A Brave New world Essay! (For someoneisatthedoor)

This is not life changing turn back now while u have the chance… i’m pretty sure this isnt the final copy either so it might be missing some points…

A “Brave New World”, Political Philosophy and Utopia

Humans are social animals. In order to survive in the world humans learned to communicate and collaborate with each other. As humans evolved over time social structure became more complex in order to accommodate and maintain population growth. A conflict of ideals emerged from the question: What is the best way to run a society? Among these ideals is that of utopia. Utopia is essentially the desire for a perfect civilization where humans can co-exist in peace; however not all humans can agree on the proper means of achieving this end. It is the contrast in these ideas which give rise to Political Philosophy. Political Philosophy allows people to criticize and mediate discussion on a variety of topics including the debate on utopia. Political Philosophy is also in place to make sure that utopian ideas are not lead astray and become dystopian. Aldous Huxley describes a dystopia in his novel “Brave New World” where political philosophy is annihilated by an oligarchy of scientific utopian thinkers who suppress their society and essentially destroy human emotion. This novel is a reminder of the dangers of a society without the balance that political philosophy creates. Although it is impossible, humanity will always strive for and crave utopia. It is the primary role of Political Philosophy to ensure that human rights and freedoms remain scared and undisturbed.

Huxley’s “Brave New World” describes a fictional dystopia. The kind of dystopia Huxley proposes is categorized as a scientific utopia. In this novel the failed utopia is made possible by advancements in technology and science. In the words of Raymond Williams:

The technological transformation has a direct relation to applied science. It is the new technology which, for good or ill, has made the new life. As more generally in technological determinism, this has little or no social agency, though it is commonly described as having certain ‘inevitable’ social consequences

Huxley’s “Brave New World” is in essence our modern society taken to the extreme. In society today there are many ethical questions regarding: Genetic engineering, drug manufacturing and religion. In the “Brave new world” these technologies eliminate the desire for free will, art and even love in exchange for carnal desire and material wants.

The totalitarian regime in “The Brave New world” exploits the science of biology in an effort to preserve the delicate balance of its society. In the “Brave New World” all citizens of the world state are hatched, not born. The state manipulates embryos to produce five distinct classes labelled: Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Epsilon. Humans in the Alpha and Beta class are left untouched as soon as an embryo is formed while all other classes undergo what Huxley describes as the Bokanovsky process. It is a method of stupefying the lower classes by excessive cloning techniques and “alcohol treatment”. By doing this the totalitarian regime maintains a social order and hierarchy. The lower classes are “designed” to perform the most labor intensive jobs in the “Brave New World”. They do not question their status as they do not have the mental capacity to do so.

Another suppressive element in this society is the effect propaganda has on this society. At a very early age all young citizens undergo a sort of desensitizing treatment. People are trained to repeat a wide variety of sentences, such as the planetary motto: “Community, Identity, Stability”. These messages are also transmitted to its citizens while they are sleeping. For example in chapter five one of the protagonists, Lenina, reflects on an experience of a hypnopaedic message she received after suddenly waking up in the middle of the night…
Every one works for every one else. We can’t do without any one. Even Epsilons are useful. We couldn’t do without Epsilons. Every one works for every one else. We can’t do without any one…
These mottos and sayings are constant reminders of the delicate balance that must be upheld. The citizens also receive their dosage of propaganda at the “feelies”. The “feelies” is similar to modern cinema although it invokes sexual feelings and desire by tapping into the nervous system. Like everything else in the “Brave New World” the “feelies” only act on the most basic forms of pleasure. The “fellies” is fundamentally an extension of what we know as pornography.

The state also has mandatory programs for young children in order to create a desired comfort level with death and sexual promiscuity. The “Brave New World’s” death treatment program for adolescents is mandated by the state. Young children attend classes that teach them to see death as a benefit to society. They are made to spend time in the “Hospital for the dying” where they run around and witness countless numbers of deaths until they become completely emotionally detached. Another treatment of the “Brave New World” is the “Erotic Play” children are made to have with each other. This exposure to sex at a very young age also discourages any human emotion or feelings that may be generated by sexual interaction later in life. When a citizen becomes a full grown adult they are expected to be as sexually promiscuous as possible as becoming attached to one mate suggests the possibility of human emotion, undesirable and inefficient.

