No, I guess I do not know what Aryan is… what signifies aryanism? a look? an outlook?
aryanism.net/culture/aesthetics/human-beauty/
Now, I do not agree with all of their views, like state controlled reproduction or banning makeup. I think most makeup should be banned, except organic makeup is ok. I do think liposuction should be banned though, because it encourages the notion that being fat has no consequences, and removes the incentive to lose weight naturally. As for state controlled reproduction, my fear is that the state algorithm is incomplete, because they themselves are incomplete. State reproduction sounds good on paper, but in actuality it will likely have a flawed algorithm. For this reason, there should be nerd cities, and bimbo cities. The nerds stay with the nerds, the simpletons stay with the simpletons, and so forth. Noone should be denied sex, but after their second baby they should have some form of state imposed consequence, like a tax or military service. Geniuses, however, should be encouraged to reproduce freely.
Also, I do not think all jews are ugly, such as Carrie Fisher, though I did as a child. Perhaps I lost my purity of mind since then. Star Wars is kind of made for that purpose, it shows a vast universe, and it’s made to have absurd aesthetics. An aryan princess would have missed the point altogether, star wars depicts an ugly universe.
HA!
So Ladyboy has followed Magnus Anderson.
BaaaaaaH that it is Sheeple country.
Arc excels at “You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar”.
Many a man has been brought to his knees in this way.
Wish I could do it.
On reflection, no I don’t.
Doesn’t work as well as you think Shieldmaiden.
We’re all victims of our own minds, Trixie, and of others’ minds too, until that moment when we “realize” it and either begin the process of moving away from it or continuing on with it.
It’s a simple thing to know that I’m not Jewish, being that I revealed it a few posts up. 
Oh, I only wish that I did excel at that. But there are times when it is better than using the vinegar.
Anyway, experience has taught me that “realistically” speaking, that’s not true. I once had this darn fly in my house for days and I just wasn’t quick enough for it. I put little bowls of honey, seriously I did, and they didn’t work. I think the fly has evolved to that realization. Eventually, I managed to zap him.
If you had read enough of my posts, you will soon realize that I also excel at using the vinegar and snake venom. 
But generally, first the honey, why not? Then if that doesn’t work, then the vinegar.
I wash my wood floors with vinegar.
Come to think of it, there ARE men who would prefer a bit or more of vinegar in a woman to the honey. They like the challenge. Nothing of value comes so easy.
You just need to be able to discern the two. One size does not fit all.
It’s not “sheepleism”. Magnus simply made me realise I was aryan all along. Liberalism is sheepleism.
This is my nature. As a child, I was very pro-gun, so to be liberal is to deny my nature. As a child, I did not like humans because they killed animals and polluted the environment, so to be a humanist is to deny my nature. As a child, I appreciated the Aryan beauty standard, for example Princess Leia seemed jarring to my consciousness when I first watched Star Wars. Nowadays I am more tolerant of aesthetics, because the standard of aesthetics has dropped so low, and because we have all been bombarded with bad aesthetics we become desensitized to it.
Hitler was a vegetarian. My condition of whether or not I like him depends on 1 factor. If the holocaust was true, I do not like him, because I view putting Jews in ovens as cruel, no better than something an evil human would do. If the holocaust was fake, then I do like him, and he was a victim of media lies and social manipulation. So whether or not I like him depends on that factor. You see I am very logical, and not sensational, unlike most liberals.
As satyr said, hannibal lecture does not decieve, he simply tells people what is true, and that is how he gets them to a side. The liberal community around you is not true, nor are they just. They function as a mob mind, a community of horde thinkers, who censor anyone who disagrees with them.
For example, their latest thing is fat shaming. If you fat shame someone they will censor and block you and defriend you. This is because liberals are sensational and cannot be reasoned with. If you try to argue with them, and tell them that fat people deserve to be shamed, because their lifestyles result in more animals being harmed, global waste, and pollution, they will not hear it, and hit the block button, like an immature grade schooler.
My goal to castrate the Jews, has very little to do with Aryanism. It is simple Justice. I find it insane that society (the horde of humanists and liberals) finds it acceptable to mutilate and circumcise baby genitals. If you press the issue, they will make up an excuse to defend their insane behavoir, such as saying the operation prevents diseases. I can make the same argument, saying that castration removes the sex drive, and thus removes the likelyhood of spreading st-type diseases. Yet they will not take the time to hear me out, because they are irrational.
