5,5,3 rule

5 heartbreaks of relationship
5 stages a sex dimorphic species must go through to not contradict sex
3 abuses

I also put in the three objectifications

You can circumvent the three objectifications by using one or more of the three abuses .

Direct approach “would you like to go out with me sometime?”

Ornate approach: watching sports

Even if I could “give” you all women, that would be approach escalation by proxy.

I like your use of molestation, it’s a better word than rape, because the issue is cognitive age.

You must believe that there is no such thing as body language, that facial expressions express nothing, and finally that tone of voice conveys nothing.

Because if you do not… it stands to reason that some people are simply more adept at reading body language, discerning facial expressions and understanding tone of voice.
That those are skills we can acquire as we socialize with other people… and like with any other skill we could develop a test for social skills and categorize people’s ability as average, good or bad.
Most people do in fact think like I do, because it’s common knowledge that such methods of communication exist…

That some people who are bad at it delude themselves into thinking they are good at it, is neither here nor there.

I agree that in general women don’t seem to want desperate, socially awkward men… I don’t know that this is a disaster for women, as much as it is for the desperate, socially awkward men.
If you’re suggesting a scenario would develop where the male no longer cares for consent… well, at that point the METHOD of communication seems irrelevant, no?

Women use body language different than men do, as I already brought up. Most women flirt 24/7 with no intention of ever having sex with those men. You claim to have the secret knowledge of when those cues are just for you. You’re a rapist trying to justify himself.

It’s not secret knowledge… it’s common knowledge

I don’t know about you, but I grew up on a planet filled with boys and girls, men and women… where we were raised by men AND women.
That’s where most of us learned how to socialize… this is not our first day interacting with members of the opposite sex so as to be dumbfounded by their strange and alien behavior.

Does that mean a women can’t purposefully lead men on in order to get something out of them? Of course not… men do it too
I said the language was precise I didn’t claim people don’t lie and manipulate.

And the only way I’m a rapist, is if you’re an idiot.

It’s a logical and cognitive age issue that you are a rapist. I’ve raped this way as well, approaching women with the intent of my behavior eliciting hopeful sexual contact.

Forcing women to have sex with you, with their consent.

When the cognitive age grows older, it is understood that approaching women in anyway is causing the destruction of the earths ecosystem. Which is a consent violation.

You can easily appeal to people as dumb as you, to agree that you’re not a rapist. Most people don’t want to experience the horror of the magnitude of the realization that every sexual encounter on earth thus far has been rape. Yours and mine (was) akin to taking advantage of invalids and the mentally handicapped. The problem is that you’re still refusing to accept that you’ve yet to take on the responsibility of your actions to this regard. You haven’t turned into a man yet, just a child in a mans body who knows somewhere that what he does is wrong.

Let me explain this further. It can take decades for a person to realize that their consent was manufactured against their will in ignorance …

You’re still the type of guy trying to get away with it.

You totally ignored my point that men flirt only when they want sex and women flirt 24/7.

You HAVE to play mind reading games, by definition, to assume the flirting is targeted just at you in a sincere way.

No need for further clarification… I believe you’ve demonstrated your mental capacity sufficiently.

You argue just like iambiguous…

“Hey look everyone, I didn’t address his core argument, look what a fool I made of him!”

I have to say also, one of the most common traits in people that’s a character flaw, is their bull headed insistence on trying to defend their entire narrative structure …

When I tell people that had the world been a better place in the past, that none of us would have been born today, they can’t enter that place because it excludes their narrative.

You are a rapist, so was I, statutory rape, extremely intelligent women and who consented to me, who I ended up more intelligent than them.

Your narrative is still stuck on defending all of your decisions instead of none of them.

As long as you stay stuck there, you’ll still be the thing you hate.

The worst thing on earth is to be the thing you hate.

Dude… relax, you win

It may well be that I’m too stupid, but the fact remains… I simply cannot argue against incomprehensible gibberish.

I agree with you partially but not fully. I believe it is sick and wrong for men to have to go through life being ugly, instead they should all be hot lesbians. However, with current estrogen technology it would turn half of them into either cunts n fags, or limp wristed pacifists with no backbones. So it’s just a fantasy with no tech to do it.

You see it is more complicated you know. When someone is born pretty and given a silver spoon, they tend to turn into assholes. That is why men tend to be less narcissistic and have stronger personalities. Until women turn 50 and then start to reflect on their selfish behavior. Men have to try hard to be a good friend, and be a better person, whereas women can be cunty and an asshole and still get worshipped and praised, solely because females look better.

That is not to say that all men are good people. There is a certain way men can turn into grinches and Khans after too long of being ugly. Sort of ruthless and amoral like Pirates. Women seem to date this kind of man more. I don’t know if its because if women are inherently attracted, or because he’s ruthless and pushy and they give in. Or because they have a kind of “suffering quota” and that man has achieved it so they feel sorry for him.

Nature did put a sort of “limiter” on women and an inherent moral compass and compassion sense. Like how they like cute kittens and puppies. Unfortunately it doesn’t really work that well, it seems like it usually only works on only cute things most of the time.

As far as rape, I said earlier that most women molest everyone, wearing sexy clothes on purpose to arouse. Feminists will call me a misogynists because they are hypocrite narcissists who wont admit guilt. They will blame males for not “controlling themselves” enough. Feminists are ignorant of nature and do not believe nature is real. They do not believe males evolved a healthy natural sex-drive and want to pretend it is the male’s fault for being a natural male.

