I do not know what the essence of.this vitriol is, only my intuition serves me right? Them the following conclusion s I may make
Knowing human nature , the speaker of the group is either a sore PhD slighted outcast, no one on tenure for sure, or a poor hostility bound person , disgruntled with his lot.
No one on his right mind would attack a person upon entrance, and accuse him iaong ad-hominy as he did.
Unless: the person advertised as ‘Guess’ is a disgruntled ex member, who has like any others misunderstood philosophical personages qua personages, and cleaning society into various segments, as per social class particularly and appealing to ’ The Group’ , in the manner of contradictory logic . There may be value to this politically and psychologically, but not philosophically, and as my intuition proved that this was the intent to Heidegger, e.I, to differentiate the types of disciplines against conflating them: it is surprising he did not comment on this . given the venue of fair play ‘swirling’ around Dasein.
Therefore , and thusly, I rest my case.
I tried to remind the group that I am a minimalist with added masochistic tendencies in line with Swann of Proust, in enjoying this tete-a-tete immensely.
We and the group can learn from anybody, that is a great sign of accruing wisdom.
And to more specific, modification of the above is called for. I am not proud of my ‘gift’, in fact at times it is painful. As the present case present a itself.
No this is not a ‘professional’ for professionals so not speak thus.
This is somebody still here, with adopting another persona. I’m sure of it
A person, who adopted this technique so as to avoid damaging his other ones, and that is fear, the presence of the very fear he trumpeting in another forum. And for sure, the feeding source of the hate that another forum describes, fitting into the complacency that such collusive rhetoric can generate within the general divisive atmosphere of today.
That this person had an ax to grind toward me o cam attest to by the very confusing pm’s that were addressed to me in pretty much the same time, and so an undeniable continuity can be drawn between the two not so subtle incarnations.
That I’m not going after a red herring after this is certain, but I remind this person that there was a time that I was offering comfort to ease his admittedly guilty conscience about what some of omissions he committed with others.
I will rest here, and offer an olive branch, because if he thinks that i am fazed, or harbor ill will or anger, or anything else about him, then I must assure him he doesn’t know me.