I think thats the idea. Speed is stuff. The basic stuff. It is, after all, not much more than a limit to existence.
Being is motion, and c is the basic stuff, the limit.
The fasted speed is the bottom threshold.
As for the squaring of c, it is not the squaring of the speed but of the number 300.000. (km/sec) isn’t even required. Thats the weird part to me, how come this number is so accurate to the relation of e and m.
But I can grasp the relation of the squared speed to the e and m using the idea that an electron is a collapsed photon, which is described by Farsight in the early posts of this thread.
So then you get a particle of light, i.e. a particle of speed, as P says it, which is collapsed onto itself, inning it refers to itself, which is nothing else but “squared”.
So by squaring a particle of waveform (2 dimensional) speed you get a particle of orbital (3 dimensional) speed.
So, C is the basic “bottom” of physical existence.
It is what stands between “thingness” and “no-thingness” and is kind of both and neither.
m = e /csquared
So m is like the “remainder” of the relation of speed and energy.
But more prosaically it is simply a thing that happens when speed relates to itself.
This represents energy, yes, but also something weirder than that: mass.
It is clear that mass is simply a compound of speed.
Yeah and for this whole situation I only have VO to explain it;
instantaneous causation obviously disregards speed, and since mass is speed, it also disregards mass.
All we have to say about this so far is that the thing that is causated beyond c is this thing called spin, which is like an angle of the electron with respect to its own rotation - so it is the way light has collapsed into itself. Its “style”. Style doesn’t have a limited speed, it just is.
Well the number works because it is a description. Nothing is determined by the number. It works because, as Nietzsche said, maths is applied logic.
Whether a photon is an electron unsquared or a ghost of the motion of the transfer of change of potentiality of electron movement, The square is required because that’s how much it takes to be enough to amount to energy divided by mass. You need all the mass, and you need it multiplied by far more than the speed of light, which would leave nothing left over, and it must be the speed of light itself because it must refer to something, it is dealing with stuffs and places so reference is needed. That is about how much, so that is exactly how much.
More poetically perhaps, it must overcocme itself to break out of itself and become energy. Along with the mass that it would transform.
The way my uncle described it to me, the photon, it is an electron racing magnetism. IT races ahead of itself but can’t quite catch up, and the resulting thing that does occupy that space is the photon.
Endurance through Mass, like the Roman Empire, stands for time.
Victory through energy stands for force and concentration, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, defeating the mass of the Persian empire.
Takeover through speed, ads Rothchild took over the bourse of London, beating the flow of information across the channel.
And finally, defining what power is, through style, for which hardly any mass or great effort is required at all; a mouse, a Childe (albeit a chubby one) suffice. Basically anyone who gets away wearing sunglasses at night, like Elvis, Jesus, Napoleon, - it is hard to define style other than as the supreme of all standards.
A chameleon, languidly changing nuance right before the light arrives.
Always expect the unexpected.
At the deepest level of definition in the standard model is a colour-shift inside a quark. I don’t know how many of these shifts occur per atomic tick.