What all men ought to do

Does Joe bother to wonder about free will? I think free will itself is an academic non issue.

Joe wonders what he’s gonna do about Mary’s abortion given that she holds a conflicting good. You ask what ought he to do that he can understand, that isn’t a barren intellectual contraption in other words?

He ought to accept fate and understand that whatever he does will be the final thing that happens, and also everything that happens around what he does, as a reaction or in any way interacting. He has a body of knowledge of his own that he then must make full and honest use of. If he is rational.

If a man walks with his fate into his fate, the universe can pull everything it has on him, as fate can assimilate everything in a weight that accumulates like the intricate ornaments on a hereditary sword, that is to say significantly and magically but not crudely like pounds of flesh.

Only those with hereditary weight on their belt will recognize another and negotiate terms. But between fate and floating there is the pathos of distance. Holywood and the Bible are like magical smokescreen fireworks whirling above this abyss to pretend its al fun and games to try and cross it.

This sword is the preserver of chaos; in the hereditary engravings on this soul/weapon the matter is kept irreducible to any standing or pretending order, keeping free will and thus the cosmos anchored. This prerogative of preserving the anchors of being through fate/free will rather than obedience and deduction, is what causes the moral dilemma for the passive man, the fact that the gangster will always appeal way beyond any mere adolescent power fetish; rather the gangster proves to the law abiding man that he abides by the law of his own volition an self valuing. And so stories separate the chaff from the wheat long before an adult is born. We know the risks early on, and a humans game of coming into adulthood is a mosaic of secrets arranged so as to seem a white dress.

Just an excuse to get dirty.

Fair enough. But we’re discussing rational men rather than princes of the universe or gangsters. Gangsters aren’t rational because they don’t need to communicate or worry about ought, they just do. Not to mention free will is a useless concept to princes of the universe. They fight for survival.

Rational men are members of a society. They need a rational that they can agree on so that the society is valued over the individual and thus allow the society to even exist. But they still have feelings. They care about whether Mary aborts.

Call it a destiny that is not manifest, because it englobes all of everything, how could all of everything be manifest? It would be like the story of the emperor making a map the size and detail of the actual realm.

Fate. Fate puts things in perspective for princes as much as car mechanics whose book was banned an wife wants to abort.

Phaer. Its just I feel about social contract theory like you feel about Heidegger.

If someone wants my opinion it that abortions are absolutely immoral in the west because of decline in birth rate and the west is the best, on top of the fact that a child is the only thing that can tame a woman, on top of the fact that it is a horrendous procedure that might (or might) not be murder but is absolutely life-negating in its structural essence. But my opinion is not my wisdom. My wisdom tells me not to interfere with womans life giving and taking powers unless she has committed to me.Too messy to ever come to objective grips with, like trying to make the sun give off heat without being so hard to look into.

Well no see cause the contracts in place in the first world, the only place it actually exists (more crudely also in the second, wealthy commie nations), lead directly as they are to a senator getting tortured in my third world paradise.

These people need to chill the fuck out and think it through.

Btw, the third world also exists in the ghettos of the US (where Trump made his bones) and the first in the isolated bubbles of upper middle class of Venezuela.

They think they got it aaaaaaall figured out.

But bam. Fate. Your need to feel justified in your cantankerousness results in slow painful deaths of millions.

No changing that now. But fate keeps rolling. What will you do now?

Yes, hypocrisy always has a price that isn’t worth paying for it.
The social contract is a way to understand evolution otherwise than as the product of sexual selection.
It is what gives rise to Hegel.

Hypocracy is moralistic [the term], it poses an instead of. There is no such thing. Only what has been and what will be.

And what is, of course.

No I believe it is a technical term, denoting the act of making a demonstrably ungrounded claim to a moral position in order to get away with some advantage.

In this sense all foreign policy before Trump has been hypocrisy.

Mary and her books.

Well and after Constantine.

“to a moral position”

Exactly, to a moral position, an instead of. It is a lie before it is amoral.

Philosophers provide truth to the people. I give John fate, moral correctness would be a lie.