I can only assume you mean to refer to this one concession that you posted while I was writing my post:
Between the time I started writing and the time I pressed submit, I apologise profusely for not checking what has thus far been flat-out raging against that which you can’t/won’t understand - and simply putting words in the mouths of others.
I had had no prior indication that you were going to randomly provide the least bit of honesty at that time, I am sorry.
Yes the capitalist is after money, I am so glad you admit this. Any creation, which is more often not present in the Capitalist but in the people he hires to realise the way in which he wants to make money, which is often the same way that others have been doing already, is no less present in the Socialist - however much you insist it isn’t. You can tell other people how they think until you’re blue in the face. More often than you seem to respect, it is the Socialist grafting in his basement to create, but lacking the funds to realise his efforts, and knowing this is the case for countless others who would otherwise be able to contribute their creations but cannot due to the demands of the capitalist system that they must waste their time and energy monkeying away for a pittance for someone else. So inefficient - and most likely intentionally so, because those benefiting don’t want the competition. “Perfect competition”, the classical liberal ideal would even things out, even if everyone was all better off as a result, but “fortunately” the capitalist system keeps down the competition as much as it can.
The Socialist can in fact be more inclined to want to create and contribute with no thought of reward. I am first hand testimony so don’t you dare tell me I am not what I am.
The reality imposed on them by the Capitalist system must eventually dawn on them, however, that they cannot give freely out of love - they must demand that others give to them in exchange for what they offer - the last thing they want to do. They are often not fit for the capitalist environment of demanding things in return for a contribution, and sometimes a non-Capitalist system of distribution is all that can work.
Socialists come in other shapes and sizes as well: for example they can volunteer to help out a cause and find their hard work is barely compensated enough to live the most basic of lives, irrespective of the effort that they put in, and even though employers can clearly afford more generosity. They are being taken advantage of due to their more giving and loving nature - by Capitalists. In my workplace, I see workers stressed out of their heads all day every day, before and after “official” working hours, meanwhile the upper echelons casually trot around, laughing and joking, on their phones, and occasionally having a chat in meetings. I am to suppose that their sheer love and creativity is so intensely packed into the short amounts of time that they’re actually working, that they can afford all this leisure, and us workers simply can’t imagine the magnitude of their next-level abilities.
There are so many counter examples to your myopic and generalised accusations, where you would have vast swathes of a population be reduced to one simple dismissal that just so happens to embody the worse case scenario imagined by the biased accuser who clearly never even attempted to understand the people unto whom he projects that which he probably just hates in himself.