Capital the hidden ideal as envisioned by Atlas Shrugged, has a very simple premise for its undoing.
Capital and Democracy are not natural co-ordinates,jointly and directly proportional, to the same forces caused by internal and external factors; the momentum of their move ment and their vectors separate
At times the separation is minimal and re-constructanle, of certain limits to su h allow enough depth to the evolving margin, so as to enable sufficient corrections to modify the unwanted effects of total marginal corruptibility.
Corruption is used in a hyper relative sense, that is topographic and open to analysis of symptomatic signs of stealing, collusion , and baseless manipulation.
But corruption in the widest sense also considers the probable curvature of what Marcuse used to call devolvement of structural depth unto one dimensional linerality.
Actions by impulse and insufficiently based criteria, will insubstantiate.
The fact may be hiding on the universal grasp on denial of historical artifact.
Building the U.S. great again is an example of adopting contradictory messages to the world stage. Most of Eurasia labors in a world historicism of long established boundaries, whereas U.S. apostasy, is structured on denying those boundaries. The political reactivism contrasts strongly with boundaries per-se, because the figurative basis clashes with its substantive construct.
Its like a newly rich but very crass person moving next to an established and ancient respected one, for whom it would appear de-class to consider their substantial wealth as opposed to their standing and lineage.
The abstract firms of ideology are superior to the ones which have merely a wide range of applications of advantage and utility, merely using market mechanisms to buy opportunity, such as those involved in hostile take-over, - creating the widest interpretation of opportunism.
It has been shown that internal competition may work on this level within national boundaries, and schools of thought have shown that if kept in those bounds, will minimize national boundaries within the constraint of separate and almost equal competitors on that stage of a reduced theater.
However an international stage, may not fathom an unbounded ergo unfounded theater-which can transform a seemingly harmless war over trade, into one where such war can create a real theater of real war.
This has precedent, and Trumpism at this moment may be unable the certain leakage between borders.
Here are a series of articles which brings these possibilities into the open:
WORLD WAR 3: Russian minister warns nuclear treaties under threat as relations plunge
Nuclear missile
Russian nuclear missile cruiser submarine Yuri Dolgoruky launches a Bulava missile (Image: GETTY)
SKY-HIGH tensions between the US and Russia are putting critical treaties designed to prevent a nuclear arms race in jeopardy as relations sink to an all-time low, a senior Russian official has warned.
By SIMON OSBORNE
Moscow’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov described Western governments as “adversaries, not friends” and said a “complete malfunction of the American system” meant longstanding weapons agreements could be binned, leaving nuclear powers without constraint in the event of a future conflict.
He said: “We could lose several elements on arms control infrastructure. The building is shaky.”
Mr Rybakov warned another round of sanctions intruded by Donald Trump in the summer were “dangerous” and getting in the way of negotiations over renewing the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty “New START” which saw both sides agree to reduce their deployed nuclear arms by half but is set to expire in 2021.
He said: “If there is no progress then risk of a real backfire grows.
RELATED ARTICLES
Russia WARNING: ‘Do not underestimate Kremlin’ after GRU blunders
World War 3: Romania warning as Russia steps up Black Sea operations
“I don’t think we can easily say the future of New START is bright.
“We truly do not see any desire on the US side at this point to engage in discussions on an extension ion the treaty which we have proposed.”
Mr Ryabkov was speaking as negotiators from the two countries met in Geneva to discuss a Cold War era treaty that was supposed to keep expansion of long-range nuclear-capable missiles in check.
Moscow and Washington have repeatedly accused each other of breaching the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, a 1987 pact which bans firing land-based missiles with a range of up to 5,500km.
Tupolev Tu-22M3M supersonic strike bomber
A new Tupolev Tu-22M3M supersonic strike bomber is unveiled in Kazan, Russia (Image: GETTY)
The US ambassador to NATO warned Moscow against developing a new cruise missile that could be armed with nuclear warheads, arguing that it was in breach of the INF and could be used against members of the Western military alliance.
Kay Bailey Hutchison said: “Counter measures by the United States would be to take out the missiles that are in development by Russia in violation of the treaty. They are on notice.”