I liked that IF you were referring to SM’s post above. Don’t want to make an A _ S of myself by assuming here.
Actually, if you were referring to me, I enjoy a challenge. That’s part of the thrill of the journey for me.
Who wants a man who’s too easy to get? - yes, I know, it works both ways.
I love this poem…
The Road not Taken
by Robert Frost
Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;
Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,
And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
Gives me the shivers…
I had a dream about women. On TV there was an instructional video about it. It said “What to get a woman on valentines day?” In it, a jew in a suit, and unnaturally clean smile, was shining a woman’s shoes. He said…“get her shoes with diamonds! It shows that you have money! Women love money!”
Now, I will explain my views.
view a. If a woman likes money, because it means she doesn’t have to work extra hard to provide finances for her child, that is acceptable.
view b. If a woman likes money, just because of money’s sake, that is unnacceptable, hedonistic, and jewlike.
view c. A woman equates “sex” with “babymaking”, and seems to be ignorant of the concept of birthcontrol. This makes her very ignorant and machinelike in her behavoirs, making sex un-romantic and only a function of babymaking. This is unnacceptable.
view d. If a woman will not date someone because they don’t have money, this is unnacceptable, because it indicates view c, that she is ignorant of modern technology, and views romance as a machine-like process. Gone are the days of women valuing people as a person, and what they have on the inside, and here are the days of raw materialism, consumerist machines, with no heart. Gone are the days of ancient German fairytales of true and earnest love, and here are the days of factory produced couples.
So, if a man was truly in love with you, you would deny him happiness, and give him misery, because he was “too easy to get”. The global unconsciousness deepens.
Ultimate Philosophy
Could you clarify that one for me. It’s kind of ambiguous.
It couldn’t JUST BE because of money’s sake though it may appear that way. It’s because of what that money can bring her; that is, the INDIVIDUAL.
I mean, what is she doing with it? Hiding it in a wall in her basement?
If that is the case - she equates sex with baby making, wouldn’t you say that she wants to make a baby? Where does the birth control enter in? That would obviously come later on when sex took on an entirely different intention.
I have two children, Trixie, and I have to say that I enjoyed every moment of trying to create my son and daughter.
I hate generalizations. They don’t always fit.
But I will agree with you. For some women, it is only about getting pregnant which can work against the woman.
It may be unacceptable to you and perhaps to her mind/body connection but not to her self.
I’m not so sure that this above woman views romance at all. If she did, she might just date someone who she felt she liked, was hot, intelligent.
Dating doesn’t necessarily mean you’re ready to marry or commit to one person.
That would depend on the individual, Trixie. A woman of value can “know” a man of value and deeply appreciate him.
There are also men out there who are just out there to get what they can from women. It works both ways Trixie.
.
I thought that Ken and Barbie broke Up? 
Fairy tales! Just look what they’ve done to people, the delusions and illusion that they have created in our minds.
…and they lived happily ever after.lol
But I was speaking of the beginning of the relationship, Trixie. I really do not like when a man falls all over me. Well, maybe a small part of me does - after all I’m only human - but that ALSO would depend on who and what the man was, how he thought, how he felt, his outlook on life, etc.
One other thing, wouldn’t I also have to be in love with this man? Or do I sacrifice myself to someone who I do not feel the same about?
There’s this commercial on tv sometimes. I think it’s for EHarmony(?) The two people met on line, met and in two weeks they were deeply in love. Two Weeks??? Then the woman looks at him and tells us - He told me he loved me first.
I feel a little hardput to think of that as a deep connection - more like a - let’s just see who says I love you first kind of thing. She won obviously, a feather in her cap, because he said it first.
Every time I see that commercial I find it a little pathetic and I have to laugh. Of course, I realize that I’m not seeing the whole picture.
But this is the way more or less that people view love being in love. All feeling not much more.
I don’t think I explained game theory and sexual stratification well enough for you.
Males are sexually stratified, and socially ostracized. Women have the dating power. For instance, males are prevented from flirting with women, but women are not reprimanded for flirting with men. Women are catcalled on the streets, but men are never catcalled. Males commit suicide 10 times more than women. Female prostitutes are considered valuable, male prostitutes are not considered valuable, but a joke, like a gag gift.
