Note to all billionaires especially those with holdings 50 b

[quote=“Meno_”]
Dear Sirs, to whom it may concern

It would take 10 billion dollars to set people up and relieve them from homeleasnes.

In many cases, with Capital accumulations of more then 50 nip
to 100 billion , (accepted to grow to a trillion ) Amazon, apple, wallmart, facebook, Gm, Ford, General Mills, Rockefeller fortune, Microsoft, and others)

You guys could very easily drop less then 1 percent of net holdings , or 2 percent of Your average yearly income in alleviating homelessness completely.

Of course qualifying families, veterans , drug users, and recently arrived unlawful immigrants would present a problem of building a bureaucratic institution with problems about deep pocket theft and graft, which could be policed.

Another problem of eroding the line between lower economic classes by such poor but not yet hopelessly unemployed , quitting their habitat , in order to qualify, and even the middle class resentment factored in, but again, this could all be prepared and pre planned .

The major problem is that capitalism can not due without huge contrast. Its simply inconceivable , even now, to see a marginal equivalency between the sharply defined middle and lower echelons of the wealthy.

But You gentlemen , holding more then 50 per.cent of.all wealth , You , consisting a mere 2 per cent of total US population, maybe less , (maybe even projecting to 1 percent or below, -present a travesty which really gives only lip service to any account of so called -Democratic Pronciples’

The word on the street is that all politi cal agendas, irrespective of these substantial ‘misnomers’, will fall flat whem long term accounts are found far short of any kind of social responsibility.

The aristocratic guillotine may yet be a reminder where certain limits are recognized to be counter productive, irrespective of semantic rationalizations , within which aristocracy is changing into autocracy, and without which things can’t go on as usual

That limit appears to be 1 trillion dollars.of capitalization, and the realization of even higher numbers , extended into the coming New World Order appears to indicate.it.

That is, after all the final arbiter of all ideologies and programs conceivable!

What say You? In a time of imminentl and present danger?

Can not charitable contributions be morphed by faux transformations of red scare.ex-compatriots, see this merely as an insurance policy, where ordinary charity is ripped off by the beurocratic underpinned pork who are usually rewarded by lion scaled rewards?

What ?

Method:

Here are some current statistics that show affordability:

According to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Annual Homeless Assessment Report, as of 2017 there were around 554,000homeless people in the United Stateson a given night, or 0.17% of the population. Homelessness emerged as a national issue in the 1870s.

The height of a stack of 1,000 one dollar bills measures 4.3 inches. The height of a stack of 1,000,000 one dollar bills measures 4,300 inches or 358 feet – about the height of a 30 to 35 story building. The height of a stack of 100,000,000 (one hundred million) one dollar bills measures 35,851 feet or 6.79 miles.

The states listed below have most progressive building codes, or they are home to the most interesting tiny house projects.

California. California is one of the best states for being a tiny-house enthusiast. …

Colorado. …

Florida. …

Massachusetts. …

Michigan. …

New York. …

Oregon. …

Texas.

Sep 22, 2016

BillyLand.comSelling Land in America
for almost 40 Years

Are you looking for
Cheap Land for Sale
as low as $497/acre?

Or are you looking for
a Cheap Monthly Payment
as low as $72/month?

We have rural Land for Sale in 44 counties throughout Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.

We currently have 262 parcels of owner financed land for sale in 44 counties across 16 States. Our inventory consists of some of the cheapest residential quality rural land for sale in America.

Though most of our land is located in Colorado and Oregon, we have dozens of properties available across the nation, from Alaska in the North to Florida in the South.

262 Parcels of land are
on Auction right now.

Next up on the Auction Block is…

California Forest Land 1 Acre, Beautiful Surroundings

Current Bid: $319

This listing ends in: 16 minutes and 7 seconds

Colorado Mountain Land 1.96 Acres - Spectacular Views

Current Bid: $495

This listing ends in: 16 minutes and 38 seconds

Klamath Lake 0.28 Acre Lot Klamath Lake Oregon

Current Bid: $354

This listing ends in: 18 minutes and 22 seconds

Colorado Land 2.53 Acres Of Flat, Open Space to Enjoy

Current Bid: $265

This listing ends in: 19 minutes and 31 seconds

Colorado Ranch land 40 Acres,Level, Mountain Views

Current Bid: $920

This listing ends in: 19 minutes and 56 seconds

View all of our land for saleacross America.

How are we able to offer quality rural land at these low prices? It’s our network of resources that enables us to acquire and develop large tracts of land at a reduced cost. We then pass these cost savings along to our customers. We also obtain individual parcels of land from original owners who have chosen to offer their land for sale. Our cash purchasing power gives us an advantage, and enables us to acquire the land at a reduced cost. We then offer this land for sale to our customers at a huge savings.