Like most states the “Brave New World” has a religious aspect to it. The “Brave New World” is different in that they do not worship a god, they worship mankind and technology. Their time is relative to the years A.F (after the death of Henry Ford), one of the champions of the industrial age. Many of the technologies used to control human development are seen as holy relics to the citizens of the world state. The directors of their operations have a similar status to that of a priest or a demigod. The “Brave New World” also has religious ceremonies known as “Solidarity Services” in which the citizens call out to their “Ford” to make them become one.

“Ford, we are twelve; oh, make us one, 
Like drops within the Social River; 
Oh, make us now together run
As swiftly as thy shining Flivver.”…
“Come, Greater Being, Social Friend,
Annihilating Twelve-in-One!
We long to die, for when we end,
Our larger life has but begun.” 

The hymns are a tribute to the ultimate goal of the society, to achieve the ultimate efficiency and consolidate their utilitarian values. The singing of these hymns is accompanied by the consumption of the drug soma.

The main controlling mechanism of the totalitarian state is the drug soma. Soma is the solution to any social problem that hasn’t yet been worked out by the state. In the “Brave New World” soma is handed out more regularly than currency. It also serves a religious significance to the citizens of the world state. Soma serves as a type of religious sacrament and is consumed after every service to bring about primal urges. Citizens are also conditioned to take soma whenever they have any sort of feeling outside the realm of simple pleasure. It does not appear that soma is an addictive drug in physical sense however the citizens of the world state are almost completely dependant of the substance. A citizen of the world state does not have the capacity to deal with any situation that may cause them the slightest discomfort without a dose of soma.

Clearly the “Brave New World” is dystopian. To have a society similar to that of the “Brave New World” would bring an end to history. Culture is an essential element missing in the “Brave New World”. The citizens of the world state are not human. In fact this civilization bears more resemblance to an ant colony than it does a civilization. Emotions such as love, hate, fear and pain are all critical elements of the human condition. One of the protagonists in the story, Helmholtz Watson, becomes frustrated at the notion that his work seems meaningless and wishes to write about something more significant. Helmholtz cannot escape his feelings. Without pain, suffering or love one cannot reflect on life in a meaningful way. Man can only define his existence through his suffering. Suffering allows for understanding and a greater appreciation for the good. Helmholtz cannot write because he cannot transcend the physical. He has no knowledge of anything outside a nice feeling or a bad feeling. Without human expression there can be no culture.

The “Brave New World” also shares some similarities with a fascist state. In the Second World War the Third Reich also sought to destroy the individual and replace it with a single entity. Hitler was obsessed with the idea of creating an efficient machine as a state. The German media was dominated by propaganda. Similarly to the “Brave New World” the German people experimented with artificial selection. The Aryan in the mind of the Nazi was the perfect and most efficient form of the human. The Nazis developed breeding camps and forced people to be sexually promiscuous. Children in Nazi Germany were also exposed to desensitizing treatments. The Hitler Youth was significant in creating mindless soldiers whose only allegiance was to the state.

The methods of escapism used in the “Brave New World” are also common in modern North American society. The use of soma in the “Brave New World” is similar to alcoholism and drug abuse in our society. People are consumed by the demands that a capitalist society places on them. Drugs and alcohol are a means to diverge from reality and obligation similarly the world citizen uses soma to diverge from any bad feeling. In North America efficiency also plays a major role in societal values. The genetic modification of crops and the patenting of life demonstrate a disregard for the sacredness of life.

Political Philosophy cannot possibly protect society from all dangerous dystopian ideas. The values of society are ever changing. Political Philosophy will develop along side society, constantly reminding it of the mistakes of the past and proposing utopian ideas that will create progress for civilization.

~Szpak

Dear Szpak,

This is a good essay, though I do somewhat predictably have some quibbles, questions and criticisms. But no essay is perfect and I do have rather particular views about this book which arne’t shared by many…

I’m starting to see how you conceive of the difference between Utopian and Dystopian worlds and although I don’t agree I’ll let it slide for now. The rest all seems fine, though of course it’s simplified for the sake of argument, as I’m sure you are aware.