Women are socially valuable, men are not socially valuable, they are deposited overseas as soldiers. Take this into consideration when examining behavoirs.
In reality, women hold all of the power in relationships for this reason. Game theory was made to combat this, to create the illusion that women do not have the power, to lessen the probability of rejection. Men are truly the victims, not women, and they have to use special tactics so they don’t get hosed.
If a male secretly has a crush on a woman for years, and finally tells her how he feels, she will reject him 9/10 out of ten. So when a male does find a woman who does seem to love him, he falls in love. Only the woman cannot understand this, she cannot fathom how someone is in love with her so soon. It is because the male already has had a lot of experience with women, while she has little experience with dealing with men. THe male has the capability of discernment (Such as Sherlock Holmes) and the ability to quickly read people, and the woman does not, she takes a long time before she can accurately read someone’s essence. Therefore, it puzzles and confuses the woman as to why he falls in love, and due to her own confusion she runs away from him, which quickly turns his love into despair, and rage, and just as quickly as he falls in love, he falls out of it. This gives woman the confirmation she needs, saying to herself that she was right all along, that he never really did “love” her.
It is clear as I can say. Anything excess, is excess. For example a rich woman who has all the money she needs, who refuses to date anyone poorer than her, no matter how superior they are to her, genetically or memetically. I have encountered several females like this, they are unbearable. For instance, I knew a woman who programmed videogames…she said she refused to date anyone unless they were as wealthy and successful at videogames, she said she did not want to date anyone who thought she was cool, and thought she had a cool personality for making videogames as a female, she only wanted someone who was as successful as her. This psychology indicates a blurring, an inability to discern superior/inferior values, the underlying ideal is money and wealth, and they cannot discern genetically superior or memetically superior entities, all is funneled as a function of money to them. For instance, they cannot discern good art vs. bad art, they simply buy expensive art because the price tag tells them to. This is different from just wanting a decent bit of pocket change to raise a baby, this is spoiled hedonism, and just plain odious and rude.
And with the money thing, again, if a woman says she does not like “broke niggas” it means she is either a spoiled hedonist, or cannot discern genetics/memetics without funneling it all down to money. The other option, it could mean that she equates sex=baby making and she implicitly assumes technology to prevent baby making, such as contraceptives, does not exist, at least in the back of her mind.
I offered you my sperm woman, to get you off my back with this Romanticism, and yet you persist. I am not the stuff that Romanticism is made of, Arc
I am hairy, and fart a lot, and inappropriately scratch myself in public. I sit in restaurants, and read… and sometimes I start picking my nose, forgetting where I am, and look up to see a shocked female looking at me… I try to be cool about it, and slip it away non-chalant into my mouth to chew, but it doesn’t seem to make their shock go away.
I don’t always do my laundry, rarely pick up after myself, pizza boxes stacked up high, my wrinkles on my shirt only go away once I sweat through them a bit.
I walk slow from a bum knee, my voice in monotone, and I’ve stopped shaving, and I am deeply impoverished.
I am not a source for flirting. I am unflirtable.
Why not go do this with Mr. Reasonable, or Only Human, or Satyr even? I am just not up for the challenge, I see nothing in the act of flirting if it doesn’t lead to sex, and nothing in sex if it can’t lead to a baby… no point. Its a waste of time. Id rather ear a pizza that uselessly flirt. Especially when the “woman” I’m flirting with could look like Richard Simmons for all I know. I gives a fuck about Feminine and Masculine forces at play. I got plenty of access to pornography with girls eye fucking the screen if I want it.
And calling me Gussie makes you sound like a old woman. Geriatric woman with a stroller. My name isn’t Gussie, it’s Steve. I am a real person, not a rubics cube of romanticism, you can’t figure me out.
Wow! you’re really selling yourself there Turd 
I follow the philosophy of Popeye.
I yam what I yam.
I’m tired of being targeted as a disposable philosophy cock. I keep getting targeted at group meetings, they want intelligent DNA and a decent biology, but not the nasty man that goes with it. I even wasvtargeted by a model in San Francisco… no matter where I sat, she sat with me, knew nothing of philosophy. After a few months, she admitted she was breaking up with her boyfriend, despite constantly hitting on me, and was going to Europe for a few months.