Over the years, investments in land have proven to be more stable and reliable than investments in the fluctuating housing market. Do you want to invest in land but think you can’t afford to? At Billyland we allow you to invest with low down-payments and monthly installments that are often times cheaper than the monthly cost of a daily cup of fancy coffee. This creates tremendous ‘Real Estate Leverage’ for the investor. Additionally, owner financing is available and there are no credit checks or references needed to buy land from BillyLand. Our purchase agreements are simple, straightforward, and easy to read. BillyLand really can make it easy and affordable for you to own and invest in land.

World wide appllocation would be impossible, but it would reinforce GOP~Trump credibility of supporting a National focused enterprise, and reduce the cleavage which has been produced between the producers and the consumers of.bad faith.

This may be the only last ditch effort of.resolving the acid atmosphere that has no salvage, either on the national or the international politocal stage.
Underestimating the constituency has had.plenty of warned., ignored calamitous effects, and the regurgitated innoscence of underlings has had plenty of catastrophic precedents, graveyards are full of them.

Denial nowadays, doesent appear as an option, the time has come to face clarity and openness. the alternative imbues a possible very heavy price, more than evocations of sighs of regret.

What the federal government won’t see or pay for, the constituency will habe to always pay.

[quote=“Meno_”]
Dear Sirs, to whom it may concernloom

It would take 10 billion dollars to set people up and relieve them from homeleasnes.

In many cases, with Capital accumulations of more then 50 nip
to 100 billion , (accepted to grow to a trillion ) Amazon, apple, wallmart, facebook, Gm, Ford, General Mills, Rockefeller fortune, Microsoft, and others)

You guys could very easily drop less then 1 percent of net holdings , or 2 percent of Your average yearly income in alleviating homelessness completely.

Of course qualifying families, veterans , drug users, and recently arrived unlawful immigrants would present a problem of building a bureaucratic institution with problems about deep pocket theft and graft, which could be policed.

Another problem of eroding the line between lower economic classes by such poor but not yet hopelessly unemployed , quitting their habitat , in order to qualify, and even the middle class resentment factored in, but again, this could all be prepared and pre planned .

The major problem is that capitalism can not due without huge contrast. Its simply inconceivable , even now, to see a marginal equivalency between the sharply defined middle and lower echelons of the wealthy.

But You gentlemen , holding more then 50 per.cent of.all wealth , You , consisting a mere 2 per cent of total US population, maybe less , (maybe even projecting to 1 percent or below, -present a travesty which really gives only lip service to any account of so called -Democratic Pronciples’

The word on the street is that all politi cal agendas, irrespective of these substantial ‘misnomers’, will fall flat whem long term accounts are found far short of any kind of social responsibility.

The aristocratic guillotine may yet be a reminder where certain limits are recognized to be counter productive, irrespective of semantic rationalizations , within which aristocracy is changing into autocracy, and without which things can’t go on as usual

That limit appears to be 1 trillion dollars.of capitalization, and the realization of even higher numbers , extended into the coming New World Order appears to indicate.it.

That is, after all the final arbiter of all ideologies and programs conceivable!

What say You? In a time of imminentl and present danger?

Can not charitable contributions be morphed by faux transformations of red scare.ex-compatriots, see this merely as an insurance policy, where ordinary charity is ripped off by the beurocratic underpinned pork who are usually rewarded by lion scaled rewards?

What ?

Method:

Here are some current statistics that show affordability:

According to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Annual Homeless Assessment Report, as of 2017 there were around 554,000homeless people in the United Stateson a given night, or 0.17% of the population. Homelessness emerged as a national issue in the 1870s.

The height of a stack of 1,000 one dollar bills measures 4.3 inches. The height of a stack of 1,000,000 one dollar bills measures 4,300 inches or 358 feet – about the height of a 30 to 35 story building. The height of a stack of 100,000,000 (one hundred million) one dollar bills measures 35,851 feet or 6.79 miles.

The states listed below have most progressive building codes, or they are home to the most interesting tiny house projects.

California. California is one of the best states for being a tiny-house enthusiast. …

Colorado. …

Florida. …

Massachusetts. …

Michigan. …

New York. …

Oregon. …

Texas.

Sep 22, 2016

BillyLand.comSelling Land in America
for almost 40 Years

Are you looking for
Cheap Land for Sale
as low as $497/acre?

Or are you looking for
a Cheap Monthly Payment
as low as $72/month?

Be the first to
know about new
Land for Sale!

Get Auction Alerts
in your email inbox.

View Listings on a Map

We have rural Land for Sale in 44 counties throughout Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.

