i would have posted this in the 9/11 conspiracy thread in social sciences, but it really doesn’t contribute to an actual discussion. i just thought it was a good rip on all the 9/11 conspiracy theorists out there…
this is also very good: Debunking the 9/11 myths
It’s nonsense. The claim that the conspirators would necessarily kill Dylan Avery shows such a rank misunderstanding of how such a conspiracy would work in an age of mass media that I couldn’t be bothered to read the rest.
The popular mechanics article has been roundly exposed as a shoddy mess. I’m sure you can easily find the blogs, articles and whatnot that do this. There are a lot of lies on ‘both’ sides of this argument, but the material evidence runs more with the ‘whackjobs’ that with the people who believe that uneven damage to skyscrapers can produced practically identical collapses and that a Boeing could hit the Pentagon and only produce a hole large enough for the main fuselage, and leave no significant debris.
oh i didn’t mean for anyone to think the first one was a real debunking. maddox is funny, that’s all.
Fair enough.