I dunno, I was gonna answer point by point but… I honestly feel that if you don’t understand what I’m saying, it’s because you don’t want to.
I will say, neither I nor anybody that reads Breitbart have any illusions about them being some kind of a-political fact source. What we appreciate about them is that they recognize the bias and endeavour, within that, to present you with all the relevant facts in their original contexts. Perfect? Who knows. Far, far superior to any other news source, that is for certain. They take a true geek approach to news.
What you really gotta be careful with is that CBS stuff.
All that white supremacy, anti-semitism stuff you allege, I’ll take it with the same massive grain of salt as I do when people call Trump a racist. It’s almost like it’s on purpose intended as a joke.
Unlike modern socialism, and here I do mean when its self-described (and that already by itself has more clout than even Trump himself) , where it is routine for actual anti-semitism, the kind where people will literally say things Nazis used to say that I won’t repeat, to be treated as normal, like universal human rights or redistribution of wealth.
And lastly, 20 mill will pay for a lawyer, no problem.
I fucking hate coldplay. All the songs sound the same and they all sound like the same shitty song. That singer dude seems like the type of guy who lets his woman put a finger in his ass.
Not saying that it’s true or false, just that the source is incredibly suspicious. After all, I can quote you directly saying Jews are as evil as Nazis.
How about this Mr Reasonable But Somewhat Susceptible To Propaganda, go to breitbart and read a couple of articles. Point out to me where they missreport or missrepresent something, or fail to acknowledge their political position.
I don’t believe I’ve read a dumber conversation
then what I am reading with Pedro and Jakob…
to sue someone you need what is called “standing” which basically
means that you must have been directly involved in the individual actions…
for example, I cannot sue the state of Texas for some pollution they
might have done because I don’t live in Texas and their actions didn’t affect me,
in any way, shape or form. If I fall down in someone’s driveway, I cannot sue the
next door neighbor because they had nothing to do with the driveway in question…
It becomes a matter of, does the action in question somehow involve me?
if it doesn’t, I have no standing to sue a senator or the president or a house
member if their actions don’t affect me. Try suing the president for something,
and I can guarantee the judge will throw the case out because it keeps the president
from being bombarded by nuisance suits. Which is why Paula Jones could sue
Bill Clinton because she was personally affected by his actions, but you are not
affected and thus you can’t sue…
K: why that is an excellent argument you have presented… so full of facts
and evidence proving your point… jeez, I presented evidence and facts
which contradicted your point and like some snowflake, you suddenly
attack me and call me names… What are you, two? try giving an adult
response… as for me, I have been happily married with the nicest woman
for over 22 years…… I am sorry you are angry and bitter with your life…
but hay, that isn’t my problem… I have my own problems and reading what
a snowflake you are, isn’t one of them.