We currently have 262 parcels of owner financed land for sale in 44 counties across 16 States. Our inventory consists of some of the cheapest residential quality rural land for sale in America.

Though most of our land is located in Colorado and Oregon, we have dozens of properties available across the nation, from Alaska in the North to Florida in the South.

262 Parcels of land are
on Auction right now.

Next up on the Auction Block is…

California Forest Land 1 Acre, Beautiful Surroundings

Current Bid: $319

This listing ends in: 16 minutes and 7 seconds

Colorado Mountain Land 1.96 Acres - Spectacular Views

Current Bid: $495

This listing ends in: 16 minutes and 38 seconds

Klamath Lake 0.28 Acre Lot Klamath Lake Oregon

Current Bid: $354

This listing ends in: 18 minutes and 22 seconds

Colorado Land 2.53 Acres Of Flat, Open Space to Enjoy

Current Bid: $265

This listing ends in: 19 minutes and 31 seconds

Colorado Ranch land 40 Acres,Level, Mountain Views

Current Bid: $920

This listing ends in: 19 minutes and 56 seconds

View all of our land for saleacross America.

How are we able to offer quality rural land at these low prices? It’s our network of resources that enables us to acquire and develop large tracts of land at a reduced cost. We then pass these cost savings along to our customers. We also obtain individual parcels of land from original owners who have chosen to offer their land for sale. Our cash purchasing power gives us an advantage, and enables us to acquire the land at a reduced cost. We then offer this land for sale to our customers at a huge savings.

Over the years, investments in land have proven to be more stable and reliable than investments in the fluctuating housing market. Do you want to invest in land but think you can’t afford to? At Billyland we allow you to invest with low down-payments and monthly installments that are often times cheaper than the monthly cost of a daily cup of fancy coffee. This creates tremendous ‘Real Estate Leverage’ for the investor. Additionally, owner financing is available and there are no credit checks or references needed to buy land from BillyLand. Our purchase agreements are simple, straightforward, and easy to read. BillyLand really can make it easy and affordable for you to own and invest in land.

Hey Meno
Yeah if only …
but these trillionaires are putting all the money they were wanting to share into suppressing US democracy and blocking the presidents initiatives. Its sad but true.

The worst thing in the world more or less except radical jihadism and a few other things is organized charity. Because as it turns out there is never any oversight and 90 to 99 percent of proceeds go into the pockets of the people who set up these charities, just for that purpose of collecting untaxed money and acquiring fortunes that are untraceable. It is estimated that big portions of African lands are now in virtual possession of sex slave driving “charities”, hundreds of billions, coming from the most innocent, well meaning people through tv ads, they now buy whole third world regions and maker big sex markets in them. Its eerie.

I would also think that very rich people should give some of their money to their countrymen, but like I said, the people who are rich these days really don’t have it in them.

Yeah, Barbarian, and the point has philosophical underpinnings , since the travesty is sinking to the apparently obvious, the Naturalistic Fallacy is being exposed in it’s very foundations, it’s no longer a sustainable fact that the erosion can’t be stopped, while something could/should be done, and Right Now!

More than that! The philosophical practical underpinnings are contrarian.
Therefore the infusion of contrariness, of contradiction, make sense on that level and, primarily on that level.
So among the contestants , which they recognize as a truism: Might is Right still matters the most.

So , its not exactly forgone, the conclusion that incumbents are favored, especially funny man, then the suspense of suspending the status quo, is the truth?

Hey swampy, in any case it has always been a model of narration.
Sorry for becoming murky, but compelled by the inertia brought on by Manifest Destiny. Sounds imperial, like some other, would have been centrist.

Money doesn’t exist Meno, goddamnit.

Oh?

How so?

youtu.be/GXE_n2q08Yw

Say what?

[/quote

I’m hip man, and gotta in form Yea, that it does, indeed, try spending a few weeks homeless, then compare that with a shelter, then come back and ask me again and may be i’ll answer different.

I have.

Emotional appeals. Ffs. It’s never about what is the case with you lefitsts, but what makes me feel righteous.

In fact, I might be taking another tour soon. This capitalist business is no bed of roses.

Maybe I should just call it quits and become a socialist and make it about money. I bet I’d make bundles.

Nah, better to die homeless.

That is right! Right down the alley of economic political justification appealing to people who are driven to understand in terms of the most basic logic, where everything had been reduced to the level of either this or that, whereas in reality thought is only appearent in simultainity.

The thing is, simultainity is a result of not recognizing that variables are at times removed by merely a few degrees of separation.
All else is political hyperbola.
That is why your collusive propositions make good sense.

No, it’s because I think.

I know it’s difficult, but it’s good for your health.

