Some notes from the other day:
So if the apparently antithetical properties timeless (unchanging) and temporal (changeable) are contingent, extrinsic properties, what essential, intrinsic property do they NOT negate? That’s why you need to talk about changeless (necessary) (whole) SUBSUMING (being ontologically prior to, but coeternal WITH)… (in a mutually productive way, because love—a choice—is not love without demonstration/creation/expression) …change (contingent/possible) (capacity).
Accidental (extrinsic) features can be taken/pass/change away — heaven and earth (general revelation/appearance) — but the word (logos) — essence — can never be taken/pass/change away.
See the Bertrand Russell quote at about 26ish minutes:
…how did he differ from essentialism… MICHAEL says his own name:
the whole is Aion, within it many aionos (Matthew 28:20)
What is most real is what is in every moment. (Store up your treasures in heaven, and pray for these treasures to be everywhere visible on earth.)
See Dr. Craig’s video about the logos apologists. Reread the Greek part of Eternity in their hearts.
More: https://youtu.be/xjiLZ2BwSjQ?feature=shared
Some graphical notes on screenshots from the vids:
