I’m just trying to explain to you that 0 in base nine is different than zero in base 10.
No. A “0” in a decimal position means zero in that position.
In base 9, 10.0 means 1 Nine, and 0 Ones.
In base 10, 10.0 means 1 Ten and 0 Ones.
In base 9, 13.0 means 1 Nine, and 3 Ones.
In base 10, 13.0 means 1 Ten and 3 Ones.
Alright. You want to go there. Decimals.
The decimal point is a dimension.
When I have an IP address…
It’s like…
967.340.231
Ok.
That’s all in base 10.
But there are different dimensions (2 to be exact) that I’m encrypting with.
You know why we do that?
Because infinite base doesn’t have rationality.
So you agree that in base 9, 13.0 means 1 Nine and 3 Ones, and 0 Ninths??
I’m just going to tell you very simply.
You can use a base to make any number a whole number.
What is the whole number for 9 in base 9?
You’re still thinking about base 10. Your understanding of bases is flawed.
We’ve had 3 bases that are important to the human species… base 5 base 10 base 12
Now!
There’s also unary base.
You always use the same symbol, but it’s actually base 3… because you need an enter bar and a space bar.
I just deal with number theory at this stage in this stage of my life. I’m not trying to solve math theorems because I’ve seen the world of spirit now.
The question you forgot to answer was:
What is the whole number for 9 in base 9?
What the fuck?
Nine is not a number within 10 in base 9. It is ten.
In base 9, the decimal “10.0” means 1 Nine, and 0 Ones. The decimal positions are different.
In base 10, you are so used to calling 13.0 the number “Thirteen” that it never dawns on you that it is 1 Ten and 3 Ones. We call that “Thirteen.” But there is no number “Thirteen”, the numbers are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
“Thirteen” is a 1 in the Tens position, and a 3 in the ones position.
Now you see why I avoided saying numbers in word form when talking about other bases. The word “ten” and “thirteen” become ambiguous in those contexts. Best just to stick with numerical representation entirely, integers, decimals, fractions.
You’re getting into placeholders again.
A base is not defined unless or until it has a placeholder.
The undefined base is base infinity. At least in terms of comprehension.
In base infinity, you have to give everything a new name instantly and forever. It doesn’t allow for continuity of consciousness.
I’m happy to explain all this stuff.
I’m learning how difficult it really is to word this stuff. It is incredibly difficult to state it accurately switching between base 9 and base 10.
Like I said, there isn’t even a “9” in base “9.” LOL
No.
You don’t get it. Nine is what defines base 9.
That’s like saying there’s no 10 in base 10.
Prove it.
There is no number 10.
The numbers are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
Writing “101” means a 1 in the Hundreds decimal position, a 0 in the Tens decimal position, and a 1 in the Ones decimal position. Every other decimal position has a 0 in it.
There isn’t a single symbol number in any base of the base itself. That’s what it means to be a base. Consider that in base 11, we would represent the value of (10 in base 10) as X (Roman numeral X). The version of you in that world would of course be here saying “there isn’t even an X in base X LOL”.
But you and I here in this world don’t even consider that fact notable at all. Of course there isn’t.
Alright,
I see where you’re going with this.
0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Is base nine.
When you switch bases, the 8 is actually 9 in base 10.
When you change bases, you’re literally changing symbols.
I feel like this needs more of an explanation. I don’t understand what you mean by this.
It’s a somewhat complicated concept.
I understand his argument now.
Bases are defined by placeholders.
Currently we use zero as the placeholder.
If we change bases, that number is no longer in base.
That means that the base number symbol changes.
Just the symbol, not the representation.
What I mean is that in the system we call “base 9”, there is no symbol “9”. In the world of base 9, there is no use of the symbol “9”.