The hypocrisy is even deeper than that… Women dress slutty on purpose and males dont. Males dress non-sexual and drab. Women dress to arouse and molest. Yet claim that they are playing “fair” and the same rules. Even though they don’t follow the rules. Because males do not dress in a sexual way like they do. Yet are delusional narcissists who claim they do no wrong, and delusionally say males are the ones who are over-sexed. When males are only obsessed with sex because only 2% of adult males get approached by women. Males are under-sexed.

Feminists ban all prostitutes then complain if a man molests them or is horny…they are insane delusional narcissists who hate nature and believe nature does not exist.

Now, here is where me and Ecmandu disagree. I do not think all sexual encounters with females is rape. It is rare but sometimes females are the one who approach. Also, rape means there is no love. Rape means the woman fears, hates, and is disgusted by the person she has sex with. Usually because he is ugly or has a uninteresting personality. So if a woman loves a man it is not rape, it is ravishing which is different than rape.

Mostly, it has to do with spatial properties. Men are better with spatial things and women better at language, for sexual reasons. Its obvious because men are deformed and unsightly looking. Women are more sleek with curves and symmetry. So in order to enjoy sex with a man, the female must have hazy mind spatially. But her verbal mind just fine. Homosexuals same deal. More hazy. Less clear. Yet somehow Oscar Wilde great writer. It is really simple to see. Therefore women of high intelligence will be attracted to good looking men. Low intelligence willing to fuck uglier men. Women are the highest beauty. Lesbians tend to be more tomboyish and masculine. A certain masculine force of high intelligence. Therefore sex-slaves a way of dumbing down the mind. The longer one is a whore the dumber one becomes. Society hates rape because subconsciously they know it will dumb her down, erase her masculine virtue. Society wants to have masculine women to replace men at their jobs.

The other thing is, having kids doesn’t necessarily mean you are evil. Most people are degenerates who eat fat foods, breed 5 kids, and drive a polluting car, and support fake news and industrialist anti-nature ideas. But what if someone gave birth to the next Tesla. To make clean energy and save the planet. They would not be evil. Ghetto pple, people of low IQ, poor people, or people without high taste should be forced to have a 1 child policy. This will save the planet. Anyone who doesn’t listen to classical music should be forced to have only 1 kid. However if a poor person becomes rich or middle class, and they appreciate classical music, they will be allowed more than one. This cannot be faked because their brain will be scanned to determine the amount of pleasure the music gives.

Trixie,

The argument I make about rape is that a man needs to explain the 5,5,3 rule to a woman and she needs to understand it, in order for it to not be rape.

Otherwise it is manufactured consent.

Assuming they get wiser, they will realize that their consent was manufactured and thus violated.

…had the world also been a worse place in the past, none of us would have been born today either, as history would have took a different path either way.

But we were born, and we are here… and that is the beauty of the process of creation, to me…

Maybe for women it is. Since 98% of men only receive sexual intimacy from 1-5 women in a lifetime, they have a different perspective. Also considering it’s destroying the planet, they have a different perspective. I’m sure it’s wonderful for you!

Without approach escalation, women are just going to gravitate to 2% of males, either rich high IQ males, or dumbass hood males, and 98% of males will get nothing. If you are high IQ but lower class u will not get laid, they only like IQ if you are rich also. However if you are a low class dumbass you will get laid. Since there are more low class dumbasses than rich high IQs, idiocracy is inevitable in 500 years.

This was not at all a reply to the post you quoted.

Approach escalation is even more powerful than money … it is also raping the planet.

I’ll just assume that your reply was an amalgam of all my posts.

Women have yet in human history, consented to sex.

You know how hard it is to watch women holding hands and laughing with their rapists for people who know this truth … it’s disgusting.

Every woman thus far who had sex on earth has been raped.

Every man who has thus far had sex with women is a rapist.

That’s our stupid world history

…it is what it is, and that does not concern anybody else but the subject, who is not responsible for the destructive reaction of males. Do they not know any better? Oh, I forget… they’re not using their mind at this point, are they.

MagsJ,

I think you’re assuming that since only men who act out can be sexually intimate with women, that I have this huge sympathy and heart of compassion for those men. I don’t.

Also, a deeper truth about women is that they have something called the paradoxical effect or paradoxical aversion. There are no exceptions to this.

What this means is that if a man proves why he deserves sex more than others, women will blacklist him for sex. However, if a woman proves why she deserves sex more than others, men will be so moved by it, that they will feel passion to have sex with someone they ordinarily would eschew.

Women hate any attempt at explaining a merit system, because deep inside it triggers their denial system of picking the worst men for se .

It’s also about subjectification!

Men hearing a reasonable argument from a woman that she deserves sex will subjectify that woman more that objectify her, they’ll lower their other standards for women exponentially. Women hate to subjectify men. Loathe it. That’s why I often state that women objectify men more than men objectify women.

Well, that’s enough of that for now.

I said:

I meant:
…it is what it is, and that does not concern anybody else but the subject/the female, who is not responsible for the destructive reaction of males. Do they not know any better? Oh, I forget… they’re not using their mind at this point, are they.

I know that you have very little… if any, sympathy and heart of compassion for men who act out, to attract, and be sexually intimate with, women. As you can see by my small edit, in pink, it is the female that shouldn’t be held responsible for the destructive reaction of males, and females can also be destructive too… when they are spurned/don’t get their own way/another female gets the man or things they desire.

Oh the things females do too!