The US government took a more aggressive line against Russia this year, when Mr Trump unveiled a new nuclear strategy that revolved around countering Russia and called for the development of small tactical nuclear weapons that were cheaper to maintain and could be used in more realistic scenarios.
Washington has also accelerated long-running US military plans to develop new intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and nuclear-capable cruise missiles and has just confirmed hypersonic weapons testing is well underway.
RELATED ARTICLES
HYPERSONIC ARMS RACE: US military chiefs vow to beat Russia and China
World War 3: US steps up arms race with new hypersonic missile tests
The sabre-rattling comes against a grim backdrop of mistrust with over the crisis in Ukraine, the conflict in Syria, allegations of Russian meddling in US elections and the Kremlin’s role in the attempt to assassinate former intelligence agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury.
Mr Ryabkov said: “We have a situation that is much, much worse than even during the most heated moments, or rather the coldest moments, of the past.”
He said Moscow would not be swayed by Dutch, British and US claims its agents had also sought to hack into the computer network of The Hague-based Office for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons as it investigated the attack on Mr Skripal.
He said: ”If some believe that this makes an impression on Russia and somehow causes Russia to hesitate, then that is a very wrong conclusion.
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov (Image: GETTY)
“On the contrary, a consolidated effort to pressurise Russia only diminishes chances of any real engagement towards resolution.
He said Moscow was not concerned about the growingly negative rhetoric coming from the West because it viewed Western governments as “adversaries, not friends”.
He said: “We do not believe that the broader West are friends with us. Rather, we see the West as an adversary that acts to undermine Russia’s positions and Russia’s perspective for normal development.
“So why should we care so much about our standing among adversaries?”
RELATED ARTICLES
Russia reveals hypersonic missile able to reach US in MINUTES
Putin aims to CRANK UP his armed forces with FUTURISTIC weapons
Russia’s Su-57 fighter jets to be equipped with SUPERSONIC MISSILES
ADVERTISEMENT
NEXT ARTICLE
EU news Yanis Varoufakis Italy Matteo Salvini Jean Claude Juncker Europe disintegrate
Doomed EU? Varoufakis claims Salvini’s Italy pushing Brussels closer to ‘DISINTEGRATION’
And now Clinton hits back:
HILLARY CLINTON
Clinton strikes back at Trump for saying she colluded with Russia
The president has been making his former rival an issue on the midterms campaign trail.
by Adam Edelman / Oct.12.2018 / 6:07 PM GMT
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at Oxford University on Oct. 9, 2018.Neil Hall / EPA
SHARE THIS —
Hillary Clinton is hitting back at President Donald Trump for having claimed at a recent rally — without providing any evidence — that she was the one who colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential contest.
At a rally on Wednesday night in Erie, Pennsylvania, Trump directly accused Clinton of engaging in a conspiracy with Moscow to influence the race for the White House.
“There was collusion between Hillary, the Democrats and Russia,” Trump said, just after his supporters had chanted “lock her up” about Clinton. “There was a lot of collusion with them and Russia and lots of other people.”
Trump has discussed that theory publicly and on Twitter, but the charge amounted to a direct allegation that Clinton herself conspired with the Russian government to influence the election. He offered no evidence of his claim.
The idea prompted a swift Clinton comeback.
“Seriously, you asked Russia to hack me on national television,” she tweeted Thursday afternoon.
The tweet was apparently in reference to a July 2016 press conference in which Trump invited the Russians to “find” thousands of missing emails from a personal server Clinton had used when she was secretary of state.
“I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said then.
Minutes after Clinton tweeted Thursday, Donald Trump Jr. fired back, claiming that Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee had spent millions of dollars “working with foreign agents” to create a “fake dossier with them.”
“You should really sit this one out,” he told Clinton, adding that “every time you talk, we win.”
Trump Jr.’s tweet was referring to the fact that a law firm representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC helped fund opposition research that eventually became a controversial dossier, known as the Steele dossier, on then-candidate Trump.
The back-and-forth comes as special counsel Robert Mueller continues to investigate whether Trump and his campaign colluded with Russia or obstructed justice afterward.