Way out, man! Thanks . I think .

And now the hyperbolically manifested has been stretched far enough to have gotten Your point, possibly understood by anyone ,

Stay healthy and think.

If You think this is a joke, think again!

you’re right.

Jesus Christ, Meno.

Whhhhaaaat Pedddoo?

Jus’ wanna think 'for it tanks!

Never let that happen and we won’t play good and bad cops, no more since chillin that high, so me thinks
~think~ there is a hell of a lot of injustice in the world, honestly do not believe anyone gives a …but its a comfort to let it out. I ain’t mad,
at no one, xcept, well those who wear their heart too open, and that even don’t bother.

After all we all humans .

God point Meno. From the money put into the anti Trump campaign so far which runs in the trillions counting the state resources, the world could have been fed for 50 years. But I predict that its never gonna happen, as without hunger there is no constituency for the trillionaire class.

You fight on their behalf very diligently Meno. You have guilt issues and you shouldn’t. Be a free man!

:sunglasses:

(Hypothetically, just cause dreaming is alright)

Wealth dingos
jealous of gringos
buying up jingles
missing the point like Rip van Winkle
now go and mingle
into real people
burn your newspapers
go on your own caper
find out your fathers Vader later.

Freedom’s just another word, regardless, & until some hurdles overcome assumptions on the contrary. Until then , its just a matter of judging rules oops’ -roles, by the clothes they wear, as if this all started yesterday. Who’s on first, who is on third.

Frankly, anyone can claim misrepresentation, on his face. And the best of the best politicos Nowedays are not jurists but actors.

Tentative verdict: 1 for Trump.

Derzhowitz:

RUSSIA INVESTIGATIONPublished 2 hours ago
The Supreme Court could intervene in attempt to remove Trump from office,
Robert Mueller ‘put his elbow on the scale,’ says Alan DershowitzVideo
Robert Mueller ‘put his elbow on the scale,’ says Alan Dershowitz
President Trump may succeed if he follows through on his attempt to take an impeachment attempt to the Supreme Court, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said on Friday.

“Our non-lawyer president may be closer to the truth than his lawyer critics,” Dershowitz wrote in an op-ed published in The Hill.

Dershowitz, a Fox News contributor, was referring to responses to the president’s tweet that he would take the issue to the nation’s highest court.

Donald J. Trump
:heavy_check_mark:
@realDonaldTrump
The Mueller Report, despite being written by Angry Democrats and Trump Haters, and with unlimited money behind it ($35,000,000), didn’t lay a glove on me. I DID NOTHING WRONG. If the partisan Dems ever tried to Impeach, I would first head to the U.S. Supreme Court. Not only…
“I DID NOTHING WRONG. If the partisan Dems ever tried to impeach, I would first head to the U.S. Supreme Court,” Trump said in April.

ANDREW MCCARTHY: MUELLER PROBE WAS ALWAYS ABOUT IMPEACHMENT

Dershowitz, in his Friday op-ed, pointed to previous Supreme Court justices who indicated that the Supreme Court should intervene under certain circumstances.

“Finally, as applied to the special case of the President, the majority argument merely points out that, were the Senate to convict the President without any kind of trial, a Constitutional crisis might well result," former Supreme Court Justice Byron White said.

“It hardly follows that the Court ought to refrain from upholding the Constitution in all impeachment cases. Nor does it follow that, in cases of presidential impeachment, the Justices ought to abandon their constitutional responsibility because the Senate has precipitated a crisis.”

Dershowitz also knocked people for criticizing Trump’s willingness to go to raise the prospect of a Supreme Court challenge.

CHAD PERGRAM: DEMOCRATS ‘NOWHERE NEAR’ THE AMOUNT OF VOTES THEY NEED FOR IMPEACHMENT

“No one should criticize President Trump for raising the possibility of Supreme Court review, especially following Bush v. Gore, the case that ended the 2000 election,” he said. “Many of the same academics ridiculed the notion that the justices would enter the political thicket of vote-counting.”

Dershowitz’s op-ed came as media outlets amplified questions surrounding potential impeachment. While some in Congress supported that move, many didn’t.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. – who presides over the chamber responsible for impeachment – has repeatedly pushed back on impeachment and, on Thursday, argued it could ultimately prevent an effective prosecution against the president.

Many have speculated that impeachment could spell trouble for Democrats in 2020, but some progressives, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., have argued that certain issues transcended politics.

Meanwhile, congressional Democrats continued pressing the administration for more information surrounding the Russia investigation – coming up against the Trump administration’s refusal to comply with congressional subpoenas.

Fox around the World

Sam Dorman is a reporter with Fox News. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.

Remember: Fox News now is playing defense right now.