Nobody is talking about 3 pies. We are talking about 1 group.
“1 group of two pies divided by 2 is 1/2 groups of two pies” is equivalent to “1 / 2 = 1 / 2”. We’re taking 1 and dividing it by 2. We’re taking ONE group of two pies and dividing it by TWO. “Group of two pies” is a unit of measurement, it is not a number we’re multiplying.
Magnus Anderson:Noone ever said that “1 / 3 = 1”. That’s just Motor Daddy’s brain not working properly. Instead, what has been said is that “1 group of three pies divided by 3 is 1 pie”. The two statements are nowhere near equivalent.
Nobody is talking about 3 pies. We are talking about 1 group.
Yes, 1 group of three pies. That’s what I said.
Motor Daddy:There is no number “3” in base 3, so there is no fraction 1/3 in base 3.
In base-3, (\frac{1}{3}) is represented as (0.1).
“1 divided by 3” in base-10 is “1 divided by 10” in base-3. And the result of that is represented as “0.1” in base-3. In base-10, there is no representation of that number.
Your entire argument so far has been that, just because there is no base-10 representation of “1/3”, it follows that “1/3” does not exist. That does not follow. If you do not have a word for something, it does not mean that that something does not exist.
Is .3333 (bar) not base-10 of 1/3? If so… Show me the .3333 (bar) piece of pie. If not, screw math.
Motor Daddy: Magnus Anderson:Noone ever said that “1 / 3 = 1”. That’s just Motor Daddy’s brain not working properly. Instead, what has been said is that “1 group of three pies divided by 3 is 1 pie”. The two statements are nowhere near equivalent.
Nobody is talking about 3 pies. We are talking about 1 group.
Yes, 1 group of three pies. That’s what I said.
Motor doesn’t seem to jive with the interchangeability of terms.
2 dozen eggs -vs- 24 eggs. You and I can comfortably treat at least most statements about 2 dozen eggs as interchangeable with statements about 24 eggs. This operation of interchangeability or replaceability doesn’t seem to work for motor, for whatever reason.
Is .3333 (bar) not base-10 of 1/3?
It’s not.
“1 group of two pies divided by 2 is 1/2 groups of two pies” is equivalent to “1 / 2 = 1 / 2”.
So 1 dozen of 12 eggs divided by 2 is 1/2 dozen of 12 eggs??
That is total NONSENSE!
1 dozen divided into 2 equal parts means you end up with 2 parts of .5 dozen.
The math looks like this:
1/2=.5 and .5x2=1.0
Now show me what your math looks like.
So 1 dozen of 12 eggs divided by 2 is 1/2 dozen of 12 eggs??
That is total NONSENSE!
You’re saying that “1 / 2 = 1 / 2” is total nonsense. I don’t know what to tell you at this point.
Motor Daddy:So 1 dozen of 12 eggs divided by 2 is 1/2 dozen of 12 eggs??
That is total NONSENSE!
You’re saying that “1 / 2 = 1 / 2” is total nonsense. I don’t know what to tell you at this point.
What is 1/2 dozen of 12 eggs? What does that even mean?
Motor doesn’t seem to jive with the interchangeability of terms.
2 dozen eggs -vs- 24 eggs. You and I can comfortably treat at least most statements about 2 dozen eggs as interchangeable with statements about 24 eggs. This operation of interchangeability or replaceability doesn’t seem to work for motor, for whatever reason.
I take it that he’s insisting on base-10 representation. If he can’t find one, he declares that the number does not exist.
Ichthus77:
Is .3333 (bar) not base-10 of 1/3?
It’s not.
Yeah haw. 1/3 may not exist in base-3, but it does in base-10.
The word for it is .3333 (bar).
Show me the pie.
Yeah haw. 1/3 may not exist in base-3, but it does in base-10.
The word for it is .3333 (bar).
The reverse happens to be true.
We’re saying the same thing.
Magnus Anderson: Motor Daddy:So 1 dozen of 12 eggs divided by 2 is 1/2 dozen of 12 eggs??
That is total NONSENSE!
You’re saying that “1 / 2 = 1 / 2” is total nonsense. I don’t know what to tell you at this point.
What is 1/2 dozen of 12 eggs? What does that even mean?
Is it funny that he introduces a phrase to the conversation, and then later is incredulous about the meaning of the phrase he invented?
Is it funny that he introduces a phrase to the conversation, and then later is incredulous about the meaning of the phrase he invented?
His words, not mine. I just changed the units of measure to show him how his statement was total nonsense.
1/2 Dozen of 12 eggs is NONSENSE!
1/2 Dozen = .5 Dozen
1/2 dozen does not equal 6 dozen.
1 dozen divided into 2 equal parts means you end up with 2 equal parts of .5 dozen. Simple as that.
No motor, you introduced the entire topic of “dozen of 12 eggs”, nobody said that before you did, and you started talking about dividing it by 2.
No motor, you introduced the entire topic of “dozen of 12 eggs”, nobody said that before you did, and you started talking about dividing it by 2.
Right, it was to show how ridiculous it is to say 1 group divided into 3 equal parts equals 1 pie. That is nonsense! That is like saying 1 dozen divided into 2 equal parts equals 6 eggs. NONSENSE!
Again:
1 Dozen divided into 2 equal parts equals .5 dozen, not 6 eggs! If you think 1 divided by 2 = 6 then you have some serious issues!
1/2=.5
And not a word of that has to do with you not understanding the own term you brought into the conversation haha.
And not a word of that has to do with you not understanding the own term you brought into the conversation haha.
Which term are you referring to?
Motor:What is 1/2 dozen of 12 eggs? What does that even mean?
Is it funny that he introduces a phrase to the conversation, and then later is incredulous about the meaning of the phrase he invented?