism in Europe during World War II, it was the only political threat against us as it collectivized the Europeans in a form of organization that threatened our power or influence everywhere.

Being that we control capitalism and marxism we’ve essentially neutered or neutralized European whites where if they keep following both politics they’ll be within our realm of control.

And the Nuremberg Laws when separating?
[/quote]
What about them?
[/quote]
Well, you gotta figure out in your real and then fake Jewish separatisms how to deal with all the boundary cases, grey areas and close relations between races. IOW your own Nuremberg Laws.

Now you’re not making any sense at all.

Wendy has claimed you are a separatist, there are gray areas, hence the Nuremberg laws.

Nuremberg was pretty black and white. I’m unable to follow your rhetoric here.

This is a paradigm of how grey areas can give rise uncertainty, defeating deontological focus, used referentially as if it made some kind of objective sense possible.
A reductive gesture to a black and white argument failing a compromising situation, its a dilusive attempt to bring back to solvency that which can not again appear in concentrated forms.

Literally, Nuremberg could never due justice on what went on in those concentrated concentration camps.
They were not existential contraptions they were not merely metaphors of illness, they were epochs that prevented clarity in movement from sterile nihilism forwards or backwards

They literally and figuratively landed into a definitive black hole , from which escape was not possible or even conceivable.

Both: anti-semite and jew were caught in an inescapable paradoxical situation.

Ref: Sartre, ‘Reflexion sur question juive’.(in broad context) ed.1946 Edition Morihien

I am so glad the Soviets discovered those concentration camps before anybody else including the Americans. Thankfully the Bolsheviks were on our side…

Well, exactly. It was to get rid of gray areas.
The N laws laid out who was considered Jewish - amongst other things it did. Wendy says you are she are racial separatists. What will your parallel to the Nuremberg laws be. IOW how will you separate? What percentages of genes? What about adopted kids of other races? etc.

I fail to see the importance of the comparison.

Again, you are avoiding my point. What interest me about you is the extent to which you have thought through my contention that, with respect to issues like Putin’s hold on Trump [and support for Trump’s policies], your own particular “I” [here and now] is rooted in the manner in which I have come to construe the parameters of human identity [re dasein…an existential contraption] out in the is/ought world. Or, instead, is it anchored more to a philosophical/moral/political assessment that you are able to demonstrate is applicable to all men and women who wish to be thought of as rational human beings.

Are you willing to concede that perhaps your own values here are just one more example of run-of-the-mill political prejudices rooted largely in the life that you lived? Or are you convinced instead that a reasonable man must accept that those who think like “one of us” are either much closer to the objective truth or do in fact already embody it.

Besides, over and again I make it quite clear that my own understanding of nihilism is no less an existential contraption subject to change given new experiences, new relationships and new sources of information.

Just like you and your own value judgments.

Choose a context. Choose conflicting assessments of right and wrong behavior.

Then note for us the manner in which a true nihilist would react to that discussion.

More Kid stuff?

I asked Wendy a few questions that might enable us to understand better how and why she came to think and to feel as she does about Trump and Russia.

Then you react to this as you did.

It’s so ludicrous [from my point of view] I can’t help but wonder if the irony on display isn’t perhaps itself just another level of play acting.

Help me to get to the bottom of what actually motivates you to post as you do on threads like this.

^^^^Biggie,

You’re a fake pretentious nihilist (not a real one) that leans politically left and neo liberal in self described values, got it. :wink:

I bet you’re a voter also.