Incel Culture

“Jeez!” Lol.

ok you got sort of a point.
But maybe that guy is just the wrong teacher. This is more how it should be for them.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ru3hAKjpGlQ[/youtube]

Oh ok he guy did this

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j0V05sVHFU[/youtube]

Not cool bro.

But damn. Yeah thats why I say its going to become a proper minority, victimized group and they will inspire lobbyists and then there will be policy and sexhelpers will be sent into their homes on your dime. These women are going to be taxed to pay for their own services. Okay maybe they’ll be exempt. But thats the way it happened in the past, the church provided for prostitutes and the priests were the pimps who prepared the boys for it by saying what exactly is “forbidden” and what you have to do after you did it. Boys were ushered into it by the very authorities who supposedly frowned on it. Beautiful arrangement really.

Some incredibly weird shit is going to happen on account of incels. I tell you. I wasn’t thinking it through before. But it it is the purest victim out there, the deselected piece of nature. It won’t happen if it is up to the spirit of Socialism.

I haven’t seen it yet, but this film seems like a potential bridge between Incel and martial arts.

youtu.be/7Bms6Hba-3A

I remember being younger and women flirting a lot, and my version of reciprocation back then was self destructive. It was my subconscious mind sabotaging … but I didn’t know why.

I knew even then that people were having sex wrong, I just didn’t have words for it then.

When I look back, it’s easy for me now to see all the women who were “out of my league”, but back then, I didn’t know that stuff. Very naive and sexually trusting, and then sexually frustrated.

I was 100% positive that sex was coming my way because I earned it/deserved it.

When I had my sexual awakening / enlightenment, I look back and think, “that guy back then didn’t deserve shit”. I’ve been with women before, don’t get me wrong… but I always knew something was off about people.

Then I discovered all the laws of sex about a year ago and realized that not only did any man or woman not know how to have consensual sex, I didn’t either.

Once I realized this, a tremendous weight was lifted off my shoulders.

I stopped being a ball of rage.

At this point in my life, even though I’m no longer a strapping young lad anymore, I’m at my greatest power to be with women, but there are no women who know how to have sex.

When I look back on my life, I am greatly appreciative of my self sabotage, my innate wisdom.

It’s less rape I have to atone for, what MagsJ wants me to call coercion.

Maybe you can be the first teacher of consensual sex. Find someone in the internet who will accept the terms and try to learn.
Its not gonna be no-sexs for the world so someone has to sep in and do something, eventually.

Maybe, if you’re the one who knows, this burden is actually on you.
Harsh but logical.

I m not gonna ask you to describe how it should be done I realize this is not gonna be destined for a comfortable answer and not my business anyway. I don’t believe that we consent to being born and I don’t think we consent to having examples to look up to and force us to grow. Life doesn’t consent to being stirred out of laziness, ever. But it is stirred out of it anyway. If it is not: standing waters breed pestilence as Blake says.

I think your theory is a way out of being poisoned by resentment. And thats very healthy way of dealing with the fact that sex is a violent and increasingly violent theater and that a lot of suffering is caused by it. I like that you keep your head above it at all costs. But you can surely understand why I would need you to go out and set an example to really convince me that there is something real behind your words. And - it is cruel of me to ask, because maybe there is no such thing as consensual sex as you mean it, but you need to believe it.

If you really believe that it exists, you need to explain what it is and bring it into the world.
Does it have anything to do with lesbian sex?

Um yes. Pretty much. Okay Im done talking.

Ask me anything about this post!

viewtopic.php?p=2729979#p2729979

Ecmandu should go on his very popular You Tube channel to promote all his crazy ideas just to see if anyone else agrees with him
He may find that he is not the only one who thinks that all sex is rape but that would mean he is not as original as he thinks he is
And may be there are still others who have been to hell or are a billion years old or know how to build hyper dimensional mirrors

Nobody before me has proven and articulated the “no means yes” tag on relationships because of sex dimorphism.

My videos are out of date.

There’s SOME good stuff in them, but I haven’t made videos in a while.

You should claim telepathy as one of your superpowers given that you apparently know the contents of absolutely everyones mind
However you are not very good at it because literally no one other than yourself thinks that ALL sex is rape - you are so wrong on this
What you describe as rape and what every jurisdiction on the planet describes as rape are light years apart from each other you know

Have fun talking to the voice in your head because it is the only one that agrees with you but is there any chance you can come back to Earth some time ?
Are you in hell right now trying to work out how to build a hyper dimensional mirror so that there will be no more rape in sex and how soon will we know ?


Post some videos here so we can see you do your martial arts

“No means yes” signaling that involves sex, is rape …

You just haven’t evolved yet.

Rape is always retroactive. As more people become aware, they will know that their past sex was rape.

People just don’t want to see it yet.

You are using the word rape completely different to how everyone else uses it as you know very well
You pay absolutely zero attention to this simple fact no matter how many times you are actually told

Does anyone think there was ever a time when consent as a concept did not really exist ?
How far back in our evolutionary history would we have to go to find the answer to this ?

I used to be like you. I didn’t want to admit I was a rapist and a rape baby.

I know why you’re so angry.

Even by your strange logic I cannot be a rapist if I am actually celibate
As I cannot violate a womans consent if I am NOT having sex with them

You theory is ever fluxurious. New shit keeps coming to light.
i.imgflip.com/32vyv9.jpg

So this means one can’t actually know one is raping someone while it happens. Ever. Not even in real rape.

Since “no means yes” is subconscious acting out of what the mind is always viewing.

Not teaching this makes a person responsible for all no means yes interactions.

