(x %) is merely a shorter version of (x \times \frac{1}{100}).
.3 Means “3 Tenths” 3/10
.33 Means “33 Hundredths” 33/100
.333 Means “333 Thousandths” 333/1,000
Percent is how many “Hundredths”.
.3339 means 33.39/100 or 33.39%
1/64 = 0.015625 or 1.5625%
9/64 = 0.140625 or 14.0625%
1/3 = .333… or 33.333…%
(10) is a shorter version of (1 \times x^1 + 0 \times x^0) where (x) stands for the number of fingers on your hands.
The fact there is no digit representing that number in base 10 is completely and utterly irrelevant.
Actually…
Only one of those 3 is 3.334%
Even better, (10) is a shorter version of (1 \times (9 + 1)^1 + 0 \times (9 + 1)^0).
That is the long version of the decimal 10.
There is no math in the representation 10. It is a 1 in the Tens. That’s it.
Not tru.
Then you don’t understand what decimal expressions are.
You’ll move the conversation along faster if you just decide to be upfront about why it’s not true, what sort of thing is true instead, instead of waiting for someone to ask you.
I think you are making it more complicated than it needs to be in order to suite the needs of other math that coincides with that theory of yours.
The numbers are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
That’s it! The rest is all decimal form. You don’t need to have a name for them.
10 we call Ten
13 we call Thirteen
There is no name for 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
This funny trying to explain bases.
Dude, motor, we’re all in teaching mode right now.
There’s so much more to math than bases.
You are being hard headed on this.
By the way, your really long number that you said has no name, has a name:
I call it “motor”
Refute me.
And if you want to go to the Latin… I’m too lazy to name it by counting all the commas.
I want him to ask me first. By asking a question, he would demonstrate interest. As it is, he doesn’t look like he cares, so there is no point in me explaining anything. His demeanor is that of an arrogant prick who talks too much and listens too little.
Check this out:
1/128 = 1 divided by 128 = 0.0078125
If you multiply 0.0078125 x 72 you get 0.5625
Guess what the decimal is for 72/128 ??? Yup it’s .5625
Guess what .5625 divided by 0.0078125 is?? Yup it’s 72!!
See how my math adds up perfectly??
Guess what 1/3 =?? .333…
Guess what .333… x 3 = ??? .999…
See how that’s BS math!
Pointless repetition.
Because it goes in one ear and out the other, so I have to keep repeating it until it sinks in.
Nah, you have to do what’s necessary to do in order to help the other person realize you’re right (and they are wrong.) Of course, that’s assuming you’re right. Repetition is a cheap tactic and generally a sign of laziness.
Hello?
Alright.
Someone hacked ILP so I couldn’t post.
Looks like I can now.
So…
My answer is my theorem.
1 minus base and all it’s divisors causes this problem.
Also, the lowest denominator of 1 minus base subtracted from base causes this problem.
I don’t know why this is true.
If you do… I’ll be astounded.
You have the floor.