I think we have a few more options than that. An eye for an eye is a specific guideline for punishments. There can be and there generally are other ones. There can be mixtures of education and punishment. There can be incarceration not as punishment to separate out dangerous people from potential victims. There can be community service and any of the above. There can be confrontations and potential reconciliation with victims, they can be civil suit type punishments. And there are more options, many of them practiced or have been practiced. And I don’t know how well turning the other cheek works or in which types of situations or with which people.
First, nobody demanded anything. It was suggested. 2) Nietzsche’s work is summaried in many different media and in many different formats. But then, you are not a famous philosopher. And, as far as we can tell, you haven’t made it through the gauntlet of getting the book published traditionally. This doesn’t mean it isn’t a great text, but perhaps we would feel drawn to read it if our experiences with your disucssions here made us curious. It’s like you do not consider our choice rational and appropriate. There are works by famous philosophers I have not read. Not only did those works make it through the gauntlet of a publisher, they have also stood the test of time.
Consider people’s reactions to your suggestion to read the book as feedback on your posts. Consider your inability to get the work to philosophers as feedback about the quality of your book or your approach to reacing them.
Right now you blame people for not reading your book, instead of taking responsibility for a general lack of interest. Any single one of us may be a closeminded petulant reader who avoids your book for the wrong reasons. But there is a general pattern. Perhaps the book needs reworking. Perhaps you need to hone your online discussion skills to the point where people think ‘hey this guy says interesting things, I want to read more.’
There are thousands of philosophy books, fairly recently written, which have managed to convince a good number of people to read them. This is what you are competing with. To more or less state that we are making a mistake by not choosing to read your rather than one of those is not going to get your book read. Especially since the book in part has to do with morals.