As on the other thread this is a major point of difference. Compared with today’s media/political/emotional spectrum the world depicted in Brave New World is very narrow, but compared to the west of the 1920s and 30s…

Emotions are simply conceived of one-dimensionally, as desires that can be quashed. If people conceive of all of their dissatisfactions as being temporary, as being potentially quenchable by the world then they won’t have any reason to develop political philosophy, radical arts and so forth. That’s the kicker, it isn’t any change in the actual emotional states but in the way in which those states are conceived. An in terms of pure hedonism I think that Brave New World is Utopic by comparison with our world…

I would completely disagree, the book is simply about what happens when one ceases to see any metaphysical moral significance in one’s desires and actions. It is about the conception of desire, the destruction of political philosophy is the aim, not the policy, if you see what I mean. I don’t have any faith in the notion of balance.

In some ways yes, in some ways no. The sexual promiscuity of the people of Brave New World is much less problematic that it is for our society. In their society free sexual play is a means of keeping the population down because it is seen as nothing more than scratching an itch. In our society we get het up about the moral component, some claiming it is their moral ‘right’ to do whatever sexual act they choose, others claiming rigid moral boundaries regarding sexual acts…

Indeed, I feel that the world depicted in the novel does a better job of dealing with such a culture than ours does…

The notion of freedom of the will is an invention of ruling classes - Nietzsche.

Love is abandoned as it is precisely the sort of long-term emotion that threaten stability…

i.e. a world where no-one feels out of place, no-one yearns for anything greater than what they have and almost everyone is happy almost all the time. Purely in terms of means to an end the society depicted is pretty peaceful and happy…

It is precisely because of such prejudices as calling such things ‘the most basic forms of pleasure’ when there’s no necessary reason to say such a thing that makes you view the world as dystopic. I maintain that the sexual culture in Brave New world is as expansive and liberated as ours but deals with the problems of such a culture in a much more effective way.

Primarily because it is a lasting emotion, something that lingers and cannot just be discarded.

As to propaganda in general - have you read 1984? In that you get an expertly written depiction of the tension between propaganda (public words) and thought (private words) and how one cannot necessarily dictate the other. As the novel culminates the central character is not crushed by propaganda but by sheer fear of torturous pain…

Once again, the singing of hymns does not a totalitarian dystopia make. We sing hymns…

Again, I feel that the relevance is in aiding the conception of desires as temporary. If depression can be warded off by doing something as simple as taking a drug then it can’t be the symptom of a sick society and hence there’s no reason to question the powers that be…

No offence but what do you mean by ‘an end to history’? Do you mean something approximating Fukuyama’s sense?

This is patently untrue. They go to the feelies. They take drugs. They participate in rituals. They converse. This is culture. It may not be particularly likeable to you but it is culture nonetheless…

This is a purely rhetorical statement.

Not if they can be eliminated safely… Things are only inherent if they cannot be changed. Art and political philosophy aren’t inherent aspects of being human, though I’ll admit they do crop up in most of human history. Don’t let some naturalist prejudice of your own dictate your reading of someone else’s work…

On the contrary, one can but ‘meaningful’ means something different.

Really? Why?

There can, it’s just a very shallow, short term culture. You’ve seen people who sit in clubs not talking to their friends but sending illiterate text messages to other people haven’t you? Like it or not that is still culture.

I’m not sure that there is such a thing as ‘the individual’, at least in the sense of something that can be destroyed. I’d say that Hitlerian fascism sought to destroy a particular individual ideology in the name of the national good…

That’s more just the logical end of humanism, artifical selection with non-humans is as old as the sun (and as such is perfectly ‘natural’)…

Not mindless, just differently minded. Get off your high, liberal, western horse…

It is only sacred if it cannot be desecrated, axiomatically…

I maintain that in the regards in which Brave New World resembles our world at the moment (as compared with Huxley’s world in particular) it is utopic, it deals with the problems in a more stable manner that engenders greater happines and harmony…

wow…

K as well I would like you to know this was written in haste…im not liberal in any way shape or form… plus i dont like horses…

It is quite amazing to see the things that flow out of your mind almost automatically when you don’t really have time to think about how your writing… u are concerned more or less with getting to 1500 words… I feel like a dirty western propaganda drone… ewww get it off!

I agree with most of what you wrote although i find that you connect Utopia with Stability too much… Utopia is the “best place” so in actuality it would be better to have art and all those things with the stability of the brave new world no?

I will break down all ur arguments over the weekend! But for now i have to spank michael ignatieff for his misconceptions of terrorism!

I meant ‘liberal’ in a very general sense to mean any western who believes roughly in democratic rights and so forth…

i kid