The girl I always noted this with at the groups, trapped me later at her apartment in another town when I dropped off all my books for her to have, I was more or less raped, trying to get aroused at her sight (wasn’t appealing, I just wanted it done). I had to stay the damn night, thought she was into philosophy, but it was just cock.
Its happened to me a few times sense on various levels. I… just don’t have the heart for it anymore, I’m always let down. I’m not real, I just fit categories. Ex military, paratrooper so I seem tough (debatable), and am obviously intelligent, original yet very well read, stubborn, etc. I have class yet crudeness, elements far apart and incompatible in most men, yet any given point is unremarkable. Yet, women never appreciate that complexity, it’s all very simple to them. I’m not allowed to be a person, if I step out of their expectations for even a moments, they become weird. I’m just not interested anymore at playing at that level. If they like my looks, then take my sperm, don’t harass me otherwise. Ecmandu is just as attractive as I am. Mr. Reasonable looks like Jared from Subway, but isn’t that bad either. Just like… dammit, lay off my cock unless your willing to go for the full ride. I want my full adperations and vision, my ugly and my stinky, everything that dissapoints. I expects to see it in woman, don’t really see that depth. I expect more out of a mate… for starters, the capacity to mate, that’s No. 1. Married with children just doesn’t work out. I’m not a alcoholic with women issues like James Bond, want something more than just a pretty face, but dammit, I want at least a face. I’m not going to waste my time flirting with a faceless person who could be a balding, 400 pound, 45 year old make. I may not be the best catch, but do have requirements that the person constantly flirting with me St least certifies herself visually as female.
Ill be locked up in a feminist ran gulag for saying that, but dammit, it’s how I feel about it. I want real women, complexity of character and aspirations, not just a generic flirt. I want to see the movements of her soul in her actions and defiance, risks and endeavors. I want to feel the woman in her, not be mislead with Hello Kitty shit.
So till then, I’m a disgusting slob, and to be honest, it’s close to the truth in many instances.
An interesting site, but not one I’d come across through choice 
What do you, personally, get out of subscribing to the site Trixie?
There are aryan sites that want to prohibit liposuction and makeup too, who want the KKK to resemble the NAACP (honestly only a matter of time till they merge and fuck everyone over), I’ve seen them pull out just about everything. I wouldn’t bother asking questions of Why when it comes to their affiliation, it’s always a convoluted mix of Nazism and modern liberal arguments, always your neighbor next door, just misunderstood crap, with a dose of cryptic, latent violence and genocide, no different really from modern green friendly marxist. They are all enlightened progressives who insist either bevause of my blond hair and blue eyes, or my class background, I should support their Nazis/Marxist group. Sometimes they give you the zinger and combine Marxism and Nazism together… which isnt too hard to do, as both are Young Hegelian philosophies (Nietzsche was heavily influenced by them and took heavily from Stirner).
I doubt they can identify a single Aryan artifact from the Aru Darya river that yielded that civilization… rememer I pisted asking for Khazakstani and Uzbek historians on this site. They have literally zero concept of what is Aryan and what us not. I mean fuck… the guy who developed the idea married into a Jewish philosopher’s family… it was a linguistic theory only, and heavily mistaken at that. Very little archeological evidence back the shit more Aryans posit these days, I know it quite well, made a effort to learn the actual evidence arhrological site by site, myths and their mutations, routes they migrated to several civilizations. It has no bearing with these idiots running lose talking about Swatzikas and the white race, fuck… they werent even that white to hegin with.
Its a idiots game, shaking the dice and going with whatever collection of rotten data they have. Erik is a dark skin Mexica, so is a instant Aryan, clearly a mixed breed. Trixie… fuck, the Nazus would of mirdered the fuck out of him for crossdressing on the spot, in the streets, infront of children… no hesitation. Dont even get me stsrted on Zoots public masturbation and pot smoking, I doubt the gestapo was accepting of that shit.
None of this shit makes sense, till you stop trying to make sense of it. These two udeologies attract every absurdity and rotten taboo now. I really do like the idea of a angry Tranny rising to the ranks of Mein Furher. It seems rather fitting, we can salute them for their progressiveness as we push them off the plank. Im sure Eisenhower would chuckle at this show.
TF wrote:
The Trixie one crossed my mind, the other two are just as hilarious.