When a Negro is hated he claims it is became of his race.
A woman thinks it’s because she is too strong, or too beautiful.
And how would Jews explain animosity going back to the Romans?
After over 100 expulsions, how do they explain it?
Envy.
Part of the victim psychology is too seek a cause in other, before, if ever, one seeks it in one’s self.
In fact, one exclusively seeks it in another.
God. Perhaps the universe, if nobody alive is to be blamed.
This is what identifies nihilists of any hue.
They are always the victim of another’s weakness.
Rome captured Jewish homeland and put in a proxy regime repressing Jewish religion.
Jesus rebelled.
Rome and the proxy regime had him killed -
then Rome made a religion out of killing him.
This is how it started, they were pretty damn confused at the outset.
Yeah, but speaking the forbidden truth will get me banned, whereas you repeating the convectional ‘mythology’ will get you praise.
Do you really want me to tell you why and how?
It’s right in front of you, but you’ve been brainwashed to a degree that you do not even dare to see what is obvious.
Why, I ask, insinuatingly, were they expelled over 130 times?
Why are the same things said about them since Roman times?
Do you want quotes, or can you google them on your own?
Why, and how, are they currently dominating the US?
superior intellect?
Let’s use a formula.
If a group is over-represented in crucial fields of mass manipulation - let’s say by 60% above its numbers, then the excess must be equal to the degree of its superiority, right?
If not, then what other explanation can be considered to explain the discrepancy?
Nepotism, might be one.
Yes, no one ever hates the Jews because of envy. Oh…wait a minute, that would mean it cuts more than one way. But that’s complicated. Acknowledging complexity makes one look weak.
And note the victim stance in the post two up.
Just because someone presents themselves as always satisfied and not concerned and not insulted and unaffected
doesn’t hide the victim stance.
And when two of them meet, their posts end up like this…
Oh, you think I care about what you just said.
Oh, you think I care that you don’t care.
Oh, you think…
and so on.
Label it a brothel, but keep going there. Call them whores. But keep coming back. Like a john isn’t just a whore who doesn’t get paid for being a whore.
Is it not easier to say “They hate me because they envy me” than to seek the source in your own self?
So easy, in fact, that every man-child and little girls, ever teased in school has used it.
So easy that the morons in the US are told that the terrorist attack the US because they are jealous of her freedoms and wealth.
So easy, simpletons will accept it.
and why not, right/
It both explains another’s negative behaviour and ti self-flatters…and self-flattery si the root of degeneracy.
No, this is not philosophy…this is religion.
You fucked up half-wits.
Whenever you wonder why the world si so crazy and fucked up, look no further than your own reflection.
A masculine spirit says…
yeah…they hate me because I took and stole and abused them, as it was my right as the most powerful.
But not the emasculate effete, man-child…not the victim, not the Abrahamic.
No, he must remain the innocent victim of another’s vileness - another’s vice.
He must appear pure and virtuous.
Really?
So reality is relative to the individual?
A subjectivist, are you?
It pleases you to explain anti-Jewishness as a product of envy, so no other explanation will do.
By the way, hypocrite, not all Jews are Semites…and not all Semites are Jews.
In fact most Semites are not Jews. Judaism is an ideology, a meme - that is attempting to become genetic.
Never doubt yourself, hypocrite. Stick to what feels right.
Never doubt your own delusions.
Remain a minion.
No, Jews are not innmocent…no more than any of us are, of what happens to us.
No, the entire world did not envy them, but they behaved in ways that attracted animosity from the host nations they refused to integrate within.
And, yes, you are a little man-child, using womanly methods to explain the uncomfortable away, or to explain uncomfortable truths.
No, not everything that happens to you is self-flattering and a product of the other’s vice.
Maybe, just maybe, you had a hand in your own destiny. Maybe you brought this upon yourself; maybe you have some responsibility in the negative shit that happens to you.
Life is not divided ni binary all good and all bad.
Well, except for the minds of Abrahamics, and all nihilists.
Not all rejection is hatred…some of it is repulsion.
No, not everyone that hates you, is envious of your brilliance of wealth or life…some hate you because you are a prick, or because you are obviously a simpleton that frustrates them.
As if you do the latter in relation to reactions to you. LOL.
But here’s the thing. It’s not binary. What you present as either/or are things that are not mutually exclusive. IOW you have a simple view. Now. will you spend time trying to figure out why your view is simple? Nah.
Because your identity is so wrapped up in being the one who can face shit. Tells the hard truths and gets banned. You can’t lose face to yourself.
It should give you pause and a feeling of deep dread to think you will come back to ILP in
yet
another decade
brag about how you will be banned - from here? that’s a pretty pathetic way to stroke yourself -
and post paraphrases of the same positions
with the same little myth of yourself.
It’s not the positions that are tragic, they are a mixture of a number of things, including self-serving oversimplifications.
No either/or…
Accountability begins with seeking the reasons for one’s predicaments in himself, first, before seeking them in others.
A pattern of rejection cannot be blamed on others.
The mind must accept the difficult possibility that it is, somehow, responsible.
New Testament texts were written during the period when Jesus followers were a Jewish sect. Christianity had not fully emerged as a discrete religion. Conflicts between Jesus-followers and other Jews at that time were religious not racial. Racial antisemitism is a modern phenomenon. It’s based an outmoded understanding of race that was developed by anthropologists in the 19th century. Yes, the idea that there was a Semitic race has been used for hateful purposes in the modern period. And Biblical texts which reflect the hostility between Jesus-followers and other Jews including the one I cited above have been used to support racial antisemitism in modern times.
Before then, Jews were understood to be people who subscribed to and followed the Jewish religion, not as a race. And yes there were persecutions of Jews since the conversion of the Roman Empire in the fourth century. But, it was on the basis of their religion. For Jews to avoid persecution, the Christian majority expected them to stop being Jews and convert to Christianity.
It was the Romans not the Jews who were responsible for the crucifixion and historical analysis supports the hypothesis that the New Testament texts downplay the responsibility of the Romans for Jesus’ crucifixion and exaggerate the role of the Jews.
Or some Jews. Or a mob of Jews whipped up by some elite Jews. I don’t think it matters, really. Most groups will turn to violence at some level if you challenge notions dear to them. Some groups have ideologies that make it seem like it is incumbant on you, to do it right now, yourself, preferably with your hands or fire or stones or something.
Only pure face-value belief of the murderers would allow one to believe it wasn’t the murderers who murdered. Lol.
Is so perfectly dumb. Makes sheep look like Sherlock Holmes.
Rome had a proxy regime there. Jesus cleaned up the temple which the proxy regime had neutralized, to reinstate some true religion. The proxy regime notified Rome and they had the rebel taken out and made an example of.
Then, as it turned out, the rebel possessed some good ol’ magick and caused the murderers to make themselves into slaves of the Jew they killed. In their slavish loss of reason, they spasmodically pointed their fingers at Jesus’ origins to blame them for their own feelings of guilt, and the religion had taken on full scope.
People still are fanatically adhering this psychosis today and I really do not mean Christians in particular.