What I meant by retroactive, though it can be perceived in current, is that the act is generally always retroactive (after the fact), this is true even of current ones (there is generally an after)

For dudes wanting to go beyond all this boasting and bragging and learn Shaolin from the ground up: here is the way.

Really? You’re still on this??

Ok, fine, the longest I’ve ever done a horse stance is around 4 hours give or take 10 minutes, then, I collapsed on the ground and couldn’t get up for about an hour.

That was after a year of training.

The thing about stances in general is that practicing same stance at the same height only trains thos muscle fibers and those muscle fibers alone …

To move your stance by even a millimeter means you’re starting from scratch again.

To complete horse stance training, you must be able to hold every stance indefinitely.

This takes decades.

Ecmandu

if it’s all the same I’d like to take a turn at this intersection away from kung fu politics and examine incel politics.

Following are some quotes. Usually I would italicize them but since there are a number of them I will just use opening quotation marks and an ending quotation mark at last quote. My comments are in blue and are directed at you.


"You can’t get laid because female sexuality is inherently discriminatory, which means that women will always categorize men into a “yes” group and a “no” group, and your involuntary celibacy simply attests to your belonging to the latter category.

“Modern so-called “egalitarianism” deprived you of the ability to do so, and thus deprived you of sexual contentment. At the same time as Feminism brainwashes women to see men as competitors in a zero-sum game, women themselves crave to submit exactly to those men who are their social superiors. Naturally, this state of affairs yields a massive, society- wide sexual dissatisfaction.”

I guess those two sound familiar to you.

“What the politicized involuntarily celibate community seeks is the creation of those social conditions most conducive to the fulfillment of normal male sexuality as described here; to be precise, it seeks to bring about a society in which each man (or at least, each sexually normal man) has a girlfriend or a wife - one who will be fully committed to his sexual satisfaction, will loyally stick with him, and will not engage in sexual relations of any kind with other men.”

Dogs will have better rights.

“Activism on behalf of the incel community is a difficult endeavor. Currently, our task is to lay the groundwork for the entrance of our ideology into the political mainstream sometime in the 2030s or 2040s. (The present cannot be changed in a radical manner, whereas the future most certainly can be substantially influenced by our actions in the present; wise political programs must be future-oriented)”

Whose future? And please, don’t cop out by saying it would be a future welcomed by everyone.

"A serious program to eliminate involuntary celibacy can be conceived as follows:

  1. Lifelong monogamous marriage must be socially regarded as absolutely superior to the culture of singlehood.

Religions have tried to get that ‘absolute’ pushed, and they failed.

  1. Government will launch a war on singlehood and take concrete steps to incentivize marriage.
    a) A bachelorhood/spinsterhood tax will be imposed on unmarried individuals once they reach the legal age of marriageability.
    b) Government will set up a national matchmaking agency, and will support private sector entities that provide effective matchmaking services.
    c) Unmarried individuals past the legal age of marriageability who refuse to cooperate with the national matchmaking agency or with state-authorized private entities that provide matchmaking services will be subject to punitive measures.

Ecmandu, what’s your version of ‘punitive measures’?

  1. The LGBT-SJW propaganda machine will be utterly dismantled.

  2. The media will cease and desist from promoting hysterical and/or false narratives designed to scaremonger the public about bogus sex-crimes.

You mean like ‘Fox News’ does now? But I digress . . .

  1. Sexuality, particularly young sexuality, will no longer be sterilized.
    a) Pro-contraception brainwashing in schools will come to an end.
    b) Abortion will only be legal in cases of rape, incest, fetal abnormalities, and high-risk pregnancy.

"The politicized incel community needs to see it as its objective to seize and transform the inner sanctum of all Progressive ideologies: academia. However, taking possession of (i.e., politically subverting) any one of the above-mentioned bastions of Feminist rule will greatly benefit the incel community. Imagine having the media or the government on your side! To reach that point requires winning the culture war now raging on the internet.

Yes, there are many little dictators running around nowadays with dreams of grandeur. But if the computer crashes or the cable company cuts off service, then it’s going to be Siberian poetry with a No. 2 pencil. Oh, and have you heard those nutty rumors about ‘real ID’ for computer owners? Or is that just pseudonym-paranoia on my part?

"Now, should the politicized incel community be made exclusively of actual incels? That seems like the wrong way to go. The contemporary problem of involuntary celibacy is political at root, and will only be solved by concerted political efforts. One need not be an incel oneself to recognize that men are perfectly justified in trying to advance our collective sexual interests by striving to replace the Feminist politics that now predominate society with pro-male politics. As long as a person contributes to the cause, it should not matter whether or not that person is an incel.

A new patriarchy?

“Incel politics will continue to be relevant throughout the 21st century. Unless or until women are biologically engineered to have higher sex-drives, or the male- female ratio changes from 1:1 to 1:4 or so, or any other similarly dramatic alteration in male-female sexual dynamics is caused by the progress of technology, the struggle to abolish Feminism and institute policies conducive to male sexuality will go on.”

Biological engineering on women? “Paging Dr. Mengele.”

All quotes from: The Incel Manifesto by Tom Grauer.


As I read all of that I can’t help but think of it as the complete denying of a human being’s (in this case women) rights by law. This is beyond Roe vs Wade, this is nothing less than re-establishing some centuries-old, Sharia-like rule over women. Perhaps full-body burqas (sold at Walmart) will be back in lawful style?

Are you politically inclined in the ways quoted above? Sounds like the ‘Incel Inquisition’ with a side of the Salem Witch Trials.

What does it sound like to you?