Very definitely. Victimhood of Jesus up there, front and center. You do not think for a minute that reverse psychology was formed literally? A very large percentage loved Him, and sacrifice was in a sense holy and derivitive to group survival.
In fact everyone was convinced by then of his immortal kingdom.
They would have seen Jesus as a deluded fool who was ff the mark in thinking he was to be the anointed one.
Let his blood be on us they screamed, because Jesus was trying to be their savior, but failed miserably. He just ended as just another wasted sacrifice.
Yes the mob.The rabbis saw him as more a political liability, though.
And the disciples did spread some believable word.
He may have been completely insane also, but how about delusive incidents such as the burning Bush?
I think delusion was collusive with normality, as it is today as well.
A literalist would see the burning bush as a miracle.
An esoteric and mystical thinker like Jesus would just see it as Moses reaching his Father Complex, as called by Yung and Freud, by activating his pineal gland and entering a full meditative state.
Most of the O.T. is depicting what is to go on inside our own minds.
That is why the Genesis painting shows god laid upon a representation of our right hemisphere. It also shows Jesus in a womb.
Or reversely.
The security of our minds if, it is descriptive of that necessity, vis; that such was necessary for literal pieces to integrate with/in the symbolic, than the answer is paradoxically correct.
And that further indicates the intra subjective requirement to/for an interconnected partiality within the whole.
I couldn’t agree more… the state of the world is obviously very reflective of this, and greater progress is hindered because of it. The best and only thing to do… to find your niche, and live and exist under your own terms, and not be tarnished by uncivil and unprogressive things.
Jews were by far and away, disproportionately banksters, communists and libertines, and banksters, communists and libertines were destroying Germany.
Additionally German Jews allied with the UK and US against Germany in WW1.
Jews are not innocent victims, now as then, they are disproportionately wealthy, powerful and will crush anything that stands in their way.
This is why all the poor Jews and farmer jews and the Jews living in little villages all over Eastern Europe needed to be killed, because some Jews in the cities had wealth? 100,000 Germans jews fought for Germany in WW1. I love the banksters, communists and libertines thing. They just couldn’t make up their minds could they?
A lot of Jews hate whites too, even if they’re irreligious.
Don’t forget media and political control.
Military control isn’t the same thing as political control.
Historically Jews didn’t have a military, so they used their economic, media and political influence to gain partial or full control over other nations’ militaries.
They used other nations, the UK and US in particular to do their dirty work for them.
Now they have nukes and a military, one of the most powerful in the world (thanks to the UK and US, which’ve been arming, funding and training them for decades), which they use to bomb and oppress their neighbors like Lebanon and Palestine, but they’d still rather have the UK and US fight most of their battles for them.
No before 1947 their lack of land and manpower prevented the latter.
Economic terrorism can be nearly as devastating as military.
Christians have done a ton of good for this world, too.
It was Christians that gave us modern democracy, industry, science, tech and medicine, human rights, ended serfdom and slavery, founded charities and so on, not atheists, Jews, Muslims, Hindus or Buddhists.
We all owe a great debt to Christians.
I do not think so. You are giving a fascist religion more credit than they deserve.
Here you are praising a religion that glorifies a genocidal and infanticidal prick of an imaginary god, that was created by a Roman government, and has kept it’s homophobic and misogynous ways and still tries to deny half of the worlds population first class citizenship.
Christians are taught by Christ, his disciples and most churches today to hate what they call ‘sin’, not ‘sinners’.
Insofar as Christians hate ‘sinners’, they’re behaving more like Jews and Muslims than Christians.
As for women, while chivalry prescribes different roles for women (men are to be the primary breadwinners, women homemakers), it’s by no means anti-woman.
Christian men are suppose to lay their life down for women, give their own lives for women, put them on a pedestal.
While the man is suppose to be the leader, he’s also suppose to be the protector and provider, to defend the life and honor of all women, not just his own wife and daughters.
Abuse of women is ‘sin’.
A Christian wife is free to divorce, and her family, friends and community have a duty to intervene if they feel she’s being mistreated.
Christianity promotes strong family values, and without those values, we wouldn’t be where we are today.
Does atheism have a future?
Most atheists scarcely have any children.
If the west becomes even more secular than it already is, it may die out, and be replaced by Muslims, or Catholic Hispanics.
Studies have shown that at least within countries, Christians are happier and healthier, physically, and mentally than the irreligious, and that they have more stable, harmonious families and communities.
I’m not against hedonism, but if the excess hedonism of the libertine becomes too widespread, it leaves a nation vulnerable to takeover both by armies from without, and by parasites from within, and banksters and Marxists are parasites.
What do banksterism and Marxism have in common?
Centralized control, oligarchy, under the guise of liberty and equality.
When most capitalists and workers are pretty ethical, when capitalism has been purged of corporatism, state capitalism and fractional reserve banking (and when there’s a strong safety net), capitalism is one of, if not the best systems, but when most people are pretty unethical, when capitalism has been corrupted by corporatism, state capitalism and fractional reserve banking (and when there’s a little-no safety net), capitalism is one of the worst systems.
Jews are disproportionately involved in both Marxism, and the bad kind of capitalism.
Jews are also disproportionately anti-nationalist, at least for everyone else but themselves.
Christians and whites are prevented by the Jewish, and liberal communities from organizing to defend themselves against anti-Christian and anti-white policies.