Universal speak, objective speak and objectivist speak. It must, not ‘I prefer’. And then binary. It is right or wrong, period. And by universal, that everyone wants the same thing, so the solution would be one for all.
The utterly depersonalized abstract approach of our resident serious philosopher.
One should not just live and explore and do the best one can given our in situ fallibility and individual desires and needs and skills and proclivities. No, One should wait, before choosing a path, for that path to be proven to all rational individuals it is the right path for everyone.
And yet the clock is ticking.
It is always a choice between paths. I wonder if the path of posting as you do has been demonstrated to be the path that all rational people should consider the right one. If it has, which is implicit in what I quoted, show the proof.
If the path you are already following has not be demonstrated such that all rational people should agree…
Then the issue is which path that has not been proven will one choose and on what grounds.
Your on a path, with practices: heady, mental, verbal, abstract practices. The issue is: why believe it is better than the other options (and I would add ‘for you’)?
That is, taking all this repetitious blather at face value, believing that you are, indeed, looking to find a path.